The purpose of this volume is to provide a working reference of various
statements regarding vaccination and not to offer a "cure" of any specific
disease in any specific individual.
Preconceived opinions regarding vaccination will not be changed overnight nor
by the reading of a single book. Herein are the opinions of many great
scientists and doctors (of many schools). Many have spent a life-time of
researchof trial and error before making their statements. The reader has the
privilege to accept or to reject the statements after due deliberation.
Thus we feel this volume should not be considered a dangerous book for
the layman but a thought-provoking treatise.
For the past 2000 years physicians have been looking in the wrong direction
for the cure of disease. Their worse than useless practice of killing germs with
poison drugs has never and can never solve the problem of disease.
During the Dark Ages, before the introduction of improved nutrition and
sanitation, the world was intermittently visited with epidemics of smallpox. The
cause was stubbornly ignored and the seeds for more disease were sown when
vaccination was brought into popular use. This infusion of poison injected into
the blood stream of the masses only served to intensify the disease in some
cases, suppress the symptoms in others and create new and more serious diseases
in still others. So, with the passing of years we have seen this misbegotten
ignorance grow into a Frankenstein monster of immense proportions that moves
relentlessly forward, grinding under foot the multitudes that throng its path.
Through the lethal power of this poisoned needle, the simple zymotic
(contagious) diseases of the past have been devolved into the horrors of
the present our terrifying and expanding crop of "killer diseases". Many of
these strange "mystery diseases" that baffle the entire medical world, are the
sordid products of vaccine poisons that disturb the chemical balance of the body
and interfere with normal functioning.
All these medically-made atrocities are far worse than smallpox or any of the
other eruptive diseases that nature provides as a means of expelling the
accumulated poison waste from the abused body. This interference with the
balanced economy of nature has multiplied the problems beyond the power of
science to control.
Our worst epidemics now are epidemics of vaccination in which
more people are killed every year by "vaccinal diseases" than by the diseases
that the vaccinations were supposed to combat.
Complete freedom from disease can scarcely be found except in remote islands
or isolated communities that have not been invaded by medical mischief and
commercialized products. Is our proud civilization to be degraded, corrupted,
and destroyed by its own inventions designed for selfish profit and exploitation
of the race?
Vaccination, instead of being the promised blessing to the world, has proved
to be a curse of such sweeping devastation that it has caused more death and
disease than war, pestilence, and plague combined. There is no scourge (with the
possible exception of atomic radiation) that is more destructive to our nations
health than this monument of human deception this slayer of the innocent this
crippler of body and brain THE POISONED NEEDLE.
"Truth wears no mask, seeks neither place nor applause, bows to no
human shrine; she only asks a hearing."
The increasing flood of evidence against vaccination and the growing for the
un-suppressed facts about this "touchy" subject have literally forced this book
As this work has progressed and the extensive research has been carried to
trace down and organize the material for this manuscript, other valuable long
concealed records, that I had not expected, have come into my hands as if by
some unseen power. It is to be hoped that the information contained within these
pages will help to sweep away the tragic errors that cloud the minds of the
people as well as the physicians. It is urgent that the living words of TRUTH or
some other force be applied to abolish that deadly weapon, THE POISONED NEEDLE,
which has been the menacing road block standing m the way of progress in the
healing field for these many years
Vaccination and the false germ theory upon which it is hinged has led mankind
far astray and has severed the fragile thread that offered medical theory and
practice a hope of becoming a science. Under the sway of our present
degenerative medical methods the health of our people has declined to the lowest
point in history. The 1955 survey showed that over 90% of our population is
below par mentally or physically. According to life insurance records, army
reports, hospital statements, government statistics and physical examinations
for marriage certificates and employment, etc., it is revealed that there is
hardly one normal, healthy person in a hundred. The Cancer Foundation states
that one out of every four is marked for cancer. The figures on heart trouble
are even worse than that and the other "killer diseases" come in for their toll.
Practically all the rest of the people have symptoms of less serious diseases;
these symptoms being headaches. constipation, weak eves, dental caries, colds,
pain, stomach trouble, etc. Most, if not all, diseases are avoidable and curable
(at a certain stage) but not under the deceptive medical method of poisoning the
well and the sick with vaccines and drugs and mutilating them with unnecessary
When socialized medicine was threatening, a meeting of medical officials was
called to discuss just how many and which operations would really be
necessary if there was no profit in it. It was decided that only 3% would
be considered essential under those conditions. This information came from a
medical student whose instructor had attended the meeting.
After a glance at the medical records covering the past 70 years of what
boastfully called "our great strides of medical science" we can hardly
help wondering if those seven league strides havent been in reverse, because
there a marked decline in our nations health and a shocking increase in the
killer diseases during those very years. The acute diseases that were to have
been conquered by vaccination have only been masked and "save face" or
suppressed until the retained poisons corroded the internal organs and developed
into dangerous chronic diseases.
The following table gives us an idea of what our present faulty methods are
doing to our race:
INCREASE IN KILLER DISEASES DURING THE PAST 70 YEARS....
Insanity increased 400%
Cancer increased 308%
Anemia increased 300%
Epilepsy increased 397%
Brights Disease increased 65%
Heart Disease increased 179%
Diabetes increased 1800% (In spite of or because of insulin)
Polio increased 680%
Never in the history of this country have preventable diseases flourished with
such wild abandon, continuously being fed by the very drugs and commercialized
irritants that set them into operation in the first place.
Dr. Alexis Carrel, of the Rockefeller Institute, stated: (Scientific
Monthly, July, 1925):
"Although the adult individual today has much less chance of dying from
smallpox, cholera, or typhoid, than he had 50 years ago, he surely has more
prospect of being tortured by some form of cancer, afflicted with slow diseases
of the kidneys, of the circulatory apparatus or the endocrine glands, and of
going insane . . . Modern medicine protects him (attempts to) against infections
which kill rapidly, but leaves him exposed to the slower and more cruel
Annie Riley Hale, in "The Medical Voodoo" speaks of "medicine as a
system of healing which after 5000 years of trial and error is describing
itself as a science in the making, whose proudest showing to date is, that it
has enabled the race to swap smallpox for cancer and typhoid fever for
diabetes and insanity, may still be worthy of credence and patronage by its
devoted followers. But what justification can there be for putting the whole
power of the government back of such a system, and the public treasury at its
disposal, to spread misleading propaganda about its own peculiar doctrines and
methods, to force them on the helpless?"
Although there are a number of far more successful and efficient systems of
healing in this country, the medical system is the only one that gets
endorsement and support from the government. All our tax supported Departments
of Health, hospitals and institutions are under the domination of medical
personnel. In spite of the financial support, public confidence and full scale
experimentation and testing of all their methods and theories, the medical
school of healing has utterly failed to control any of the killer diseases and
doesnt have a sure cure for even one of the mild diseases. Smallpox and other
epidemics were largely controlled by improvements in sanitation and nutrition
years before vaccination became popularized. Yet a tremendous sum of money is
poured into the medical coffers every year with no accounting made for its use
and no benefits received. Isnt it time that this squandering of public funds be
stopped and the better qualified practitioners be given a chance to salvage the
wreckage before it is too late?
After half a century of medical practice, Dr. John Tilden made the
following observation, regarding inadequate medical procedures:
"Ability to cure has not kept pace with diagraosis, and today we behold the
scientific paradox of skilled physicians sometimes knowing exactly what disease
the patient is suffering with, but unable to cure the disease. . . Ability to
diagnose, but impotence in curing, is the true status of scientific medicine.
"Clinicians are floundering about in a sea of speculation and uncertainty
concerning cause and cure; and the best of them declare that autopsies prove
that almost half of their diagnoses are wrong." (Dr. Charles Mayo, in a
radio broadcast stated that at their clinic, autopsies show that they get only
20% diagnoses right.)
"Every part of the body is represented by a specialist. The irony of all this
professional perfection (?) is summed up in a few words, namely, diagnosis is an
elaborate system of summing up effects without a scintilla of knowledge of
cause, and treatment is a stupendous scheme of palliation, with braggadocio
concerning immunization. But the question will not down: How is a disease to be
prevented or cured when the cause is unknown? All 400 or more so called diseases
are nothing more than expressions of our general systematic derangementstates
which I am pleased to name toxemia, or healing crises. Toxemia is a state of
body poisoning self generated or induced by vaccine serums, drugs or other
poisons." ("Philosophy of Health," by Tilden)
R. T. Trall, M.D., was another doctor who gave the medical method a long
and thorough trial before abandoning it as a failure. He turned to nature and
its simplicity and upon its sound basic laws of healing he brought about
miracles of recovery from all diseases. After trying to justify the
inconsistencies of medical theory he had this to say:
"Why has not success in treating disease kept pace with the extraordinary
progress of knowledge of other sciences? The answer is ready: A successful
practice of the healing art must be based upon the laws of life, the economy of
vitality. The only foundation, therefore, of true healing is correct
physiological principles; and here is precisely where the whole orthodox medical
system of the present day fails utterly and totally fails. It has no
physiological and biological science upon which to truly practice the healing
These are strong words coming from medical doctors who know the system
thoroughly. Medicine is a paying game financially speaking and for
successful practitioners to leave it for the sake of honesty, integrity, and
idealism. indicates that these cherished qualities are lacking in that branch of
It is this lack of correct physiological and biological principles that has
enabled the medical profession to foist such an unscientific delusion as
vaccination on the public.
The false "germ theory" of disease, upon which vaccination is based, has been
the "blind leader of the blind" that has dragged the medical system and the
Impressionable public deeper into the morass of confusion and disease. (The germ
theory is discussed at length in the chapter titled ON FRIENDLY TERMS WITH GERMS
in Book II.) However, our present concern, in this chapter, is
merely to point out the instability of the nebulous theory of "anti-bodies"
which is the main prop that holds up the dead corpse of vaccination. In volume 6
of THE HYGIENIC SYSTEM, Dr. Herbert M. Shelton brings into
sharper focus this "tricky" subject of anti-bodies. These
elusive little nothings have fooled the people and served the uses of the
doctors but have vanished into theory when subjected to the clear light of
Dr. Shelton writes: "The whole of the modern medical practice of vaccine,
serum and antitoxin therapy is based upon the supposition that
the body manufactures substances called anti-toxins, anti-bodies, antigens,
etc., which are capable of meeting and destroying toxins that get into the body.
