Depending on source, a vaccine for SARS could be here in only a few
months, or a year, or it might take years. It might also never appear and,
even if it does, it might never be widely used because it might do more
harm than good. Whatever the time line, though, it will be expensive.
Typically, say experts, vaccines are developed over years and cost around
$US100 million -- but not all microbes can be treated with vaccines,
meaning an endless research cycle, similar to work on the HIV/AIDS virus.
Vaccine a year away:
According to Julie Gerberding, director of the Centres
for Disease Control and Prevention in the US -- the agency with the global
lead on medical issues surrounding SARS -- a vaccine is "at least a year
away."
Although media sources jumped on the "year" part of her statement, the CDC
has consistently been less optimistic about the development time for a
SARS vaccine.
In Pakistan, one scientist said it would probably take
3-10 years to develop a SARS vaccine if it followed normal development
procedures.
Vaccine only months away: On the other hand,
according to Yuan Zhenghong, the director of a
Shanghai-based national key laboratory under the Ministry of Health, both
a vaccine and specialised treatment drugs will be available within the
"coming few months." Yuan's projection was reported by the English version
of state-run People's Daily, which used the announcement to reinforce
early demands that officials stop hiding cases. "Officials who delay
reporting of cases, cover up the extent of the epidemic or neglect their
responsibilities in fighting the disease will be punished according to the
law, said Xiao Donglou, deputy director of the Department of Disease
Control with the Ministry of Health," the story says.
Local authorities have been granted exceptional powers as China musters
itself to the fight. The People's Daily story says:
Meanwhile, governments at various levels are authorized by the
law to take emergency measures to limit or stop markets, gatherings,
performances or other major public activities, Xiao said.
They can also close down industries, businesses and classes,
temporarily take over homes and vehicles, and isolate public water
supplies polluted by infectious diseases.
It goes on to outline types of aid China seeks -- and is willing to
accept -- from outsiders:
The Ministry of Civil Affairs, the Ministry of Health, the Red
Cross Society of China (RCSC), and China Charity Federation will
collect the donations.
Donations can include disinfectants, anti-SARS medicines and medical
equipment as well as money, RCSC official Wang Baoming told China
Daily Monday.
To make a donation, call the Ministry of Civil Affairs, (8610)
85203158/3159; the Ministry of Health, (8610) 68792177/2155; the
RCSC, (8610) 65139999/5933; and the China Charity Federation, (8610)
66083260.
The story also contains perhaps the best one-liner about China's
struggle with SARS to make print: A WHO expert suggested the Beijing
Municipality further strengthen its surveillance system and enhance
investigation of sporadic cases. "(The fight against SARS) is a war, we
need little spies to find out where to shoot,'' he said.
WHO agrees with both estimates: The World Health Organisation is of
what appears to be a dual mind about the timeline for developing a vaccine
against SARS. According to an AP report, an unnamed senior official
says that, while a vaccine could be developed within months, it could be
two or three years before it was ready to use on humans.
But, possibly, never -- especially in practice:
According to Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, there may never be
a vaccine against SARS. "There is never, ever, a guarantee that you are
going to develop a successful vaccine against a microbe. That is just a
scientific fact of life," he said.
The problem is more complex than most realise, researchers are now saying,
and vaccines, even when they do work, have negative side-effects that may
inhibity their use in the general population.
According to Dr. James Campbell of the University of Maryland School of
Medicines Center for Vaccine Development, "No vaccine is without adverse
effects."
"It is a matter of balancing the public health need against that risk," he
said.
Canada weighs in with call for funds, cooperation: Whatever the
user risk, a vaccine is the only way the disease will be stopped, say
scientists in Canada who are looking to form Government-subsidised
collective research efforts.
"I don't think this disease can be eradicated in China and the developing
countries in general by quarantine and isolation,"
says Dr. Frank Plummer of the National Microbiology
Laboratory in Winnipeg. And without a vaccine, he says fatalities will
continue since few developing countries have access to enough intensive
care equipment and ventilators to handle SARS outbreaks. "In countries
like China, India, Africa," says Dr. Plummer, "there isn't the kind of
sophisticated intensive care that is required to get people through the
most severe parts of SARS."
The Canadians have already stumped up an emergency $C500,000 fund for SARS
research and scientists involved in the effort hope to get government
regulators, pharmaceutical companies and scientists all working together
rather than in competing, shilo-type laboratory efforts.
Some reckon that, with adequate funding, that sort of effort could develop
a vaccine within a year -- but not that the development of a vaccine
typically is a multi-year process costing around $C100 million.
Dr. Bhagirath Singh, scientific director of the federal Institute of
Infection and Immunity, which supplied the $C500,000, said what was now in
the pot is "just seed money," and that, "Unless there is money on the
table it won't happen."
Following the China/ASEAN lead: The collaborative Canadian route is
also striking a responsive chord with the ASEAN leaders gathered in
Bangkok to hash out common strategies.
China has kick-started a collaborative research effort with a donation of
about $US1 million and other nations are also likely to contribute.
But, according to ABC News' man-on-the-scene, the ASEAN initiative may
be more about puff than powder.
In a transcript of a television news broadcast, correspondent Peter Lloyd
said:
The Chinese are putting in around $2 million Australian.
There is about $1 million Australian coming from Thailand and
slightly less from Cambodia so it doesn't really amount to very
much.
It is I think more symbolic than substantial.
What the leaders here are saying is they want the WHO and CDC in
Atlanta and governments of non-affected SARS countries to start
putting their intellectual and financial efforts into trying to find
a cure for SARS.
But not one cure fits all: Finally, some researchers believe
that the SARS virus is mutating so rapidly and profoundly that any single
vaccine will not address the problem effectively.
Arthur Van Langerberg, a virologist at Canossa
hospital in Hong Kong, told Italy's La Republica on 21 April that even if
researchers found a vaccine in the next six months it was unlikely to be
effective since the virus would probably have mutated in the meantime.