SARS Virus Seen as Long-Term Threat
Whether Disease Will Cause Crisis or
Sporadic Outbreaks Is Hard to Predict
|
|
 
|
|
Three people wear
masks as they leave Prince of Wales Hospital
in Hong Kong, which has been hit hard by
severe acute respiratory syndrome.
(Anat Givon -- AP)
|
|
_____FAQ on
SARS_____
A Guide to Origins, Symptoms
and Precautions You Can Take
_____Roundtable_____
Video: Washington
Post reporter Rob Stein speaks
with washingtonpost.com's
Suzette McLoone about the spread
of the SARS virus and the steps
that governments are taking to
contain the outbreak.
_____Live
Online_____
Discussion: Stephen
S. Morse, director of the Center
for Public Health Preparedness
at Columbia University, will be
discuss SARS, 2 p.m. ET
Thursday.
_____More on
SARS_____
The Mystery Virus: A Guide to
Origins, Symptoms and
Precautions You Can Take
(The Washington Post, Apr 23,
2003)
Thousands Try to Flee Beijing
as SARS Cases Rise (The
Washington Post, Apr 23, 2003)
WHO Issues New SARS Travel
Advisory (The Washington
Post, Apr 23, 2003)
Full Coverage
|
|
|
|
|
_____Photo
Gallery_____
New disclosures by the
Chinese government have
heightened the world community's
sense of alarm over the spread
of SARS.
Enter the Gallery.
Earlier Gallery: Mystery
Pneumonia Spreads Beyond Asia
|
|
|
|
|
By Rob Stein
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, April 21, 2003; Page A20
Despite an unparalleled global counterattack, severe acute
respiratory syndrome (SARS) has likely become a permanent threat
that will plague humanity indefinitely, infectious disease experts
say.
A scientific consensus appears to have emerged that the window
for stamping out the dangerous new lung infection has probably
closed because the SARS virus has become entrenched in many places.
"It's definitely here to stay," said Michael T. Osterholm,
director of the University of Minnesota's Center for Infectious
Disease Research and Policy.
What remains far from clear is whether the epidemic will continue
to expand and become a greater public global health emergency, or
settle into the landscape of human diseases that cause sporadic
outbreaks of varying size year after year.
"The question is, 'Is this going to be a public health nuisance,
a public health problem or a public health crisis?' " Osterholm
said. "That's the million-dollar question."
In the long term, SARS is likely to affect some countries more
severely than others, experts said. China probably will remain
hardest hit, while countries where the disease has been rare so far,
such as the United States, may continue to see few cases.
"It would be hard for me to see how it could be eliminated from
places like China or Hong Kong at this point," said James Hughes of
the National Center for Infectious Diseases in Atlanta. "I think it
would be prudent to say it's here to stay. The jury's still out in
terms of whether it becomes established here."
Other specialists said that it's highly unlikely that SARS will
disappear from any place where people have become infected.
"It could gradually escalate and escalate and escalate. It could
undergo a rapid burst of cases. Or it could stay at this level and
peter out because of public health measures," said Anthony S. Fauci
of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. "It
could also peter out now, and, like we see in many cases with
influenza, it could come back next season with a vengeance. Any one
of those is plausible."
However the epidemic unfolds, SARS has demonstrated both the
power of modern medicine to fight a new microbial menace and the
limits of even today's science when nature spawns a novel pathogen.
"It's been a very impressive story about how quickly various
technologies have been brought to bear," Steven S. Morse of Columbia
University said. "But yet the disease continues to spread."
To contain any disease transmitted through the respiratory system
is difficult. So it might have been impossible under any
circumstances to contain SARS in China. But any chance of squelching
the nascent epidemic was lost because the Chinese government
concealed the disease for so many months, experts said.
Since SARS emerged in southern China in November and began
spreading internationally in late February, the illness has extended
to almost every corner of the planet. As of Saturday, the World
Health Organization said more than 3,500 cases have been reported in
at least 25 nations. Hundreds of people have been hospitalized,
thousands have been quarantined and at least 182 people have died.
In the United States, officials are investigating more than 200
cases in at least 34 states, including five in Virginia.
SARS circumnavigated the globe rapidly because it is the first
dangerous new disease in decades that can be transmitted
person-to-person -- most commonly through droplets sprayed out by a
sneeze or a cough. In addition, intercontinental air travel enabled
infected people to transport the virus internationally in record
time.
The WHO, already on high alert because of earlier reports that a
dangerous flu bug had resurfaced, responded with unprecedented
urgency. It issued global alerts, mobilized the world's best
scientists and marshaled intensive containment efforts. Because of
heightened fears about bioterrorism, countries such as the United
States were ideally poised to rapidly identify and isolate cases,
which is key to stemming a budding epidemic.
The response snuffed out some early hot spots, identified the
viral cause in record time and focused intense pressure on the
Chinese government to be more forthcoming about the outbreak.
Nevertheless, SARS continued spreading to one country after another,
and the number of suspected cases reached hundreds and then
thousands within weeks. Once an infectious disease has spread
widely, eradicating it becomes almost impossible.
"We can't control tuberculosis in the world. And that is clearly
a disease that doesn't look to be as easily transmissible as this,"
Osterholm said.
Researchers have taken early steps to develop a SARS vaccine, but
that weapon is years away at best -- and even widespread inoculation
may not be able to stamp out SARS.
Despite concerted efforts against many infections, smallpox
remains the only communicable disease to have been wiped out.
Wide-scale vaccinations were able to eradicate smallpox because it
infected only humans. One of the many unanswered questions about
SARS is whether it can hide in animals.
"If SARS is coming from another natural source, such as from
another species, then it's quite possible that it could be
reintroduced periodically," Morse said. But even if there is no
animal reservoir, SARS could continue spreading.
"Once you've established a disease in the human population, you
don't really need an ever-present animal reservoir," Fauci said.
"There's enough spread among humans that it is more likely to
establish itself as a smoldering reservoir in humans."
No other diseases are exactly comparable to SARS, but it could
develop a seasonal pattern like flu.
One of the key determinants is the unresolved question of exactly
how the SARS virus spreads. While the primary mode is believed to be
close personal contact, the virus did sweep rapidly through an
apartment tower and hotel in Hong Kong in ways that remain unclear.
"There are enough of these outliers to tell us that we don't know
what the full potential is," Fauci said. "There is something unusual
and beyond the scope of face-to-face contact."
During the weekend, the WHO said SARS appears to have been more
severe in the Hong Kong apartment building outbreak than elsewhere
and sickened more younger, otherwise healthy people. That raises
fears the virus may have mutated into an even more dangerous form,
the WHO said.
Another key unknown is whether the disease can be spread when
people have no symptoms.
"If that's the case, and there are thousands and thousands of
people who have gotten infected and not gotten sick, then it
amplifies greater the possibility of persistent human infection,"
Fauci said.
That's why officials have made developing an accurate diagnostic
test the highest priority.
"This is a disease that is now probably endemic in China. It's
definitely an epidemic in Hong Kong, as it is in Toronto," said
Donald Low of Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto. "Patients will carry
it to other countries and introduce it into new countries. Some of
those countries will be able to respond adequately and other
countries won't have the resources or expertise. It's bleak. It
really is bleak."
© 2003 The Washington Post Company
|