Spread of AIDS in Africa driven by poor medical practice, report says
Owen Dyer London
The spread of AIDS in Africa is driven not by unsafe sex but by unsafe
medical practice, according to research published last week.
The research, which analysed data on new infections collected up to 1988,
concludes that no basis exists for the widespread belief that sexual
transmission is responsible for over 90% of new cases. Instead, the authors say,
use of dirty needles by public health services was the main cause of
transmission in the study period, with sexual transmission accounting for just
30% of infections.
In three articles, lead authors David Gisselquist, a private consultant
anthropologist from Pennsylvania, and Dr John Potterat, an infectious diseases
specialist from Colorado, point out numerous anomalies in the relation between
risky sexual behaviour and prevalence of HIV (International Journal of STD &
AIDS 2003;14:144-147, 148-61, 162-73)
In one study cited by the authors, Yaounde in Cameroon had a high level of
risky behavioural markers yet a low and stable prevalence of HIV. Ndola in
Zambia had the smallest proportion of both men and women who reported having had
sex in the previous 12 months with someone who was not their spouse, yet it
experienced a rapid rise in HIV.
Another apparent inconsistency in the sexual transmission model, says the
group, is the continued reporting of HIV infection in the young children of
seronegative mothers. A South African study found HIV in 6% of children aged 2
to 14 years, a figure too high to explain by maternal transmission alone (www.hsrc.ac.za/research/npa/SAHA/news/20021205Keynote.html).
Another study found that HIV positive children had received more injections than
uninfected children (Lancet 1986;ii:1103-4).
The authors point to the exceptionally rapid spread of the disease in
countries with widespread health services, such as South Africa and Zimbabwe. In
Zimbabwe in the 1990s, HIV infections increased by 12% a year whereas other
sexually transmitted disease were declining by 25%.
The research has been greeted frostily by other experts in the field, who say
it could drive patients away from needed health care and send the message that
unprotected sex is not dangerous. Dr Cate Hankins of UNAIDS said: "Im sure they
mean well, but I dont think theyve thought out the public health implications
of what theyre saying.
"All our evidence suggests that dirty needles account for about 5% of HIV
transmission in the developing world. I dont think theyve brought anything new
to discredit that. However, were going to hold a consultation and review the
evidence." She said that recall bias could account for many of the discrepancies
noted in the study.
Professor Michael Adler of University College London Medical School said:
"Its true there was a problem with infected needles in the 1980s, but it was
nowhere near as big a factor as they suggest. If that many needles were dirty,
wed be seeing far higher rates of hepatitis than we are, because hepatitis is
much more easily transmitted by injection than HIV."
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"