The idea seems to be sound, although it is possible that the
work of destroying such toxins is that of the detoxification carried on by the
liver, and lymph glands, etc. Anti-toxins, antibodies, antigens, etc., have
never been isolated. They have only been assumed, while the
practice based upon their assumed existence has been both a failure and
disaster. However, this may not be due to their non-existence. If they exist it
is impossible to separate them from the proteins of the animals blood (in
making vaccines) and these proteins when injected directly into the blood of
another animal (or human being) are very poisonous. Besides this, there is no
evidence that the anti-toxins of one species can be made use of by another
species. Where vaccines are employed, it constitutes the introduction of actual
disease matter into the blood. That is, the supposed causitive germs or some
product of the disease is introduced into the body. The consequences are often
terrible. Real benefits are never observed.
"If the hypothesis that the body manufactures anti-toxins, anti-bodies, etc.,
is correct it still remains to be proven that the body ever manufactures these
greatly in excess of the need for them. It cannot be shown that free
anti-toxin, anti-bodies, etc., are suspended in the blood serum and can
therefore be transferred to another animal in sufficient quantities to be of use
to the receiving animal. In keeping with a general law of life, it is very
probable that the body does manufacture an excess of anti-bodies, but it cannot
be shown that it retains these after the need for them has ceased. On the
contrary, in keeping with another general law of life, it is very probable that
the body begins to get rid of them the very instant the need for them ceases. If
they exist they are chemical substances produced to meet an emergency and will
be cast out as soon as the emergency ceases to exist."
The renowned Dr. Antoine Bechamp, one of the worlds foremost
scientists and bacteriologists, observed that the micro-organisms that are
ordinarily called germs, evolve out of decaying cells they helped to build, and
take part in the decomposing of the ever changing life substance and help to
form it into material usable again by nature. Thus, when germs are found within
a sick body it is not that they entered from outside and caused the disease. It
is because they developed from the decaying cells within the body and have an
important part to play in helping to handle the waste and destruction brought
about by serums, drugs and other poisons forced upon the body from without.
Perhaps our modern bacteriologists have seen this activity of the "microzymas"
and jumped to the conclusion that they are anti-bodies fighting disease and that
they (the doctors) must inject more oL them into the body by way of vaccines.
But anyone with common sense and reasoning can see that this would only
interfere and disrupt the well organized efforts of nature. This is the reason
why vaccination has taken such a heavy toll of lives and has produced such
"Nature makes no mistakes and violates no laws. She is uniformly governed by
fixed principles and all her actions harmonize with the laws that govern these
actions." (THE HYGIENIC SYSTEM, p. 48 Shelton )
"The best, indeed the only, method of promoting individual and public health
is to teach people the laws of nature and thus teach them how to preserve their
health. Immunization programs are futile and are based on the delusions that the
law of cause and effect can be annulled. Vaccines and serums are employed as
substitutes for right living; they are intended to supplant obedience to the
laws of life. Such programs are slaps in the face of law and order. Belief in
immunization is a form of delusional insanity." (PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL HEALING
p. 478 Shelton)
Dr. J. W. Hodge had considerable experience with vaccination before he
denounced it and wrote a book on his collected data. In his book THE VACCINATION
SUPERSTITION (p. 41) he states:
"After a thorough investigation of the most authentic records and facts in
harmony with the physicians daily observations and experiences, the conclusion
is drawn that instead of protecting its subjects from contagion of smallpox,
vaccination actually renders them more susceptible to it. Vaccination is the
implantation of disease that is its admitted purpose. Health is the
ideal state to be sought, not disease . . . Every pathogenic disturbance in the
infected organism wastes and lowers the vital powers, and thus diminishes its
natural resisting capacity.
"This fact is well known and so universally conceded that it seems
superfluous to cite authorities. Nevertheless, I shall mention one. The
International Textbook of Surgery. Vol. 1. p. 263, is authority for the
"Persons weakened by disease or worn out by excessive labor yield more
readily to infection that healthy individuals.
"If this is true, it explains why, in various epidemics, smallpox always
attacks the vaccinated first, and why these diseases continue to infest the
civilized world while its allied (unvaccinated) filth diseases have
disappeared before the advance of civilization, through the good offices of
sanitation, hygiene and improved nutrition."
"After a careful consideration of the history of vaccination gleaned from an
impartial and comprehensive study of vital statistics, and pertinent data from
every reliable source and after an experience derived from having vaccinated
3,000 subjects, I am firmly convinced that vaccination cannot be shown to have
any logical relation to the diminution of cases of smallpox, and
"1 That the practice of vaccination has been the means of disseminating
some of the most fatal and loathsome diseases, such as leprosy, syphilis,
tetanus and tuberculosis;
2 That vaccination is not only useless, but positively injurious,
of protecting its subjects from contagion of smallpox, it actually renders them
more susceptible to it by depressing the vital power and diminishing natural
3 That immunity from all diseases is to be realized through the attainment of
health, not by the propagation of disease;
"4 That it is never necessary to set up one disease in a healthy organism to
protect against another; that such procedure is an appalling violation of the
basic principles of hygiene and sanitary science;
5 That the performance of the vaccine operation in the very nature of the
case, violates the cardinal precepts of modern aseptic surgery, the aim of which
is to exclude the products of disease from the organism, and never to introduce
6 That there is no evidence worthy of the name, on record, to prove that
vaccination either prevents or mitigates smallpox;
7 That many healthy children have died from the effects of vaccination;
8 That millions of vaccinated people have died of confluent smallpox while
having the plainest vaccine scars on their bodies;
9 That smallpox epidemics invariably attack the vaccinated first;
10 That smallpox follows closely upon flagrant violation of the laws of
health, hygiene and sanitation;
11 That the occurrence of all the great epidemics of smallpox have coincided
with periods of sanitary neglect;
12 That cow-pox and venereal-pox have much in common;
13 That the analogy between the manifestations of vaccine and those of
syphilis is so close that several of the most eminent pathologists of the world
regard cow-pox as a modified form of syphilis;
"14 That the so called, spontaneous cow-pox is a myth; that cow-pox is a
disorder not natural to the cow; that it never occurs in bulls or steers, nor in
young heifers that have never been milked; that it is a disease of milk cows,
which has been communicated to them from sores on hands of milkers who were
suffering from syphilis;
"15 That the serious killer diseases such as cancer, syphilis, heart trouble,
polio, tuberculosis, etc., will never be eliminated as long as blood pollution
through vaccination is continued;
"16 That the community that has sanitary surroundings, a pure water supply,
wholesome food, good health and freedom from the blood-poisoning effects of
vaccination, need have no fear of smallpox or any other diseases;
"17 That no man can be truly said to be susceptible to the contagion of
smallpox or to that of any other disease so long as he is in a state of perfect
"18 That such a state resists and repels the assaults of all morbific
influences and is therefore the best protective against disease;
"19 That vaccination has utterly failed to fulfill the promises made for it by
Jenner and his followers and that he saddled a legacy of disease and death upon
the race for which he was paid $150,000 by the British government;
"20 That compulsory vaccination ranks with human slavery and religious
persecution, as one of the most flagrant outrages upon the rights of the human
"21 That Switzerland, England, Australia and other enlightened countries
abolished compulsory vaccination after it was tested and proved to be
disastrous; but laws sanctioning this crime still disgrace the statute books of
"22 That reforms are not made by those who profit by them so the doctors or
the government cannot be depended upon to abolish vaccination of their own
volition; that the people, themselves, must rise up and make demands for freedom
from this curse of greed, ignorance and destruction, for only then can we hope
to see the light of a new day of health, progress and harmonious adjustment.
CHAPTER II SMALLPOX DECLINED BEFORE VACCINATION WAS ENFORCED
"To mistake inferences or axioms for facts has
been a curse of science."Sir Clifford Albutt, in "Nature."
The simple fact that we have less smallpox now than we did 200 years ago,
does not in any degree prove that vaccination caused this decline, although the
promoters of vaccination have taken upon themselves the full credit for this
The most noticeable decrease in smallpox and other zymotic diseases began
with the sanitation reforms just prior to 1800 and the improvement in nutrition
brought about by such health crusaders as Trail, Graham and Jennings around
THIS SANITATION AND HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM included: (1) Sewage disposal,
(2) cleaning of streets, back yards, stables, etc., (3) improvement of roads so
that fresh vegetables, milk and other vital foods could be transported rapidly
to the cities and distributed while still fresh. (4) The water supply was
improved and protected from contamination. (5) Housing projects were built out
in the suburbs to relieve congestion of population in the cities.
THE NUTRITIONAL TEACHINGS stressed natural whole grain bread instead of white
bread, fresh fruits and vegetables free from salt, sugar, chemicals and other
harmful preservatives and the rejection of coffee, tea, alcohol, tobacco, drugs
and other drastic poisons. Meat and other low grade proteins were denounced in
favor of nuts, beans and other such proteins with more health value and less
The age-old "terror diseases" such as plague, black death, cholera, etc.,
that were previously believed to be contagious, responded at once to this health
program and soon declined to the vanishing point in countries that adopted the
sanitation and nutrition improvements. They are diseases of nutritional
deficiency and imbalance just the same as all other diseases.
A glance at the following table of official statistics from England and Wales
shows us how smallpox deaths declined only after the people began their
opposition to the vaccination law and an ever increasing number refused to be
Here we see that at the time when nearly all (96.5%) of the babies were
vaccinated, smallpox caused almost 4,000 deaths in that 10 year period; but,
when the vaccinations were resisted until only 39% would submit to it, the
death-rate dropped down to only 1.4 cases.
