NOTE from the
person that forwarded this article:
The following news item is based on the profoundly discredited claim that
testing positive for antibodies for "HIV" and/or "hepC" are proof of infection
with an "HI-virus and/or a hepC-virus. Both tests are non-specific and indicate
high levels of antigenic stress and high levels of antigenic stress are
associated with many health problems.--Michael Ellner
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - Thousands of hemophiliacs filed a class-action lawsuit
against Bayer Corp. and other companies, claiming they exposed patients to HIV
and hepatitis C by selling products made with blood from sick, high-risk donors.
The lawsuits, filed in federal court, alleges the companies continued
distributing the blood-clotting products in Asia and Latin America in 1984 and
1985, even after they stopped selling them in the United States because of the
known risk of HIV and hepatitis transmission.
The suit was filed Monday on behalf of hemophiliacs who received the drug,
said attorney Robert Nelson.
"This is a worldwide tragedy," Nelson said. "Thousands of hemophiliacs have
unnecessarily died from AIDS and many thousands more are infected with HIV or
hepatitis C."
In Germany, Bayer declined to comment Tuesday on the suit, saying it had not
yet received the relevant documents. Baxter Healthcare Corp., also named in the
lawsuit, did not immediately return calls seeking comment after business hours
Monday.
The lawsuit was filed less than two weeks after Bayer responded to an
investigation by The New York Times accusing the company of selling old stock of
the medicine abroad, while marketing a newer, safer product in the United
States.
While the company said it acted responsibly and in line with the best medical
knowledge at the time, Bayer and three other companies that made the concentrate
settled 15 years of U.S. lawsuits from people who took the drug, paying about
$600 million, the newspaper said.
The medicine, called Factor VIII concentrate, can stop or prevent potentially
fatal bleeding in people with hemophilia.
Early in the AIDS epidemic, the medicine was commonly made using mingled
plasma from 10,000 or more donors. Because there was not yet a screening test
for HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, thousands of hemophiliacs were infected.
But the lawsuit alleges Bayer and the others refused to take precautions that
could have made the product safer.
As of 1992, the contaminated blood products had infected at least 5,000
hemophiliacs in Europe with HIV. More than 2,000 had already developed AIDS and
1,250 had died from the disease, the lawsuit said.
By the mid-1990s in Japan, hemophiliacs accounted for the majority of the
country's 4,000 reported cases of HIV infection and virtually all infections of
Japan's hemophiliacs have been linked to contaminated blood products imported
from the United States, the lawsuit said.
In Latin America, at least 700 HIV cases are linked to use of contaminated
blood products by hemophiliacs, the lawsuit said.
If my memory serves me correctly, the tainted Arkansas blood from the prisons
was sold into Canada and much evidence was clearly documented -- they knew they
couldn't sell it to the U.S., so they exported it. Sick...... Don't remember
anything about Bayer being involved.
If my memory serves me correctly, the tainted Arkansas blood from the prisons
was sold into Canada and much evidence was clearly documented -- they knew they
couldn't sell it to the U.S., so they exported it.
Your memory does serve correctly. Interestingly, the building that held the
records that were to be examined to trace the responsiility for selling the
blood burned down mysteriously with all the evidence inside.
Hopefully Bayer will lose their collective shirt in this suit. I find it
strange that they continued to sell the blood products to the little brown and
yellow people after they stopped selling it to the tall white blonde
people...NOT.
This blood business is old news. The plaintiffs in this class action were
parties to a 1996-97 class action and more than 6000 of them were paid $100,000
a person (more than $600 million in total). Others maintained private lawsuits
(more than 400 of them) and all have now been resolved. This has nothing to do
with Clinton and Arkansas. This California lawyer is a Johnny come lately
(likely a Dem) who is looking to pick up a fee to go away.
This could certainly lead toward clinton and the Arkansas prison blood
scandal, but it's not clear whether the plaintiffs have that intent. There's one
sentence I find interesting:
"As of 1992, the contaminated blood products had infected at least 5,000
hemophiliacs in Europe with HIV."
As we all know, 1992 was a politically significant date. There's no explanation
why the article chooses that particular date for its statistics.
Dumping scandal: THE EXPORT OF BAD BLOOD ... The plasma was sold on the 'spot' market," explains
Mike Galster, the author of
a fictional account, called "BloodTrail," about the Arkansas
Department of ...
www.freerepublic.com/forum/a36d55c246e57.htm - 22k -
Cached -
Similar pages
23 posted on 06/03/2003 8:28 AM PDT
by backhoe (Bill Clinton? Why, he's the best
President money could buy! ( heard on the street circa 1997...))
[ Post Reply |
Private Reply |
To 1
| View Replies ]
To: backhoe
Backhoe: FR's master cataloguer. :)
(I bookmark many of your links). Thank you again.
24 posted on 06/03/2003 9:12 AM PDT
by cgk (Bob Geldof: "President Bush is
radical, in a positive sense. Clinton just screwed everybody.")
[ Post Reply |
Private Reply |
To 23
| View Replies ]
To: cgk
Thanks for looking- that was just a fast grab of links; many of my older ones
seem to be dead. It will at least be a starting point.
26 posted on 06/03/2003 9:19 AM PDT
by cgk (Bob Geldof: "President Bush is
radical, in a positive sense. Clinton just screwed everybody.")
[ Post Reply |
Private Reply |
To 25
| View Replies ]
Yes. This is a follow-up on Bayer's Cutter Laboraties, which knowingly
exported contaminated blood products. Story was on the New York Times front page
a couple of weeks ago -- just about five years after WE broke it in this forum.
