|
Pediatricians call for more
action on phthalates
By Keith Mulvihill
Last Updated:
2003-06-04 16:36:51 -0400 (Reuters Health)
NEW YORK
(Reuters Health) - An organization of U.S. pediatricians
is calling for further research into the effects on
children of chemicals used to make fragrances last
longer and soften plastic in toys and medical tubes.
The
chemicals, known as phthalates, have been linked in
previous studies to birth defects and other harmful
effects in animals, according to the report, published
in the June issue of Pediatrics, the journal of the
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).
The AAP's
Committee on Environmental Health notes in the report
that "no studies have been performed to evaluate human
toxicity from exposure to these compounds."
The impetus
to do the report was a study published by the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that found that
some people have very high levels of phthalates in their
blood, explained Dr. Michael W. Shannon, a member of the
AAP committee.
Shannon also
noted that media attention about phthalates is likely to
have parents asking questions and expressing concern.
"We wanted to
make sure that pediatricians are educated and are able
to advocate for children's health," Shannon said in an
interview with Reuters Health.
In the
report, lead author Dr. Katherine M. Shea and other
members of the committee note that two phthalates, DEHP
and DINP, are of particular concern "because of their
known toxicities and the potential for significant
exposure in sensitive populations."
Specifically,
concern is especially high for premature infants in
intensive care units, where they may be exposed to DEHP
in plastic medical tubing and bags, explained Shannon,
who noted that these infants are immature both
developmentally and physiologically.
As such,
Shannon said, "we very much want to see more research
conducted."
Commenting on
the report, Marian Stanley, manager of the Phthalate
Ester Panel at the American Chemistry Council said, "the
report ... is incomplete and unjustifiably alarmist,
because the report does not include significant recent
research findings."
But Shea
countered that she and the members of the committee took
into account all published information available at the
time the report was being written.
In response
to the criticism of being alarmist, Shea said, "nowhere
in the document do we say or imply that parents should
take any specific actions. Rather we suggest that
pediatricians should become educated and participate in
the process of determining what is safe for children."
And she notes
that a main goal in writing the report was to educate
pediatricians about the complexity of determining and
quantifying risks to children from chemical exposures,
using phthalates as examples, and to prepare them to be
active participants in the process.
"So far the
exposure data on phthalates in young children is
incomplete and while the toxicity data is pretty good,
it's in animals not babies," said Shea.
"I don't
think anyone knows all the answers, but we need to be
health protective and eliminate unnecessary exposures
and, when possible, minimize medical exposures,
especially in premature infants in intensive care," Shea
told Reuters Health.
In December
last year the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
told medical professional societies that certain devices
may expose people to a toxic dose of DEHP. The agency
said at the time DEHP might be found in IV bags and
tubing, blood bags, nasogastric tubes, dialysis bags and
tubing, and other tubing used to support and feed
premature infants.
The FDA
advised that, if available, alternatives to phthalates
should be should be used to keep plastics soft.
So far, the
U.S. government has declined to ban the use of
phthalates. The European Union banned their use in some
products, including baby toys, in 1999. In the U.S. and
Canada all phthalates have been voluntarily removed from
infant bottle nipples, teethers and toys intended to go
into an infant's mouth.
Copyright 2002 Reuters.
|