Before the passage of Englands compulsory vaccination law in 1853, the
highest authentic smallpox death-rate was only 2,000 for any two year period,
even during their most serious smallpox epidemics; whereas, after almost 20
years of compulsory vaccination there occurred the most devastating scourge of
smallpox in 1870 to 1871 that the world has ever known. It took 23,062 lives in
England and Wales and spread over Europe in all the countries where vaccination
and inoculation had been practiced on a large scale. After that the vaccination
laws were enforced even more rigidly until the people began to notice that
smallpox was not decreasing by this practice but continued to ravage the homes
of the vaccinated. During the same epidemic in Germany 124,948 people died of
smallpox. All had been vaccinated (according to their carefully kept records.)
"In Berlin alone no less that 17,038 persons had smallpox after vaccination, and
2,884 of them died."
In Sheffield, England where 97 per cent of her 200,000 inhabitants had been
thoroughly and frequently vaccinated for many years a smallpox epidemic swept
the city in 1887 that caused 7,101 cases and 648 deaths.
Preceding this, the large manufacturing town of Leicester, (England) which
had been even more thoroughly vaccinated up to the time of the 1870 epidemic was
the hardest hit of all the communities with over 3,500 deaths per million in the
first year of the epidemic. This completely destroyed their faith in vaccination
and the rich and poor alike rejected it and adopted sanitation with the result
that smallpox epidemics were soon eliminated from that city.
Sir Thomas Chambers, Q.C.M.P., recorder of the city of London said:
"I find that of the 155 persons admitted to the Smallpox Hospital in the
Parish of St. James, Piccadilly, 145 had been vaccinated."
In Marylevore Hospital 92 per cent of the smallpox cases had been vaccinated.
Marsons report of Highgate Hospital for 1871 states that, "of the 950 cases
of smallpox, 870 (90%) of the whole number of patients had been vaccinated."
At Hempstead Hospital, up to May 13, 1884, out of 2,965 admissions for
smallpox, 2,347 had been vaccinated.
After these vaccination epidemics, more and more people refused to comply
with the unjust vaccination laws and as a result of this and the improvements in
sanitation and nutrition, smallpox took a drop and continued to decline until it
is rarely seen at the present time.
"In 1942 one case of smallpox at Seindon (Britain) resulted in the
vaccination of a large number of people. Only three cases of smallpox occurred
and these all recovered, but 12 vaccinated individuals died from inflammation of
the brain. (This is a common after effect of vaccination.) In the same year near
Edinburg, Scotland, eight people died of smallpox (six of which had been
vaccinated) while ten died from the effects of the vaccination.
"I would not go so far as to say that vaccination has never saved a person
from smallpox. It is a matter of record that thousands of the victims of this
superstitious rite have been saved from smallpox by the immunizing potency
of death. But it is a fact that the official statistics of England and
Wales show unmistakably that, while vaccination has killed ten times more people
than smallpox, there has been a decrease in smallpox concomitant with the
decrease in vaccination. . . It might be appropriately asked, in the words of
the Vaccination Inquirer (London, Feb. 1947) How could an operation that
was declining be responsible for the extermination of smallpox?" (Vaccine
and Serum Evils, p. 23, by Dr. H. M. Shelton)
Records in all countries show that the so-called, contagious
diseases declined quite rapidly with the introduction of sanitation and
nutrition reforms, with the exception of smallpox and
diphtheria which were kept active by vaccination in a large number of
authenticated cases. The following condensed records from various countries give
a cross section of the available evidence that bears out this point.
In 1929 while India was still under British rule with its compulsory
vaccination laws, the League of Nations Health League referred to India
as, "the greatest center of smallpox in the world today." The records show that
in the large cities where vaccination enforcement was most rigid "the smallpox
death rate has been generally far greater than for the country as a whole" where
complete enforcement is not possible.
The report of the League of Nations Health Division for
Oct. 1953 reluctantly admits vaccination is not all it ought to be when it says
in part: "In spite of the great efforts made by the health authorities in
promoting vaccination, smallpox is not on the point of extinction."
After the limited health improvement programs we find that the plagues and
scourges, all declined noticeably except smallpox and respiratory diseases
(tuberculosis) which is a common after effect of vaccination.
AVERAGE DEATH-RATE FROM FEVERS AND OTHER CAUSES
per 1,000 of the population:
Fevers (Malaria. etc.
Dysentery - diarrhea
Respiratory diseases (T.B.)
Edward Jenner had promised that vaccination would wipe out instead, all other
diseases, even the most persistent and deadly more rapidly without any serums
than did smallpox with its repeated vaccinations.
Around 1900, after the improvements in health due to sanitation and nutrition
had had time to be weighed against that of vaccination, most of the people of
England began to refuse vaccination, which resulted in a greater decline in
smallpox, but in certain cities of India the British government was still able
to keep up rigid enforcement. The following chart shows the high smallpox
death-rate in three of these Indian cities as compared to the decreased
death-rate in London after the clean up (health) campaign:
AVERAGE ANNUAL SMALLPOX DEATH RATE PER MILLION PEOPLE
Although India was reported by the League of Nations as the greatest center
of smallpox in the world in 1929 it has improved since gaining its freedom from
Britain and relaxing its vaccination enforcement program. This leaves the over
vaccinated country of Mexico holding the dubious honor as the worlds worst
The following chart shows the comparison between Mexico with its sparse
population of 16,500,000 (1930 figures approx.) and British India with
its dense, congested population (300,000,000 approx.) In spite of the
disease breeding conditions of Indias cities with inadequate sanitation,
nutrition and housing facilities and the polluted water, lack of sewers, extreme
heat, etc., the smallpox death rate is far lower than that of completely
This black record could exist only in a country where vaccination laws are
rigidly enforced. The Mexican law prescribes:
"(1) Children must be vaccinated within four months of birth.
(2) One compulsory vaccination and one compulsory re-vaccination for all
inhabitants, within the time limits and in the manner and under the conditions
specified by the Public Health Council.
(3) All persons are obliged to have themselves re-vaccinated at least once every
five years, and may be required to do so more frequently whenever the health
authorities so determine.
(4) The Army Medical Service vaccinates all soldiers. Employees in commercial,
industrial, etc., establishments must have all persons in their employ
vaccinated within the time-limits laid down."
In spite of the constant recurrence of smallpox epidemics cultivated by
vaccination, this medical dictatorship continues to rule with an iron hand. If
the Mexicans were not a hardy people by nature they would have been destroyed by
this time reduced to imbecility, by this continuous blood poisoning practice.
In Jenners day, smallpox was practically unknown in Mexico for which he
promptly claimed the credit. In 1811 Jenner wrote to Dr. Lettson as follows:
"For the great and grand effects of vaccination the eye must quit this little
spot (England) and survey it among other European countries and still more
particularly among the vast empires of Asia and America. In Mexico and Peru the
disease is nearly extinct.
Jenner didnt wait around to see the results of his terrible invention. Even
he admits that smallpox was almost unknown when he started his work of
destruction. Today, vaccination has so intensified the development of smallpox
that all vaccinated Mexicans have either had it or are in danger of getting it.
Mexico has had the good sense to abolish the barbarous practice of capital
punishment and the cruel and useless practice of vivisection which puts that
country a step ahead of United States in that respect. It is to be hoped that
those people who fought so hard for freedom and democracy will also be able to
throw off the heavy yoke of medical oppression.
Dr. Charles Ruta, professor of Materia Medica at Parugia University, Italy,
presents some interesting figures comparing the smallpox deaths of the
vaccinated soldiers with the women and boys outside the armed services.
Vaccination is stressed in that country (which accounts for the high smallpox
rate among all ages) but more thoroughly enforced in the Army. The boys are
inducted at the age of 20 years. The figures show the death-rate from smallpox
is about twice as high among men over 20 (soldiers) as among women of the same
SMALLPOX DEATH-RATE OF THOROUGHLY VACCINATED ITALIAN SOLDIERS COMPARED WITH
THE LESS VACCINATED WOMEN AND BOYS
Entire Population Under 20 Years
20-30 Years (Military Age)
Dr. Ruta traced the records for many years following this published record
and the results continued with the same high death-rate among the completely
vaccinated soldiers and with the lower death-rate among the rest of the
Although England was the first country to adopt compulsory vaccination laws
her people soon found it was a disastrous practice and fought to have the law
abolished. About the time of the First World War the English people had
succeeded enough in resisting the law to notice a considerable decrease in
small-pox, aided of course by the sanitation program. Germany and Italy were
still trying to enforce vaccination on the entire population. The following
chart shows a comparison of the smallpox deaths of the three countries:
The League of Nations Monthly Health report for October 15, 1929, gives a
report on Egypt with an effort toward justifying the re-occurring smallpox
epidemics in spite of the compulsory vaccination laws. However, the "whitewash"
doesnt cover the inefficacy of this useless practice. The report states:
"In Egypt, vaccination is compulsory under the Decree of 1890. . . Penalties
are provided for infringements . . . It has not been found possible as yet to
enforce vaccination everywhere, and smallpox continues to claim a fair number of
victims every year. The last great epidemic broke out in 1919 and extended into
1920. More than five and a half million persons were vaccinated during these two
years, and this completely arrested the spread of the epidemic. In 1921, the
number of cases had gone down to 92 as compared with 7,895 in 1919 and 3,004 in
The epidemic wore itself out in two years and the vaccinators claimed that it
was the serum that arrested it. If vaccination could arrest an
epidemic at all, it should - certainly do it in less than two years. If there
had been no vaccination at all there would have been a much lower smallpox rate
as is proved by world records where the facts are not falsified.
The fact that there was less smallpox the following year was no proof that
vaccination curbed it. Isnt it quite logical that all those who were in a
condition to develop it did so during the long two year epidemic, so there would
not be many to contract it the following year?
The following report put out by the League of Nations Health (?) department
is a typical example of how the medical schemers influence the average,
unthinking person with data that appears to be true and
"NORTHERN AFRICA As vaccination progresses, the most remarkable success is
being achieved in Egypt which in 1926 had 2,677 cases with 544 deaths. But in
1930 it (smallpox) caused only 14 cases without deaths. . . This is undoubtedly
due to the vaccination campaign begun at the end of 1925 and completed in 1926.
Approximately 14,600,000 vaccinations were performed, thus reaching practically
the whole population."
