Anecdotes suggest that some bacteria have lost their
resistance to older antibiotics
Recent reports have lent support to the potential use of previous generation
antibacterial drugs to treat infections causedby new resistant
bacteria. The Morbidity and Mortality WeeklyReport recently
described two isolates from the United Statesof vancomycin resistant
Staphylococcus aureus with a minimum inhibitoryconcentration
32 µg/ml, both of which were found
to be sensitivein vitro to co-trimoxazole as well as to other older
antimicrobials. 12
Co-trimoxazole was successfully used to treat one of these patients.1Unpublished data from our institution and elsewhere3
show thatin the last 15 years isolates of methicillin resistant S
aureus(MRSA) have progressively, and by now almost universally,
becomesusceptible to co-trimoxazole. Preliminary data indicate thatthis drug can be used as an alternative to vancomycin to treat
infections due to MRSA4 and include a case report
about co-trimoxazolebeing used successfully to treat a patient with
endocarditis thatfailed to respond to linezolid.5
Chloramphenicol, a drug introduced 50 years ago and essentially abandoned in
the past three decades, has been reintroducedrecently to treat
severe infections caused by vancomycin resistantenterococci.6
A report from India describes the re-emergenceof susceptibility to
chloramphenicol in Salmonella typhi isolatesthat are
increasingly resistant to quinolones and
lactams.7The authors suggest reintroducing this drug to treat typhoid
fever.
In a recent report from France, Stein and Raoult used colistin, an old and
rarely used antibiotic, to treat bone infectionscaused by a strain
of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with resistance toall other
antibiotics tested.8 The same drug has been usedto treat infections caused by multiresistant strains of Acinetobacterbaumannii.9 Sulbactam, a drug introduced
in the early 1980s,is increasingly being used for the same purpose.10
As an alternativeto third generation cephalosporins and vancomycin,
high dosesof penicillin are being proposed to treat pneumococcal
infectionscaused by strains with intermediate levels of penicillin
resistance(minimum inhibitory concentration 4-8 µg/ml).11
Despite extensive research the pace of development of antibacterial drugs has
not kept up with the increase in bacterial resistance.As more and
more organisms develop resistance, concern is growingthat we may be
approaching the end of the antibiotic era. Theintensive use and
excessive abuse of antibiotics have resultedin the selection of
bacteria that are resistant to many and sometimesall antibiotics.
For unclear reasons, these multiresistant organismseither retain or
regain susceptibility to certainantimicrobials.
Measures to counter the threat of rapidly escalating antimicrobial resistance
include surveillance of susceptibility to andconsumption of
antibiotics, rational use of antibiotics, bettercompliance with
measures to control infection, and increasingdevelopment and use ofvaccines.
Are we reverting to the pre-antibiotic era or advancing into the
post-antibiotic era? One of the crucial questions is whetherthe
above mentioned examples will remain anecdotal or whethera real
chance exists for the strategic use of forgotten drugson a large
enough scale to affect clinicalmanagement.
The recovery of sensitivity to specific antimicrobials by pathogenic bacteria
is a complex issue. Two important factors determinerates of
resistant bacteria in a specific communitythe
"human"factor, which is the amount of antimicrobials used, and the
"biological"factor, which is the burden that the resistance encoding
genesimpose on the fitness of the bacteria.12
The impact of either the discontinuation or the reintroduction of a specific
drug on the rate of resistance will differ forvarious
microorganisms. In addition to the information obtainedfrom
mathematical models of population dynamics,12
continuoussurveillance of in vitro susceptibility will inform us
about theeffect of reintroducing older drugs. In some instances,
resistancecould rapidly re-emerge owing to the presence of low rates
ofresistant genes in a population that once was predominantly
resistant.In the future, older antimicrobials will be relied on more
andmore, either as isolated "no other choice" options or as partof a programmed policy of antibioticcycling.
Silvio Pitlik.
Department of Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Rabin Medical Center, 49100 Petah
Tiqva, Israel (spitlik@clalit.org.il)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Public health
dispatch: vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusPennsylvania,
2002. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep MMWR 2002; 51: 902.
Denis O, Deplano A, Nonhoff C, de Ryck R, Rottieres S,
Hendricks E, et al. Molecular epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility
of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Belgian hospitals:
2001. 42nd ICAAC Abstracts. In: San Diego: American Society for
Microbiology, 2002:305.
Markowitz N, Quinn EL, Saravolatz LD.
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole compared with vancomycin for the treatment of
Staphylococcus aureus infection. Ann Intern Med 1992; 117: 390-398[ISI][Medline].
Lautenbach E, Schuster MG, Bilker WB, Brennan PJ. The role
of chloramphenicol in the treatment of bloodstream infection due to
vancomycin-resistant enterococcus. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 27:
1259-1265[ISI][Medline].
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"