Fears Raised Over Possible Mutant Mumps in Britain
Reuters Health
By Pat Hagan
Thursday, January 9, 2003
LONDON (Reuters Health) - A public health doctor has uncovered what he
believes may be evidence of a mutant mumps virus circulating in Britain.
Dr. Brendan Crowley, from Liverpool Public Health Laboratory, said two recent
unusual cases of mumps infection raise the possibility that a new strain has
developed that may be resistant to the current mumps vaccine.
In a report in the journal Communicable Disease and Public Health, Crowley
suggests the emergence of mutant forms of the virus could account for some of
the recent resurgence in mumps infection in the UK. He also believes it's
possible that, after years of exposure to the strain used to make mumps
vaccines, this mutant form may have learned to evade detection by the body's
immune system.
The report describes the case of a mother and son who both developed the
infection, even though earlier tests confirmed she was immune and her
11-year-old child had already been vaccinated or infected.
"I'm just putting this idea forward because there was something very
different about the strain involved," he told Reuters Health in an interview.
"We need to ask whether it is possible it could be a mutant strain."
Mumps was once a common infection in Britain and is characterised by swelling
of the lymph nodes on the side of the neck, making the face look round and
swollen.
In many cases, the infection is mild but it can also cause fever, headache
and muscle pains. In the worst instances, it can lead to deafness and
inflammation of the testicles, ovaries or pancreas.
Before vaccinations were introduced, it was also one of the leading causes of
life-threatening viral meningitis in children.
Over the last 18 months, there have been a number of mumps outbreaks, mainly
involving teenagers who missed out on the measles, mumps, rubella vaccine when
it was introduced in 1988 or failed to get enough doses of single mumps vaccine
to develop immunity.
The latest figures from the Public Health Laboratory Service show there were
131 cases of mumps in England and Wales in the first quarter of 1992, the last
period for which figures are available, compared to 115 in the same quarter of
2001.
Around 70% of the cases involved teenagers born between 1983 and 1990.
Crowley raised the alarm after discovering "an unusual antibody response" in
the mother of the infected child.
The 11-year-old boy had been admitted to hospital, where doctors confirmed
mumps infection and discharged him after a short course of treatment. Ten days
later his 44-year-old mother developed facial swelling, which her doctor
confirmed was also mumps.
Blood tests showed the boy had either been vaccinated or infected already,
which should have meant he had some protection against reinfection.
Meanwhile, the mother, a healthcare worker, had given a blood sample a year
earlier that showed she too was carrying mumps antibodies, probably as a result
of earlier infection.
"I was really surprised because when we tested the mother's first blood
sample for antibodies it was positive," Crowley told Reuters Health. "She should
have been immune to mumps but she still developed the symptoms."
Further tests also showed her immune system responded completely differently
to the virus than her son's--even though they were infected with the same
strain. She produced high levels of antibodies to a strain of mumps known as the
G genotype--which is not included in the current vaccine.
"It may simply reflect genetics because people vary in their response to
viral infections. But it's also possible there's something very different about
this strain," Crowley said. "The G genotype is one that's only appeared in the
last seven or eight years and it's certainly not in the vaccine strain."
Dr. Mary Ramsay, consultant epidemiologist at the Public Health Laboratory
Service, said there was no evidence that mutant mumps strains were responsible
for the rise in cases. However, she said it is possible there are mutant strains
circulating that are not particularly virulent and cause very few infections.
"There will always be some element of mutation in a virus. What matters is
whether it persists in the general population and that does not seem to be a
problem with this infection."
SOURCE: Communicable Disease and Public Health 2002;5:311-313.
Copyright 2002 Reuters. Reuters content is the
intellectual property of Reuters. Any copying, republication or redistribution
of Reuters content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be
liable for any errors or delays in content, or for any actions taken in reliance
thereon. Reuters, the Reuters Dotted Logo and the Sphere Logo are registered
trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"