Here we have a number of statements that are hard to reconcile with known
facts. For instance: (1) In June 1925, the population of Egypt was estimated to
be 13,964,900 yet the report said they gave 14,660,000 vaccinations. Since there
are more vaccinations reported than people, either the figures are fabricated or
the vaccinators didnt really believe in vaccination and knew it would not
protect for even one year so they re-vaccinated thousands of people with the
vain hope that the repetition of failure would in some way reap success.
(2) In the first report they blamed the frequent outbreaks of smallpox on the
claim that it was impossible to enforce vaccination on all the people. Yet their
figures in the second record showed the number of vaccinations exceeded the
(3) The first report stated that their widespread vaccination campaign in 1920
which reached 5,500,000 people had completely arrested smallpox and the
following report of 1931 made it clear that the complete and thorough
vaccination campaign succeeded in conquering smallpox, even to the point where
there were no deaths at all from that cause. This type of propaganda has a
tendency to lull the people into a sense of false security which leaves the real
cause of disease unchecked. Lets follow the record a little farther and see
The five and a half million vaccinations in 1920 were supposed to have
brought smallpox under control, yet in 1926 (only 6 years later) the second
report tells of a sweeping smallpox epidemic in which 2,677 were stricken and
In spite of the 5,500,000 vaccinations in 1920 and the 14,600,000 vaccination
in 1926 and all the vaccinations in the intervening years, including the
compulsory vaccinations of all infants, there occurred another larger and more
terrible smallpox epidemic in 1932 (only 6 years after the alleged complete
control of smallpox in Egypt). This sweeping epidemic continued for two years,
aggravated, of course, by the meddling vaccinators. By the end of 1934, 7,650
cases had been reported of which 1,373 had died. Where is the remarkable success
of vaccination boasted of by the medical faction of the League of Nations?
In their monthly Epidemiological Report (RE 132) dated Nov 15, 1929, this one
time great organization revealed its biased confusion on health matters by
It will therefore be plain that, if the conclusions are to be accepted, and
allowing for individual peculiarities, re-vaccination should be repeated, three
or four years at least, or even more often."
Joseph Swan comments on this in his book The Vaccination Problem page 288
by saying All these demands for frequent re-vaccination may be to an absurdity
by asking a simple question How is it that in England, abandonment of even
primary vaccination by approximately half the parents during the past 25 years,
and the almost entire neglect of re-vaccination at any age, have been
accompanied by the lowest smallpox mortality rate on record?"
Alter smallpox vaccination was found to be so financially profitable doctors
and serum manufacturers, serums for other diseases were invented and enforced
with the same financial increase but also with the same decrease in the
elimination of the disease. Diphtheria is one of the most notable examples of
The following table is one of the many records that show how the unvaccinated
diseases declined more rapidly than those that were supposed to be wiped out or
controlled by vaccines. (This report was compiled before serums were invented
for the other diseases shown.)
CHART SHOWING DECLINE OF DISEASE WITHOUT VACCINATION (England and Wales)
Death-rate per million children living. (Ages, between birth and 15 years.)
20 year periods
Here we see that measles decreased 94.1 per cent during this
period; scarlet fever decreased 99.7 per cent; whooping
cough decreased 91 per cent while diphtheria, the
disease that was supposed to be conquered by serum immunization decreased only
88.8 per cent which was the least of all. If left alone it would have declined
at the same rate as the others, or even faster because it was the least
It will be noted that in 1861 diphtheria was the least fatal of the
childrens diseases. But according to this report of the Ministry of Health, the
1948 record shows it to have increased to the second most deadly of the children
killers with its 105 deaths per million, while whooping cough was only slightly
higher with 121 deaths.
Another report issued by the British Ministry of Health gives the diphtheria
death-rate from among 4,000,000 children who were not
immunized. It gives a five year period (1945 to 1949) in which the diphtheria
death-rate declined from 551 cases in 1945 down to 63 in 1949. What caused this
phenomenal drop of 87 per cent in only five years when the record of
immunized children showed a decline of only 88 per cent in an 87 year
period of immunization? The credit cannot be claimed by the serum makers because
these children were not "protected" (?) by any vaccines.
The Ministry of Health attributed the rapid decline of the other diseases, to
improvements in sanitation, nutrition, housing, education and social conditions,
but diphtheria and smallpox were claimed to have declined because of
"prophylactics." If vaccination and immunization were preventives of smallpox
and diphtheria they should at least keep pace with the decline of other
Although France had rejected immunization after seeing the disasters that
followed its use she was pressured into submitting to it after German
occupation. By 1941 most of the French children had been inoculated after which
the diphtheria incidence rose to 13,795 by the end of that year. By 1943,
diphtheria had increased to 46,750.
At the beginning of the Second World War immunization was made compulsory in
Germany and the diphtheria rate soared up to 150,000 cases (1939) while in
unvaccinated Norway there were only 50 cases.
Space in this chapter does not permit the reviewing of the numerous records
that condemn immunization. More on this subject will be given in the chapter on
DIPHTHERIA AND IMMUNIZATION in Book II.
The over-all picture for United States has been toward a steady decline in
smallpox since the gradual abandonment of vaccination laws in the various
states. Only a few of the more backward states and some of the medically
dominated institutions and businesses still impose compulsory vaccination laws
on the people. In 1902 when vaccination was endorsed by the majority, the
death-rate from smallpox was 2,121. By 1910, vaccination disasters had caused it
to lose favor to such an extent that the smallpox death-rate dropped down to
202. The serum makers used the frenzy of the First World War to work up a nation
wide vaccination campaign that raised the smallpox death-rate up to 358 (1919)
and by 1921 it had increased to 642. When the people began to notice that the
vaccinated were the ones who suffered the worst from smallpox and flu (an after
effect of vaccination) they lost faith in it to a large extent and by 1927 the
deaths dropped down to 138 where it has been fluctuating every since.
In contrast to our diminished smallpox rate under optioned vaccination we
have an excellent example of compulsory vaccination in our (U.S.) dominated
Philippine Islands. In a 10 year period (1911-1920) 24,436,889 vaccinations were
given which resulted in 75,339 deaths. Before vaccination was introduced the
highest death-rate in the Philippines, even during epidemics was only 10 per
cent of the population. After many years of thorough vaccination and
re-vaccination the death-rate rose to 74 per cent which is the highest in
history. In United States (1919) when vaccination was indifferently accepted,
the death rate from smallpox was only 358, while in the Philippines (1919) under
strict vaccination enforcement the death-rate from this cause was 18,213. In
1920 in vaccinated Italy, the smallpox death-rate was 12,155 as compared to only
508 in United States during the same period.
In spite of these cold facts and thousands of others like them, the promoters
of vaccines insist that vaccination has been a blessing to the world and has
reduced disease. This all goes to prove the old saying that figures cant lie
but liars can figure.
INOCULATE THE DOCTORS
Inoculate for small-pox
Inoculate for mumps;
Inoculate for typhoid
For colds and nervous slumps;
Inoculate with cow pus
And germs of every brand
Inoculate with monkey glands
To make us young again.
But one fine day the laity
Will move in self-defence
To inoculate the doctors
With a little common sense.
by a medical student, Winnipeg, Canada
It often heppens that the universal belief of one age - a
belief which no one was, not without an extraordinary effort of genius and
courage could, at that time be free - becomes to a subsequent age se palpable an
absurdity that the only difficulty, then, is to imagine how such a thing can
ever have appeared credible.---John Stuart Mill.
From its inception down to the present time
vaccination has been denounced as dangerous, disease producing and even
deadly, by all thinking doctors who have investigated the facts
and have had the courage to voice them.
A few of these published statements from prominent doctors
are presented here:
From Dr. Alexander Wilder, Editor of the New
Yolk Medical Times, Professor of Pathology in the United States Medical College
of New York and author of WILDER'S HISTORY OF MEDICINE, we have this
"Vaccination is the infusion of contaminating element into
the system, and after such contamination you can never be sure of regaining the
former purity of the body. Consumption follows in the wake of vaccination as
certainly as effect follows cause."
Dr. Walter M. James of Philadelphia says:
"Vaccination does not stay the spread of smallpox nor even
modify it in those who get it after vaccination. It does introduce into the
system, and therefore contributes to the spread of, tuberculosis, cancer
and even leprosy. It tends to make more virulent epidemics of smallpox
and to make them more extensive. It does just what inoculation did - cause the
spread of disease."
Dr. Kalb, Royal Examiner of Statistics
for Bavaria, states:
"Examination shows vaccination a complete failure. In this
single year, 3,994 vaccinated people died of smallpox; the total number attacked
exceeded 29,000." (All were vaccinated.)
Dr. L Hall Bakewell, Vaccinator General of Trinidad
"I have very little faith in Vaccination even as modifying
the disease, and none at all as a protective in virulent epidemics. Personally,
I contracted smallpox less than six months after a most severe re-vaccination."
This doctor was in the vaccination business; his livelihood
depended on it and he wanted to believe in it. In Trinidad where vaccination was
compulsory he had ample opportunity to observe the full effects of it on a large
scale, yet he voluntarily denounced the practice as a failure.
Dr. L C. Carter of London reports:
"In looking over the history of vaccination for smallpox, I
am amazed to learn of the terrible deaths from vaccination, amputations of arms
and leg., foot and mouth disease, tetanus (1ockjaw), septicemia (bood
poisoning), cerebro-spinal meningitis."
Dr. J. C. Ward M.R.C.S. at Harrogate,
(England) among many others confesses to a change of heart on the vaccination
question in this statement:
"I believed that vaccination prevented smallpox. I believed
that if it did not absolutely prevent it in every case, it modified the disease
in some cases, and I believed that re-vaccination, if only frequent enough, gave
absolute immunity. Experience has driven all that out of my head; I have seen
vaccinated persons get smallpox, and persons who had been vaccinated get
smallpox, and I have seen those who had had smallpox get it a second time and
die of it."
