By Linda Rosenstock Special to the Los Angeles Times
It may come as a surprise to some that we dont make health
policy in the United States based on portentous warnings from behind closed
doors. There is actually a science to calculating risk. Making such sweeping
decisions as President Bush has done on smallpox vaccination keeping the
public and experts in the dark is simply indefensible.
The limited support of medical and public health professional organizations
for the vaccination campaign may lead people to surmise, incorrectly, that the
mainstream of expert opinion is behind the president.
In fact, public health experts involved in consultation on the
recommendation, or those like me observing from outside the federal
decision-making apparatus, might have come to a wholly different conclusion had
the starting premise been a different one than assume there is a credible and
small but finite risk of near-term intentional exposure. In other words: You
health experts design a plan based on information we may or may not have but
cannot share with you.
This potentially false starting premise and the implication that the risk
now is sufficiently greater than it was before the Sept. 11 attacks to warrant a
wholesale new approach to one of many potential biological hazards takes on a
life of its own.
Each state is mandated to design its smallpox vaccination strategy.
The debate at the national level shifts from whether anyone should be
vaccinated to who among those most at risk should be vaccinated and in what
order.
Which part of the military? Which medical and emergency response personnel?
And once on this slippery slope, the truly extraordinary recommendation emerges
that all civilians be given the option to be vaccinated.
This particular recommendation reverses established public health policy that
once a clear public benefit exists, taking into account known risk as with
routine childhood immunizations then the goal is universal coverage.
And we learn from Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy G. Thompson that
the smallpox vaccine will be provided to everyone free.
Would that the administration provide vaccines of known value such as for
measles, mumps and rubella to the population at no cost. But that is a different
discussion.
So is there anything prudent we can do to prepare for possible germ warfare?
Of course there is. First, the public deserves a clear explanation from the
administration about the evidence of a threat.
We deserve to know what they know.
If the risk is dramatically close to zero, as many of us in the health field
believe, then a prudent course would be to continue as we are doing: working
rapidly to manufacture a safer vaccine than now exists, to be available when and
if the risk determination changes.
This is a credible course given the knowledge that smallpox does not spread
as rapidly as many other infectious agents and there is a window of reasonable
time (probably four days) when post-exposure vaccination is still effective.
If a credible, finite risk, even if small, can be convincingly established,
then there will be honest disagreement among scientists and experts about the
next best steps.
The debate will hinge on when to begin a vaccination campaign, before or
after a documented case. And then the discussion, if we choose to proceed with
pre-exposure vaccination, will rightly hinge on who should be vaccinated.
For now, we have not been provided with convincing evidence that any American
should be.
Rosenstock, a physician, is dean of the University of California,
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"