Bush Signals He Thinks Possibility of Smallpox Attack Is Rising
By WILLIAM J. BROAD
or
months, Bush administration officials have talked about the threat of a smallpox
attack but have offered no strong proof. But by asking millions of Americans to
accept the risks of smallpox vaccinations, President Bush has signaled that he
thinks the possibility of an attack is rising as the United States considers a
war against Iraq and assesses long-term dangers.
Advertisement
Even if Saddam Hussein is removed in Iraq, federal officials said yesterday,
the specter of a smallpox attack will not disappear.
The announcement of the nation's first smallpox vaccination campaign in three
decades is part of a long-term strategy to protect the country from a contagious
virus that killed one in three unvaccinated people.
The administration's decision to offer 10.5 million health care workers and
other Americans a vaccine against a conquered disease says more about the
perceived risk of a smallpox attack than volumes of official statements and
Congressional testimony, or even Mr. Bush's assurances yesterday that the United
States faces no imminent threat.
It means officials are willing to accept the potential public backlash from
complications of the vaccine.
"We live in a new world," said Jerome M. Hauer, assistant secretary for
emergency preparedness at the Department of Health and Human Services.
In an interview, Mr. Hauer said Mr. Bush's decision was rooted in a calculus
that looked at the smallpox threat over the long term not just weeks or months
but years and decades.
The risks accumulate over a long time, Mr. Hauer said, and that drives
officials to take prudent steps now to prepare for the worst. Medical experts
estimate that the vaccine could give vaccinated individuals some protection
against the disease for decades.
By vaccinating millions of Americans, Mr. Hauer said, "you're testing your
logistics, developing trained cadres, and protecting medical response teams. So
in the event of an incident, you don't have to be concerned about vaccinating
those groups." He added that vaccination could then begin of people who had come
in contact with infected people "and, if necessary, mass vaccination."
Yesterday, Mr. Bush seemed to bend over backward not to create a panic, to
understate the threat, never once mentioning potential war with Iraq. His
strongest statement on the danger was that "regimes hostile to the United States
may posses this dangerous virus."
Dr. Alan P. Zelicoff, a physician and smallpox expert at the Sandia National
Laboratories, said in an interview that the administration was engaged in no
bluff or bluster, but had carefully weighed the long-term risks of a smallpox
attack.
"I think the administration has got it just about exactly right," he said of
offering the vaccine to 10 million people. "The question is not what is the risk
of attack in the next six months or year, but what is the risk over the
effective lifetime of the vaccine, which is measured in decades."
Intelligence agencies believe that Iraq may have collected the smallpox virus
from a natural outbreak that struck there in 1971 and 1972. Based on interviews
with defectors and other informants, the agencies also believe that North Korea
has the virus and that Russian scientists, impoverished by the collapse of the
Soviet Union, may have sold the virus to terrorists.
Experts on risk assessment say a short-term danger grows as time passes. For
example, a coin flipped has only a 50-50 chance of coming up heads, but flipped
many times will eventually land heads up.
In the case of smallpox, experts also fear that over time, the chance grows
that the virus and the knowledge and technology needed make it into a weapon
will spread.
The administration's move to protect the nation against such threats comes at
a potentially high cost.
Ten million Americans involved in health care, law enforcement, and emergency
response are to be offered the vaccine on a voluntary basis by this summer.
State and local officials say it will be a huge logistical challenge.
Ten million civilians is 20 times the roughly half million health workers
slated for the first, even quicker round of vaccinations. The larger number is
likely to produce health repercussions too big for Washington to ignore even if,
as expected, only half the target population ends up volunteering for the
vaccine. Based on previous statistics, five million immunizations could
translate into five deaths and 500 serious illnesses.
Advertisement
Those casualties might not occur. Though doctors have no recent experience
with smallpox, it is possible that modern drugs and treatments could save more
lives than in past epidemics.
But many infectious disease experts say that, if anything, the risk estimates
could be understated. Since routine smallpox vaccination ended in the United
States in 1972, millions of Americans have contracted illnesses that in theory
make them more susceptible to complications. People at risk include those whose
immune systems have been weakened by cancer or AIDS.
The smallpox push is reminiscent of an earlier vaccination episode that
involved the anthrax vaccine. Again, it occurred in reaction to Saddam Hussein.
In December 1997, six years after the Persian Gulf War, the Pentagon
announced that it had decided to vaccinate its 2.4 million solders and
reservists against anthrax. It was unclear what prompted the decision. Iraq's
program to make biological weapons had been exposed more than two years earlier,
and Clinton Administration officials offered no public assessment of what new
dangers existed, if any.
In time, the anthrax program turned into a public-relations disaster, with
hundreds of soldiers refusing to take the shots and some even suing the
government. One fear, discounted by federal officials, was that the vaccine can
cause serious side effects, as medical experts agree that the smallpox vaccine
did in the past and can do again today.
Things may be different for the Bush administration's smallpox push. Dr.
Zelicoff said he expected a public-education campaign by federal officials over
the next few months to more clearly articulate the issues posed by what medical
experts call history's worst killer.
"You have to understand the long-term benefits, which are enormous," Dr.
Zelicoff said. "Thinkers in the administration are planning to make that
argument publicly, and I believe the public will accept it once they see that
the initial cadre of vaccinated people does all right."
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"