Professor Adolf Vogt, who held the chair of
vital Statistics and Hygiene in Berne University for 17 years said:
"After collecting the particulars of 400,000 cases of small
pox I am compelled to admit that my belief in vaccination is absolutely
Dr. Charles E. Page of Boston said:
"I have been a regular practitioner of medicine in Boston for
33 years. I have studied the question of vaccination conscientiously for 45
years. As for vaccination as a preventative of disease, there is not a scrap of
evidence in its favor. Injection of virus into the pure bloodstream of the
people does not prevent Smallpox. Rather, it tends to increase its epidemics and
makes the disease more deadly. Of this we have indisputable proof. In our
country (U.S.) cancer mortality has increased from 9 per 100,000 to 80 per
100,000 or fully 900 per cent increase, within the past 50 years, and no
conceivable thing could have caused this but the universal blood poisoning now
Dr. Forbes Laurie says:
"I can add my testimony to the others . . . that
vaccination contributes to the great increase in cancer.
Hon. Percival P. Baxter, Governor of Maine
"Personally I have grave doubts as to the efficacy of modern
serums and vaccines and am convinced that commercialism has exercised a
considerable influence upon some phases of modem medicine."
Dr. William Howard Hay of Buffalo, New York said:
"We have no proof of the boasted effectiveness of any
form of anti-toxin, vaccine or serum. The true figures on vaccination
for smallpox have never gotten before the public, though they can be seen in the
files of the various departments of the Army as well as the government, if one
cares to look for them. If the record of vaccination in the Philippines alone
were ever to become a matter of general knowledge it would finish vaccination in
the whole country, at least among those who are able to read and think for
themselves. After three years of the most rigid vaccination, when every
Philippino had been vaccinated from one to six times, there occurred the
severest epidemic of smallpox that the Islands had ever seen, with a death-rate
running in places to over 70 per cent, and in all, well over 60,000 deaths. Is
it any wonder the public is getting a little suspicious of us and our vaunted 'medical
discoveries?' The wonder to me is that there are still millions of them
willing to submit to vaccination and serum treatment."
Alfred Russell Wallace D.D. who spent many years doing research all
over the world, collecting data on both sides of the vaccination question had
this to say:
"While utterly powerless for good, vaccination is a certain
cause of disease and death in many cases and is the probable cause of about
10,000 deaths annually in England, by five diseases of the most terrible and
L F. Cornell, M.D., President of the
Homeopathic Medical Society of New York said: (1868)
It is my firm conviction that vaccination has been a curse
instead of a blessing to the race. Every physician knows that cutaneous
(pertaining to the skin) diseases have increased in frequency, severity, and
variety to an alarming extent. To what is this increase owing? Contagion may
account for some of the varieties; in a large majority, however, to no medium of
transmission is the wide spread dissemination of this class of diseases so
largely indebted as to vaccination."
Dr. E. M. Ripley, of Unionville,
Connecticut, stated in a public address delivered in New Britain, Connecticut:
"Never in the history of medicine has there been produced so
false a theory, such fraudulent assumptions, such disastrous and damning results
as have followed the practice of vaccination; it is the ultima thule (extremity)
of learned quackery, and lacks, and has ever lacked, the faintest shadow of a
scientific basis. The fears of the people have been played upon as to the
dangers of smallpox and the sure prevention by vaccination, until nearly the
whole civilized world has become physically corrupted by its practice.
"The life-blood of nations has become the cesspool of
vaccinators wherein they have poured the foul excretions that are thrown off
from diseased beasts, nature adjudging it too vile to contaminate the system of
any living creature.
SCROFULA, that hydra-headed monster of
pathology, whose ramifications extend into and complicate nearly all the
diseases that flesh is heir to, and whose victims are as the sands of the
seashore in number, is one of the oldest children of vaccine poisoning.
"SYPHILIS, that disreputable disorder, that
sinks its victims below the scale of decency, and hounds them to dishonorable
graves, has been carried by the vaccinator's needle into the homes of the
innocent and virtuous, and there, with consequent suffering that defies the
imagination of man to depict."
Dr. J. Peebles (M.D.,Ph.D.) in his hook
"VACCINATION A MENACE TO PERSONAL LIBERTY" wrote:
"When a mad dog enters a community and bites a child, the
whole population rises up and demands the death of the creature, and desires
that all available means be immediately used to eliminate from the system of the
child the virus that has been so cruelly inserted. The action of the people in
this case is a very natural one; but let me tell you that where tile bite of a
mad dog has caused death in one case, the mad doctor with his calf-lymph and
poisoned needle has caused tens of thousands of deaths.
"Vaccination is the most outrageous insult that can be
offered to any pure-minded man or woman. It is the boldest and most impious
attempt to mar the works of God that has been attempted for ages. The stupid
blunder of doctor-craft has wrought all the evil that it ought, and it is time
that free American citizens arise in their might and blot out the whole
Dr. Thomas Morgan, in his "MEDICAL
DELUSIONS" (page 6) writes:
"At the present time, the medical profession prescribes
innumerable poisons, such as arsenic, strychnine, morphine, mercury and other
destructive drugs that ruin the health of the human race . . . and the greatest
of all delusions is the GERM THEORY, and the consequent introduction of serum
therapy, with its various antitoxins
"Notwithstanding the fact that these medical
delusions have been the cause of more injury and death than pestilence, famine
and war combined, the medical doctors have agreed to meet each other
half way, on the common ground of self-interest, for the purpose of formulating
and enforcing the tyrannical laws to prevent anyone outside their ring from
The following public confession was made by
J. W. HODGE M. D. of Niagara Falls, New York:
"To affirm that there never has been any scientific warranty
for a belief in the alleged protective virtues of vaccination and that its
practice is backed by ignorance and indifference, is a sorry charge to make
against the medical profession...but the charge, I regret to say is only too
true. I know whereof I affirm, for I, too, must plead guilty of the charge.
Before discovering my mistake I had vaccinated more than 3,000 victims,
ignorantly supposing the disease I was propagating to be a preventative of
smallpox. Having taken for granted what my teachers had asserted, I was a
staunch believer in the alleged efficacy of vaccination as a prophylactic
against smallpox. I remained in this blind and blissful state of ignorance for
several years, and not until I acquired a little experience in the school of
observation and reflection did I discover that my faith was pinned to a shameful
"The first real eye-opener I received upon the subject was
while I was practicing my profession in Lockport. At that time (1902) smallpox
made its appearance in this city and soon attained the proportions of an
epidemic. At the outbreak of the disease more vaccinations were ordered by the
Department of Health and I was officially appointed Public Vaccinator. My duty
was to go from house to house and vaccinate all persons who could not present
recent vaccination scars on their bodies, and to re-vaccinate all those who
could not give assurance of having been vaccinated within a period of two years.
"Just before and during the prevalence of this epidemic I
vaccinated nearly 3,000 victims, using the so-called "pure calf-lymph"
obtained every third day 'fresh' from the vaccine farm of the New York City
Board of Health. Much to the disgust of the people, and more my own surprise and
chagrin, I was confronted with a large number of cases of vaccinal
erysipelas, as well as several cases of phlegmonous axillary
abscesses following as results of vaccination. This is not all; a
number of those vaccinated were attacked with confluent smallpox at periods
varying from twelve days to three weeks, after having been rendered immune'
(?) by vaccination.
"These astounding facts, so contrary to my preconceived
notions about vaccination and smallpox, I could not account for and they
confused me as I was not able to see where the 'protection'
"With Pascal, I 'considered the
affirmation of facts more powerful than assertions of men'. I then
began a careful study of the relations existing between smallpox and
vaccination, with the ultimate result that I was forced to entirely abandon all
faith in the medical dogma of vaccinal protection against smallpox. During the
epidemic, I had under my inspection 28 smallpox patients, all of whom, with one
exception, had been 'successfully' vaccinated. Several of these
patients had been re-vaccinated before contracting the disease. THUS I WAS
FORCED, THROUGH THE STERN LOGIC OF DISAGREEABLE FACTS, TO THE UNWELCOME
CONCLUSION THAT VACCINATON HAD NOT PROTECTED THESE VICTIMS OF SMALLPOX.
"After the revelations of this dismal experience had dawned
upon me I determined to make a careful study of the printed data on vaccination.
After a thorough investigation of the statistics of smallpox epidemiology
collected ffrom various parts of the world, I was treated to another great
surprise, namely, the world's greatest statisticians on smallpox and vaccination
fully corroorated the experience that I had met with in the Lockport epidemic.
"Previous to this disappointing experience I had read only the usual
literature on the subject, found in libraries and medical schools. I had heard
only the "expert" (one-sided) testimony of the pro-vaccinists. I knew but one
side of the question and was like the one of whom John Stuart Mill spoke, when
'HE WHO KNOWS ONLY HIS OWN SIDE OF THE CASE KNOWS LITTLE OF THAT.'
"After a careful study of the history of vaccination and the extensive
experience in its use, I am thoroughly convinced that:
"(1) Vaccination is utterly useless as a preventive against smallpox, that
millions of vaccinated persons have died of smallpox.
"(2) The practice of this degrading rite is enforced by doctors as a dogma
without being understood; that like other infamous dogma it is good only for
"(3) Inoculation as unanimously believed in and practiced by the "regular"
doctors for 100 years was guilty of multiplying smallpox....
"( 4) Smallpox epidemics were checked by cessation of inoculation and not by the
introduction of vaccination.
"(5) Smallpox continued to increase under vaccination until sanitation and
improved nutrition came into more general use.
"(6) Health measures have controlled smallpox, and vaccination has claimed the
"(7) Vaccination protects from smallpox only when it kills the patient before
"(8) Vaccination has been the means of disseminating (spreading) consumption,
cancer, syphilis, and many other fatal and loathsome diseases.
"(9) Tuberculosis is a disease common to cattle and to human beings and has
frequently been conveyed by vaccination from the former to the latter, by way of
"(10) Edward Jenner shaddled a legacy of disease and death on the human race and
incidentally made $150,000 by the transaction.
"(11) Many doctors and some editors are making money by propagating this curse.
"(12) Vaccination is called 'successful' when it succeeds in making healthy
"(13) Disease as the result of vaccination is the logical harvest
from the seed sown.
"(14) Vaccination has no scientific basis upon which to rest
its claims and no analogy in any ascertained principle or law in nature.
