Clinicians tested by MMR controversy
16 April 2003 17:00 GMT
by Henry Nicholls
Oxford
- Further testing of the hypothesis that the 3-in-1 measles,
mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine causes autism is impossible, say
researchers. Worse, they add, it is unethical.
The putative link between MMR vaccination and autism was first
published in 1998 by Andrew Wakefield and colleagues at the Royal
Free Hospital in London. The hypothesis emerged on the back of a
growing body of parental reports of an apparent association
between a steady increase in diagnosed cases of autism and the
introduction of the MMR vaccine.
But these are no more than temporal associations, says
Elizabeth Miller, epidemiologist and head of the Immunization
Division of the UK government's Public Health Laboratory Service
"The hypothesis was perfectly reasonable to generate given the
observations," Miller told delegates at the 3rd International
meeting of the
Edward Jenner Institute for Vaccine Research, here in Oxford.
But almost every one of the dozen-or-so studies to test
Wakefield's hypothesis has failed to support it, she says. "He
rejects these studies on the basis that they're not testing the
hypothesis, but that's because the hypothesis keeps on evolving,"
she said.
For example, following initial studies that did not demonstrate
a link, the hypothesis shifted to one that suggested an
association would only be detected in the presence of other
factors, such as antibiotics and atopy, says Miller.
The latest incarnation of the hypothesis, she says, is that the
vaccinated measles virus persists in the gut of those with autism.
"It's now evolved into a place where the hypothesis is untestable,"
said Miller. There is no ethical reason for gastroenterologists to
take biopsies from children, she says, which would be necessary to
put the hypothesis to the test.
Furthermore, there is strong criticism of the technique,
immunogold electron microscopy, with which Wakefield claims to
have identified measles virus in the gut. "The reagent they used
to demonstrate the presence of the measles ... is wholly
non-specific," said John Hermon-Taylor, chairman of the Department
of Surgery at St George's Hospital Medical School in London. "The
science is flawed," he said.
Miller agrees. "I don't think Wakefield is operating with the
conventional scientific method," she told BioMedNet News.
The potentially fatal childhood diseases measles, mumps, and
rubella had been virtually absent from the UK since the government
introduced the MMR program in 1988. However, Wakefield's evolving
hypothesis has led parents to seek alternative immunization
through private routes or to shun vaccination altogether,
resulting in local outbreaks of these diseases around the country.
The first signs are appearing of an increase in these diseases
where vaccination is rejected. "We're now seeing significant
outbreaks in these low-coverage communities," said Miller. If
coverage of MMR vaccination does not improve, these dangerous
viral diseases will become increasingly common within a matter of
years, she warns.
In spite of the combined evidence of numerous studies, the
British public remains wary of governmental advice on health
issues in the absence of an alternative explanation for the rise
in autism and, especially, in the wake of government mismanagement
of the BSE crisis and foot-and-mouth disease. Some 1500 families
have been given legal aid to bring a court case against the main
manufacturers of the MMR vaccine. Miller expressed hope that this
will lay the controversy to rest once and for all.

|
Send us your
comments for
publication.
|
| Sign up for BioMedNet News weekly
email alerts. |