Schering-Plough, the drug maker already hurt by government investigations and
declining sales, said yesterday it expects to be indicted on charges stemming
from a criminal investigation by federal prosecutors in Massachusetts.
The probe centers on allegations the Kenilworth company paid doctors and
health care plans to get them to prescribe its medicines and then later
destroyed documents and obstructed the government inquiry, according to a
statement.
Schering-Plough, best known as the manufacturer of the allergy medicine
Claritin, said it received a letter this week from the U.S. Attorney's Office in
Boston saying it is a "target" of a criminal investigation. The letter means the
government intends to seek an indictment and has "substantial evidence," the
company said.
"When you are a target, it means the government is looking to indict you,"
said John Fahy, a criminal defense attorney in Hackensack and a former federal
prosecutor.
An indictment and conviction could mean hundreds of millions of dollars in
fines and probably means employees could face charges, experts said.
The sales and marketing practices of several top pharmaceutical companies
have been the subject of various government investigations and lawsuits by
consumer groups. But it is unusual for these investigations to result in an
indictment like the one Schering-Plough is facing.
"Everybody is being investigated. These guys just stepped to the front of the
line," said Richard Evans, a senior research analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein &
Co. in New York.
Denise Foy, a Schering-Plough spokesman, declined comment other than to say
the company is cooperating with prosecutors. The company employs 6,800 in New
Jersey.
Samantha Martin, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney's Office in Boson,
declined comment.
On Wall Street, Schering-Plough shares fell 45 cents, or 2.4 percent, to
$18.45 in heavy trading.
The looming indictment is the latest setback for Schering-Plough.
Just last month the company hired a new chief executive officer -- Fred
Hassan, formerly the CEO at rival Pharmacia Corp. -- in an effort to reverse a
downward spiral over the past two years that prompted former CEO Richard Kogan
to step down.
Last year, Schering-Plough agreed to pay a record $500 million in fines to
the Food and Drug Administration to resolve manufacturing problems. Meanwhile,
it faces other investigations while trying to revive a business significantly
hurt by the expiration of Claritin's patent and the introduction of cheaper
generic versions.
In its statement, Schering-Plough said the investigation focuses on whether
it provided drug samples, research grants or other "items of value" to
physicians or managed-care organizations to get them to prescribe
Schering-Plough medicines.
Investigators are also reviewing whether Schering-Plough improperly promoted
medicines for uses other than those approved by the FDA and submitted false
pricing information to the government.
The federal government is involved in this latest investigation because
Medicaid, the government health program for the poor, eventually paid for the
medicines.
In other similar cases, drug companies have been accused of providing doctors
with free samples of medicines and telling them how to get reimbursed by
Medicaid. Companies have been also accused of paying kickbacks or offering free
trips to get them to prescribe their medicines.
"They not only get kickbacks to prescribe a certain company's drugs, but the
drug company is not even paying the kickback -- the taxpayers are," said Ahaviah
Glaser, director of Prescription Access Litigation in Boston, which has filed a
number of lawsuits against major pharmaceutical companies, including
Schering-Plough.
In November, Schering-Plough said it received subpoenas from the U.S.
Attorney's Office in Boston related to sales of Intron A and Rebetron, two
hepatitis C medicines, and Temodar, an oral chemotherapy agent for brain tumors.
David Schwab can be reached at dschwab@starledger.com or (973) 392-5835.
Copyright 2003 The Star-Ledger. Used by NJ.com with permission.
DISCLAIMER: All
information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for
general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the
knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended
as providing medical or legal advice. The decision whether or not to vaccinate
is an important and complex issue and should be made by you, and you alone, in
consultation with your health care provider.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"