"(15) The so called 'spontaneous cow-pox' (from which vaccine
is made) is a myth; the disease so named, being tubercular or
syphilitic in its nature.
"(16) When vaccination kills its victims the facts are suppressed and the death
certificates name other diseases as the cause.
"(17) Compulsory vaccination has been abolished in England, Switzerland, and
certain other countries, while laws sustaining this crime still disgrace the
statute books of many states in free (?) America.
"(18) Vaccination is one of the foulest blots on the escutcheon of the nobel
art of healing' ".
"A mere assumption of belief unsupported by demonstrable facts
is always open to criticism. It is easy to be carried away by the beauty of an
ideal or entranced by the overwhelming appeal of a pet delusion . . . . We hav,
had much to learn but even more to unearn. Many think they are thinking
constructively when they are merely rearranging their prejudices." George S.
It has been claimed, by an unenlightened few, that vaccination is based on
scientific principles and is of comparatively recent origin. But these claims
have been proved false, first, because inoculation was practiced and abandoned
as useless by primitive tribes many centuries ago, and second because Jenner and
the modern experimenters in vaccination were not scientists and did not test and
prove their theories by any scientific criteria before launching the hazarduous
practice on the public.
For many years Edward Jenner was acclaimed a hero for what
was thought to be his discovery of cow-pox vaccination. But this dubious honor
was later admitted to belong to Benjamin Jesty, whom all the
chroniclers name as the one responsible for the original
discovery of cow-pox inoculation. Jesty, a farmer, Plett, a
teacher and Jensen, a farmer, were named as successful experimenters" in the
field of cow-pox vaccination several years before Jenners first inoculation
These and all subsequent vaccination experiments were then, and still are,
haphazard and unscientific attempts at solving the problem of disease
Before we trace the ancient history of vaccination let us review some of the
outstanding authorities who recognized that:
Many of the worlds greatest thinkers, scientists, statesmen and even doctors
have condemned vaccination as being a crime against humanity, a fraud promoted
for private gain, an insult to the race and a blot upon the name of civilization
Yet, this treacherous practice of blood pollution, which was cradled in the lap
of. ignorant savage tribes, has been adopted by, supposedly, enlightened
government of the present day and forced on the protesting populationfor
M.M. Gernerd in his book "The Vaccination Imposture"
"Vaccination is not in any sense scientific; doctors never know what
the result will be in any case; they dont absolutely know that it ever
prevented smallpox; they never know when they have pure vaccine; the practice is
born of pure superstition; and it has been a breeder of many kindred fallacies."
Florence Nightingale, the worlds most famous nurse and an
authority on smallpox by right of extensive experience, said:
"Everyone who knows anything about public health questions will agree to the
practical unity of epidemics, and the determining causes, and that exemption
from. . . disease must be sought not by any one thing, such as vaccination, but
by inquiring into and removing the causes of epidemic susceptibility generally."
"The successive Vaccination Acts were passed by means of allegations which
were wholly untrue, and promises which have all been unfulfilled. They stand
alone in modern legislation as a gross interference with personal liberty and
the sanctity of the home; while as an attempt to cheat outraged nature, and to
avoid a symotic disease without getting rid of the foul conditions that produce
or propagate it, the practice of vaccination is utterly opposed to the
whole teaching of sanitary science, and is one of those terrible blunders which,
in their far-reaching evil consequences, are worse than the greatest of crimes."
Among our best authoritative sources of information are the actual government
records showing the
The report of Dr. William Farr, Compiler of Statistics of
the Registrar-General, London. states:
"Smallpox attained its maximum mortality after vaccination was
introduced ..The mean annual (smallpox) mortality to 10,000 population
from 1850 to 1869 was at the rate of (only) 2.04, whereas (after compulsory
vaccination) in 1871 the death rate was 10.24 and in 1872 the death rate was
8.33, and this after the most laudable efforts to extend vaccination by
Other authorities and numerous records and case histories showing the failure
of vaccination are given elsewhere in this book.
The truly great minds of the world recognize the balanced economy of nature
and know that when the chemistry of the body is thrown out of balance by faulty
nutrition and other causes, toxins accumulate and the entire physical organism
marshals its healing forces in an effort to meet the emergency and make
adjustment to the condition. This healing effort may be expressed in many ways,
such as accelerated circulation and fever, disturbed breathing,
intensified bowel elimination (diarrhea) and mucous
discharges to expel poisons, eruptions, swelling
of lymphatic glands such as the tonsils to handle the overload of toxic waste,
pain, indicating the presence of irritants,
etc. All this display of the vital energy at work to restore normalcy, is
interpreted by the average physician, as disease and something
to interfere with by giving poison drugs, vaccines and crippling operations. ,
Modern medical methods delay and frustrate the unexcelled healing efforts of
Dr. Oliver Wendell Holmes, one of the few enlightened
physicians expressed this point in one powerful sentence when he said:
"THE DISGRACE OF MEDICINE HAS BEEN THE COLOSSAL SYSTEM OF SELF-DECEPTION, IN
OBEDIENCE TO WHIH MINES HAVE BEEN EMPTIED OF THEIR CANKERING MINERALS, THE
ENTRAILS OF ANIMALS TAXED FOR THEIR IMPURITIES, THE POISON BAGS OF REPTILES
DRAINED OF THEIR VENOM, AND ALL THE INCONCEIVABLE ABOMINATIONS THUS OBTAINED,
THRUST DOWN THE THROATS OF HUMAN BEINGS SUFFERING (merely) FROM SOME WANT OF
ORGANIZATION, NOURISHMENT, OR VITAL STIMULATION."
When we read of primitive witch doctors experimenting with inoculation by
rubbing the pus from the diseased into scratches on the body of
the well, we look upon it with tolerance because they did not
have enough knowledge about physiology to understand that nature does not
produce health by contaminating the blood stream with filth. Although we are
willing to make excuses for the mental immaturity of those backward races, what
excuse can be make for our modern doctors who do the same thing on a larger
scale with a longer needle?
Vaccination has been a tragic failure because it is based on the false theory
that disease is a ruthless enemy that must be fought and killed by poison drugs
or outwitted by (supposedly) implanting anti-bodies from vaccines into the blood
stream. These mythical anti-bodies are said to make war on disease germs. But
germs are not the cause of disease in the first place and are useful wherever
they are found in nature, whether they are serving as scavengers working on the
decaying waste products, or whether they are helping with the decomposing and
renewing of cell structure that takes place continually, they are inseparably a
part of the great pattern of pulsating life. (For detailed, scientific
experiments proving the importance and nature of germs, bacteria, microbes,
etc., read the findings of Antoine Bechamp as recorded in the
remarkable book, BECHAMP OR PASTEUR, by
E. Douglas Hume English Pub. see
As has been stated before, disease is a cleansing effort of the body in its
attempt to rid itself of excess poisons, waste matter, obstructions, and
incompatible food. DISEASE IS NOT SOMETHING TO BE CURED; IT IS A CURE.
Germs do not attack from without; they develop within the cells themselves
when the need for them occurs. The whole framework of vaccination is based on
the misconception that germs cause disease and must be counteracted with
vaccines. But this procedure can bring no other result than harm.
"VACCINATION DOES NOT STAY THE SPREAD OF DISEASE OR EVEN MODIFY IT in those
cases who get it after vaccination. IT DOES INTRODUCE INTO THE SYSTEM
TUBERCULOSIS, CANCER, AND LEPROSY. It does just what inoculation did cause the
spread of disease."
Annie Riley Hale, (researcher for Congressmen) stated:
"The Surgeon-General of the United States Army innocently recorded in the
1918-1919 report that for all officers and enlisted men, Americans and native
troops in all countries where U.S. troops were serving, tuberculosis of
the lungs was the leading cause for discharge; and among American
troops at home and abroad there were 31,106 hospital admissions for pulmonary
tuberculosis with 1,114 deaths, in the period of this countrys participation in
the First World War." (Medical Voodoo, p. 27)
No tubercular men were inducted into the Army. It was alter the blood
poisoning vaccinations at camp that diseases of every description developed.
Then the men were invalided home by the thousands and dumped on society as
physical and mental wrecks. Many of these men had never been in battle nor had
even left American soil.
Dr. E. C. Rosenow, an experimentalist at the Mayo Clinic,
recorded in the Mayo Collected Papers (Vol. II, p. 92) that he found
"the vaccine serums injected into guinea pigs tended to localize in the lungs."
Edward Jenner inoculated his 18 months old son with
swine-pox, on November 1791 and again in April, 1798 with cow-pox. The boy was
never very well after that and died of tuberculosis at the age of 21.
In Barons Life of Jenner, (Vol. II, p. 304) we learn that,
"On the 14th of May, 1796 . . . Jenner vaccinated James Phipps, a boy about
eight years old, with the matter taken from the hand of a dairymaid infected
with casual cow-pox.
After waiting six weeks Jenner inoculated this boy on both arms with smallpox
matter, taken from the arm of a boy with smallpox. Several months later Phipps
was again inoculated with the variolous matter (smallpox pus)
but no effect was produced."
The inoculation didnt "take" so on the strength of this one experiment and
its questionable interpretation, Jenner based his claim that one vaccination
would "forever secure a person from smallpox." No time had elapsed to prove
whether it would last a lifetime or a month or at all; but without any proof or
any scientific basis or evidence for its practice, the doctors and the
government adopted it and made it compulsory, no doubt, seeing the gold mine in
profits that it would yield.
James Phipps was declared immune to smallpox but be too, died of
tuberculosis at the age of 20.
In Barons Life of Jenner, the author refers to Phipps
condition as follows:
"While walking with a friend one day they passed young Phipps, when Jenner
exclaimed, Oh, there is poor Phipps; I wish you could see him; he has been very
unwell lately and I am afraid he has got tuberculosis on his lungs. He was
recently inoculated for smallpox, I believe for the 20th time, and all without
As was previously stated, neither Jenner, with all his
fanfare and praise, nor the obscure Jesty, was the discoverer of inoculation. It
was a "carry-over" from very ancient times when superstitious fear and
guess-work dominated the healing field.