34 posted on 06/03/2003 5:27 PM PDT
by backhoe (Bill Clinton? Why, he's the best
President money could buy! ( heard on the street circa 1997...))
[ Post Reply |
Private Reply |
To 33
| View Replies ]
To: backhoe
A whole lot of dirt in those articles, and you will know what to do with
them.
Dave, I first heard about the Blood Trail tale in 1997- think it was the
Washington Times that carried the first story I ever saw. I really thought that
the media would have to forget their worship of the Clintons and cover it- it
had crime, arson, AIDS- plenty of hot button issues.
But once again, they protected their cheap little tin god, and cheapened
themselves further by doing so.
Be that as it may, I'll sure use your link & information. We have to keep
reminding people of the rot & corruption America endured for 8 sorry years.
I heard about it in England before the pressitutes here ever admitted there
was a problem. Then the Canadian Press tried. The NY Slimes, other fishwraps and
ABCNNBCBS ignored the problem and spiked the stories.
I read some time ago that a class action suit was settled long ago for many
millions(close to a billion dollars)
Bayer is on the hit list apparently and is being (asbestossed!)
I read last year that a machine defect caused a undermined amount of
contaminates to be sold in some products. This story seems like a mixture of the
two events that were years apart.
I am now totally confused and have opened up a cold beer.
"I read some time ago that a class action suit was settled long ago for many
millions(close to a billion dollars)"
"Bayer is on the hit list apparently and is being (asbestossed!)"
The German Bayer Company has been in deep dodo for a few years now.
If I recall it was 3-4 years ago when they came out with a new cholesteral
lowering drug called BAYCOL. There was some problem with it and it killed about
50-100 people. I had a couple of friends whose doctors for no reason switched
them from the cholesteral medication they were on to the BAYCOL.
After a few weeks their muscles hurt so bad and it was getting where they
weren't able to do anything. They thought back and realized this started
happening about the time the doctor switched their medicine and then something
came out in the paper about Baycol. They immediately stopped taking it or they
could have ended up one of the dead.
The class action suit you are refering to may be from the BAYCOL class action
suit.
Linda Miller's site. She's a friend/member of this forum and of the
Bloodhound group, and in fact, she met with us in Hot Springs, AK while we
pursued this story. Linda worked so hard on this, it wore her out, but she's
okay now. Note her many links to us Bloodhounds in FR.
> Dave, I first heard about the Blood Trail tale in 1997
You're a little early. I'm virtually certain the story broke in August, 1998
-- right here in Free Republic -- timed for the arrival of the first copies of
Blood Trail fresh from the printer. It was picked up in Canada and in a
column by Maggie Gallagher that still poses an intriguing question, and there
was a WTimes column soon after too, but I can't recall who wrote it (tip of my
tongue, but...)
The story never really got picked up, despite all the labors of the Free
Republic Bloodhounds. Clinton was and probably still is immune to exposure of
his crimes in the liberal media.
> This has nothing to do with Clinton and Arkansas.
It may very well go back to the Clinton tainted blood scandal, due to
oddities in the law. American blood fractionaters were not permitted to work
with prison blood plasma, but it was legal to do it in Canada (Connaught
Laboratories, Cutter), and legal to reimport it to the U.S. There was a lot of
traffic in prison plasma up to Canada and back, for years. Some of it moved in
channels thought to be mob-linked. If this (posted) story refers to the
incidents reported in the New York Times recently, then yes, this is very
probably Arkansas (or other southern) prison plasma and Clinton was certainly
involved with the scam.
Suzi wrote this in a Washington, D.C. hotel room late at night, ignoring a
fair amount of kibitzing and harassment from the several gentlemen present. The
larger occasion was Mike Galster's press conference at the National Press Club
February 24, 1999, at which he outlined the Blood Trail story and introduced a
number of its Canadian victims (AIDS, Hep C or both), their Canadian and
American lawyers, Canadian MP Grant Hill (an outspoken supporter of compensation
for the tainted blood victims), top spokesmen for both the American and Canadian
(BigM) hemophiliac groups; present also were a few other interested bystanders
(Wallaby, T'wit, Rikki Magnussen as a reporter).
You may be right- I'd have to find & dig through my anti-clinton scrapbook of
newspaper clippings to be certain... I still have the first Washington Times
article saved, but am not positive about the date.
The book was published in 1998 -- I had a look -- and I myself immediately
ran a book review in FR along with a tiny paid ad elsewhere. Maggie Gallagher
very quickly added in a detail unknown to Mike Galster and the future
Bloodhounds, from her friend Linda Tripp. Namely, that a day or two after Vince
Foster's death, somebody called the White House legal office (not the main
switchboard, so this guy was an insider) -- Linda took the call -- and said that
what was bothering Foster was an issue of contaminated blood. Given that detail
-- which Tripp later put on the public record in a deposition -- and evidence
that Foster was about to break, we developed a strong suspicion that he got
eliminated before he could talk about the Blood Trail. Iow, the deadly
contaminated blood was the issue -- one unsuspected in all previous
investigations and propaganda. This happens to be the way Mike portrayed it in
Blood Trail -- but that was pure fiction, before he had the evidence from Tripp.
Amazing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those
of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free
Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by
copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
DISCLAIMER: All
information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for
general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the
knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended
as providing medical or legal advice. The decision whether or not to vaccinate
is an important and complex issue and should be made by you, and you alone, in
consultation with your health care provider.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"