|
By STEPHANIE NANO : Associated Press Writer
Jun 5, 2003 : 11:37 am ET
A study of twins suggests early puberty may
trigger the development of breast cancer in women who are already at
unusually high risk because of their genetic makeup.
A women's risk of breast cancer is believed
to be linked to her lifelong exposure to the sex hormone estrogen,
with slight increases for those who start menstruating early, reach
menopause late, never have children or have them late.
However, the new study suggests that going
through puberty early may be especially ominous for some women.
For women genetically predisposed to get the
disease, the rush of hormones at puberty alone -- rather than
long-term exposure -- may result in breast cancer later in life,
according to the study from the University of Southern California at
Los Angeles.
"There's a lot we don't know about the causes
of breast cancer, but what we need to know ... is where to look,"
said researcher Ann S. Hamilton. "This provides some more clues
about a different approach in looking for genetic factors."
The findings appear in Thursday's New England
Journal of Medicine.
The study looked at 1,811 sets of identical
and fraternal female twins. In each set, one or both twins had
breast cancer. The researchers asked about their age at puberty and
menopause, pregnancies and other risk factors and looked for
patterns.
One thing stood out: For identical twins with
cancer, the first twin to reach puberty was five times more likely
to get the disease first. The link was even stronger when
menstruation began early, before the age of 12. Other factors -- a
later age at menopause, fewer children and a later first pregnancy
-- made no difference.
Since identical twins share genes, the
researchers assume there was a hereditary reason behind the
vulnerability to the onset of hormones. Scientists so far have
discovered a few gene mutations that increase the risk of breast
cancer.
While the focus has been on genes related to
estrogen levels, Hamilton said, the study suggests also looking for
genes that affect the sensitivity of immature breast cells at
puberty.
Patricia Hartge of the National Cancer
Institute, who wrote an accompanying editorial, said the study was
provocative but its conclusions would have to be repeated in other
studies. The study was partly funded by the institute.
"If we begin to understand how the hormone
and gene go together to later increase the risk of breast cancer ...
we probably could figure out how to intervene," she said.
Dr. JoAnn Manson of Harvard's Brigham and
Women's Hospital said the implications of the study are worrisome
given the gradual decline in the age of puberty in the United States
and the rise in childhood obesity. Body fat can stimulate hormones.
If the findings are correct, "There's even
more impetus to try to reverse this epidemic of obesity in
children," Manson said.
|