An idea of its ancient origin may be gathered from the "Lecture
Memoranda,"XVII International Congress of Medicine, London, 1913, which
"The practice of inoculation for the prevention of disease is one of
considerable antiquity. The period of its discovery can only be conjectured..."
"Dhanwantari, the Vedic Father of Medicine, and the earliest
known Hindu physician, who lived about 1,500 B.C., is supposed to have been the
first to practice inoculation for smallpox. It is even stated that the ancient
Hindus employed a vaccine, which they prepared by the transmission of the
smallpox virus through a cow." (History of Inoculation and Vaccination, pp. 6,
This common practice of disease transmission of both ancient and modern
tunes, undoubtedly, has a strong relationship to the plagues and epidemics that
sweep those countries where vaccination is still practiced.
If this method of disease prevention had ever been successful, smallpox would
have been eliminated from the world centuries ago, but smallpox persists in
localities where vaccination is compulsory and declines where it is abandoned in
favor of sanitation and hygienic measures.
The practice of inoculation spread like a noxious weed, from the savage
tribes of the forgotten past into the civilizations of Africa, Arabia, Tibet,
India and finally into Europe and America.
Dr. Clements in his pamphlet, "A Superstitious Custom"
traces the inoculation practices through the various modern countries previous
to Jenners day. He writes:
"In 1673 inoculation against smallpox appeared in Denmark; and in 1778, on
recommendation of the medical fraternity, two inoculation houses were
established by the king in the capitol.
"In Italy, inoculation was secretly practiced by the Neapolitans from early
times. It was freely performed by nurses, who inoculated infants, entrusted to
their care, without the knowledge of the parents.
"In 1722, Dr. Wright, a surgeon of Wales refers to
inoculation against smallpox in the British Isles as a very ancient custom. (Jenner
didnt begin his vaccinations until 1796). One William Allen, then 99 years old,
said inoculation had been known and used during his entire lifetime, and he well
remembered his mother stating that it had been commonly done all her life, and
that she got smallpox that way.
"The first record of inoculation in France appears in 1712,
and in 1763 a fatal epidemic of smallpox occurred in that country that wiped out
a large part of the population; it was attributed to inoculation and for a time
the Government prohibited the practice. Five years later, on the insistence of
the medical faculties, this decree was rescinded and by the latter part of the
18th century inoculation was again commonly practiced in that country.
"The first record of inoculation in Ireland appears in 1723,
when a medical doctor in Dublin inoculated 25 persons. Three of these died as a
result, and the custom was abandoned for some time.
Inoculation appears to have been first introduced in Germany
in 1724. It soon fell into disfavor, however, because of the many deaths in
Berlin from smallpox, as a result of it. After many years of diligent medical
propagandizing, the doctors were able to get the people to accept it again.
"In 1754, Peverani introduced inoculation for smallpox into Rome, but
smallpox soon began to spread and opposition rose to such a pitch that the
practice was discontinued, until the medical profession, after years of labor,
persuaded the people to again submit to it.
"One hundred forty-two years later, Carlo Ruta, Professor of Materia Medica
at the University of Perugia, Italy, protested against the
deadly custom in these scathing words:
"Vaccination is a monstrosity, a misbegotten offspring of error and
ignorance; and, being such, it should have no place in either hygiene or
medicine....Believe not in vaccination, it is a world-wide delusion, an
unscientific practice, a fatal superstition with consequences measured today by
tears and sorrow without end.
"In Ancient Greece and Rome, the MIGHTY NATIONS OF MIGHTY
MEN, there was no inoculation no vaccination and no smallpox." These nations
have been known down through history as being famous for their general habits of
health, cleanliness and stability as well as their vigor and strength. Among the
Greeks and Romans smallpox was unknown until it was carried there by the
inoculators from other countries.
In America, inoculation for smallpox appears to have been first introduced in
1721 by Cotton Mather, a clergyman. His method was that of
taking a toothpick and dipping it into the pus from a pustule of a smallpox
patient and smearing it into a scratch on the arm of a well person. He
inoculated 224 persons during the first six months of his experimentation. Six
of them died from poisoning, six had no apparent reaction at the time and the
rest suffered reactions of varying intensity.
"He was bitterly attacked for recommending such a practice," says Dr.
Clements, "and for a time his life was in danger. This incident encited strong
opposition to inoculation, in this country . . . A public meeting was called in
Boston where the practice was deprecated as causing the death of many persons.
"It was contended that the operation was likely to prove most dangerous to
those submitting to it. In the meeting the following resolution was agreed upon
and published by the public authorities:
"A resolve upon a debate by the people of Boston concerning inoculation of
smallpox, on the 21st day of July, 1721.
"It appears by numerous instances that it has proven the death of many
persons even after the operation, and brought distemper upon many others which
have in the end proven fatal to them; that the natural tendency of infusing such
malignant filth in the blood is to corrupt and putrefy it, and if there be not a
sufficient discharge of that malignity by the place of inoculation or elsewhere,
it lays the foundation for many dangerous diseases; that the operation tends to
spread and continue the infection in a place longer than otherwise might be (as
in the case of smallpox); that the continuance of the operation among us is
likely to prove of the most dangerous consequences.
"By the Select Men of the Town of Boston, July 22, 1721"
We observe, here, that the Founding Fathers of this country were intelligent
men who were vitally concerned with the health and welfare of the people whom
they governed. Although this was years before our revolution, these same men, no
doubt, played a part in shaping the destiny of this country. This was also
before the medical association got its strangle hold on the health of our people
and prostituted the art of healing to the business of making money without
giving "full value received". Those leaders with ideals and high purposes were
not able to hold the gilted-edge vaccination monster at bay
very long. The high pressure "tactics" of the serum promoters finally corrupted
the minds of the people and they were induced to submit to full scale
vaccination in many states. America, today, is unfortunately, one of the most
lucrative fields for medical exploitation.
Our Constitution promises the people freedom but the
enslavement of compulsory vaccination hounds the employees and personnel of our
tax supported institutions such as Civil Service, county and state hospitals and
institutions, state colleges, military service, many public schools and some
entire states. There is absolutely no proof of benefits from vaccination and no
sound basis for its compul
sion but it is forced into operation from year to year and the outraged
taxpayers are forced to pay for it.
The useless and hazardous but inflexible law that requires vaccination in
to travel abroad brands U. S. as backward and unscientific. Other countries
have learned the fallacy of vaccination and discarded it as worthless and
"Medical schools claim that the theory of inoculation is based on
scientific facts but history proves that this claim is false. What are
these so-called, scientific facts? Where are they (if any)?
Medical history discusses many theories and hypotheses,
but it describes no scientific facts. It is a gross
misrepresentation to hold that the superstitious practice of barbarians is
based on discoveries made in the fundamental sciences, or on scientific facts."
The testament from medical history itself proves that smallpox increased
tremendously after the enforcement of vaccination and at the present time there
are far more deaths and diseases from vaccination itself than from the diseases
the vaccinations are supposed to prevent. Figures and case histories to support
this statement are given elsewhere in this book and in many other books on
Lady Mary Wortly Montague was said to have been the one who introduced
inoculation into England in 1717 after she returned from the Orient (in Turkey,
where her husband was an ambassador). Inoculation was in its popular
experimental stage there at that time. The custom had probably been taken by the
Arabs into Africa, notably, those countries near the Red Sea. From there it may
have been taken into Europe by way of the Bosphorus. When Lady Montague spoke of
this practice of arm-to-arm inoculation to Jenner he said:
"Ay, but the Glouchestershire dairymaids have a better trick than that. They
say that if a person takes the cowpox from the cow, he will never after have
smallpox. Now cowpox is smallpox of the cow. Cowpox is not infectious; a
person once having cowpox will never have smallpox afterwards, and there are no
dangerous results to be anticipated, as there are with (arm-to-arm)
All these claims have been refuted by scientific findings, but as Jenner was
not a scientist he was satisfied to accept the opinions and superstitions of
unlearned dairymaids. Science has later presented sound proof that cowpox is not
the same as smallpox and does not protect from smallpox or even from cowpox.
Space will not permit the quoting of all the qualified authorities who
brought forth evidence that cowpox has no relation to smallpox and cannot
immunize against it. A few will show the trend in this direction.
in his comprehensive work, "THE VACCINATION PROBLEM" (pp. 87 102) gives the
results of government surveys and reports of doctors and scientists who
investigated this matter. He reports Sir Thomas Watson (the distinguished
surgeon and a believer in vaccination) who said:
"A little consideration will suffice to show that the vaccine disease is
suigeneris. In no sense does it own its origin to smallpox.
There is no such relation between the two. . . The true attitude of cowpox
towards smallpox is an attitude of antagonism." (British Medical Journal,
Jan. 17, 1880)
The renowned bacteriologist, E. M. Crookshank stated:
"COWPOX HAS NEVER BEEN CONVERTED INTO HUMAN SMALLPOX, AND IN THEIR CLINICAL
HISTORY AND EPIDEMIOLOGY, NATURAL COWPOX AND HUMAN SMALLPOX ARE SO DIFFERENT,
THAT THE COMPARATIVE PATHOLOGISIIS NO MORE PREPARED TO ADMIT THEIR IDENTITY
THAN HE IS PREPARED TO ADMIT THE IDENTITY OF COWPOX AND SHEEP-POX OR SMALLPOX
AND THE PLAGUE." (p. 328, Bacteriology and Infectious Diseases, Fourth Edition,
Dr. (later Sir) William Osler, one of the most highly
respected medical authorities, although an advocate of vaccination was forced,
by factual evidence to admit the dangers attending this practice. He did not
endorse Jenners exaggerated promises of lifetime immunity without
danger. In his "Principles and Practice of Medicine",
p. 330, 8th Edition, he wrote:
"With the greatest care (in vaccinating) certain risks are present . . . A
quiescent malady may be lighted into activity by vaccination. This has happened
with congenital syphilis, also with tuberculosis."
When Jenner promised the world that his cowpox vaccinations would give
lifetime immunity "with no dangerous results" as with the usual inoculations, he
admitted that inoculation had always been accompanied with danger that all
recognized. It was not long, however, before Jenners cowpox vaccinations were
followed by death and disease and that practice was also branded as dangerous
Regarding the increased death-rate due to vaccination, Herbert Spencer states
in his Facts and Comments:
"Jenner and his disciples have assumed that when the vaccine has passed
through the patients system he is safe against smallpox, and there the matter
ends . . . I propose to show that there the matter does not end. The
interference with the order of Nature has various sequences other than those
counted upon. Some have been made known.
"A Parliamentary Return issued in 1880 (No. 392) shows. . . that there was a
decrease of 6,600 (per million births) in the deaths of infants from all causes;
while the deaths caused by eight specified diseases, either directly
communicable or exacerbated by the effects of vaccination, increased from 20,524
to 41,353 per million births per annum more than double. It is clear that far
more were killed by these other diseases than were saved from smallpox."
Vaccination was made compulsory in England in 1853. Judging by the data from
the above quoted Parliamentary Return, it would appear that after 27 years of
enforced vaccination, the death rate increased only among the vaccinated
diseases. The decline in deaths from other causes was, no doubt, brought about
by the improvement in sanitation and nutrition that came into prominence about
that time. It was around 1840 that Sylvester Graham, Dr. Trall
and other pioneers of the new health movement emphasized the importance of
correct nutrition and through this teaching they helped raise the health
standards that saved many lives. If vaccination had not been persisted in, the
great improvements in sanitation and nutrition would have had a better chance to
eliminate disease. But as it is, we now have a greater scourge of killer
diseases than at any other time in recorded history; and much of it is traceable
Dr. W. R. Hadwin
who had considerable experience with smallpox patients in the hospitals of
England and had seen the tragic results of vaccination, gave lecture in
Liverpool where he discussed the typical excuses and evasions made by Jenner
regarding the complaints and failures of his vaccinations. Excerpts from this
lecture are as follows:
"Now, after Jenner had written a paper on this wonderful legend of the
dairymaids, there came forward on every hand no end of cow-doctors who had a
large experience in the matter, and had literally flooded him with evidence of
people who had had cowpox vaccinations and later contracted smallpox.
"Here was proof that he could not ignore . . . But Jenner was one of the most
resourceful men in excuse making that ever lived; let anyone read his and there
will be no difficulty in coming to that conclusion.
"Ay, said Jenner, There are two kinds of smallpox; there is a genuine kind
and a spurious kind, (laughter from the audience) and those who have been
vaccinated and had smallpox afterwards, they have been vaccinated with spurious
cowpox, but those who have been vaccinated and have not had smallpox afterwards,
they have been inoculated with the genuine variety." (laughter)
Jenner had no answer when asked how to tell the difference between spurious
and genuine cowpox. Neither he nor anyone else was able to find a safe vaccine,
yet the vaccinations were continued without interruption with the same
questionable vaccines that had no proof of purity or assurance of safety. The
people reminded Jenner that a person is just as dead whether he died of spurious
or genuine smallpox and it was little comfort to know that he and the government
approved of the vaccine used.
When Jenner was confronted with the evidence that a group of people had been
vaccinated with the same batch of vaccine but some had developed smallpox and
others did not, he told them that those who were unfortunate enough to get
smallpox must have been vaccinated too soon or too late after exposure to
smallpox. But he never was able to determine just when was the right time to
vaccinate. As many of the casualties were among his own patients it was clear
that the whole procedure was operated on a basis of guesswork.
In spite of the obvious failure of vaccination, Jenner applied to the English
Government for money to promote his scheme. It was on the strength of the
dairymaids story and his groundless promise of lifetime immunity, and his
unscientific experiment on James Phipps that Parliament gave him 10 000 in 1802.
Either Jenner had an unusual gift of persuasion or the English government was a
victim of "wishful thinking" for in 1807 Jenner talked them out another 20,000
pounds which amounted to 30,000 pounds in all, ($150,000) public funds with
which to propagate his vaccination diseases and death throughout the world.
When Jenner made the statement that one vaccination would give lifelong
protection against smallpox he seemed to expect that people would regard him as
some great Oracle whose words would never be questioned. Even after deaths had
occurred from vaccination he brazenly submitted a manuscript to the
Royal College of Surgeons entitled, "An Inquiry into the Causes
and Effects of Variolae Vaccine" in which he again stated his theory, "
. . . What renders the cowpox virus so extremely singular is, that the
person who has been thus affected is forever after secure from the infusion of
smallpox; neither exposure to the various effluvia nor the insertion of
the matter into the skin producing the malady."
The complaints continued to pour in but Jenner ignored the facts and like one
possessed by an obsession he wrote in his third publication an answer to the
objectors as follows: "Some there are who suppose the security (Immunity)
obtained through the cowpox will be of temporary nature only. This supposition
is refuted, not only by analogy with respect to the habits of disease of a
similar kind, but by incontrovertible facts, which appear again its. . ." (Baron
1, p. 490)
Where (we ask) are these incontrovertible facts? No one has
seen them and Jenner never did bring them forth. But Jenner and a certain class
of doctors had discovered that vaccination could be a paying business even if
they couldnt make it work; so from then on, the colossal advertising program
was set up to propagandize the population into believing in vaccination.
Lord Lyttleton must have had a stake in this multi-million dollar enterprise
when he stated in the House of Lords: "It is unnecessary to speak of the
certainty of vaccination as a preventive of smallpox, that being a point on
which the whole medical profession has arrived at complete unanimity."
This statement was not quite true because all the enlightened
doctors, (of which there were not a great many) condemned
vaccination. But the words of Lyttleton had their desired effect on the people
and that was the purpose of the speech. Everything possible was done to suppress
the facts that revealed the dismal failure of vaccination.
According to Thomas Morgan in his Medical Delusions
(p. 48-49) "Jenner soon discovered that vaccination did not give immunity from
smallpox, including some who had been vaccinated by himself and had died from
it. Not wishing to bring vaccination into disrepute, he endeavored to suppress
reports, and in writing to a friend, said, I wish my professional
brethren to be slow to publish fatal results after vaccination. and in
1810 he wrote: When I found Dr. Woodworth about to publish his pamphlet
relative to the eruption (smallpox) cases at the Smallpox Hospital, I entreated
him in the strongest terms, both by letter and conversation, not to do a thing
that would so disturb the progress of vaccination. (Barrons Life of
"The foregoing plainly proves that Jenner himself was aware of the utter
uselessness of vaccination; but, having received the bounty from the government
he preferred to resort to all kinds of schemes rather than acknowledge its
"From its inception until the present day, the vaccination scheme has been an
endless record of lies, deception, fraud, juggling statistics, and falsifying
death certificates in order to preserve vaccination from reproach and to secure
its continuation. . . and all this after more than a century of terrible
experience, which has demonstrated that vaccination has killed more than
smallpox, besides crippling and disfiguring millions more."
In his work on The Value of Vaccination (pp. 68-69)
Dr. William Winterburn says that even "The Royal Jennerian Society"
(under Jenners direction) in its second report in 1806, "Admitted having seen a
few cases of smallpox in persons who had passed through the cowpox in the usual
way." He says further:
"In the same year the Royal College of Surgeons issued a circular letter to
1,000 of its members asking their experience with vaccination. They received 426
answers, with the information of 56 cases of smallpox in the vaccinated, 66
cases of eruption and 24 bad arms."
The London MEDICAL OBSERVER, (VoL VI, 1810) published particulars of
"535 CASES OF SMALLPOX AFTER VACCINATION the operation having been performed
in some of them by Jenner himself including their names and the authorities
reporting them; and similar details of 97 FATAL CASES OF SMALLPOX IN THE
VACCINATED, with 150 cases of serious injury arising from vaccination among whom
were 10 medical men with their names and addresses including two professors
of anatomy, who had suffered from the operation in their own families." (Medical
Voodoo Hale p. 85)
Winterburn gives additional proof of the failure of
vaccination to protect from smallpox, in a report of a "Severe epidemic in
Marseilles when 2,000 vaccinated persons were stricken with smallpox;
and the epidemic of 1831 in Wurttemberg when 995 protected ones
succumbed to the prevailing malady."
When Jenner was faced with the disturbing fact that vaccination with cowpox
was as much a failure as the previous inoculations with human smallpox, he
invented all manner of excuses which were as unconvincing as they were useless.
His onetrack mind seemed to admit no other thought except pus. So when cow or
human putrescence didnt prevent smallpox he continued to experiment with other
varieties. He noticed that in the suppurating cracks in the feet of diseased
horses there was a putrid mass of pus. This disease was called "horse grease" by
some people but was considered, by some veterinarians, to be a form of syphilis
of the horse. Others said it was a type of consumption or
wasting disease. For some unaccountable reason, Jenner thought this pus would be
a good addition to his discredited vaccines so he injected it into a cow and
produced a disease in the cow. With the concoction of pus from the diseased
horse and cow he made a serum. When the people learned what he had done they
protested so violently that Dr. Pearson wrote to Jenner immediately and said,
"For Gods sake take the horse out, or you will damn the whole
Following that incident Jenner wrote to a friend and said, "I am on the
look-out to be able to make a fortune; and to appease the public." Then, as Dr.
Hadwin related in his famous lecture, "Jenner decided to take the horse
out. But he was still faced with the problem of finding genuine
cowpox. This he was never able to do. . In sheer desperation, he fell
back upon spontaneous cowpox although he had declared
previously, it was absolutely useless in preventing smallpox. And it is this
spontaneous cowpox vaccine, this which was denounced by Edward Jenner, this
which was scouted by the so-called inventor himself as absolutely useless in
protecting against smallpox; this is the stuff that is being used today under
the name of pure calf lymph smallpox vaccine and before which the
medical profession is bowing, while professing to follow in the footsteps of
"There is not one medical man in 10,000 who has ever seen cowpox in a cow . .
- and very few who have seen a case of smallpox so they really know very little
about it. There are two things the medical profession should learn: The first is
to know smallpox when they see it; and the next Is, to know how to treat it when
they do see it." (The Vaccination Delusion, by W. R.
"We will suppose" said Dr. Hadwin, "for the sake of argument, that cowpox is
smallpox (as some doctors still claim) and that when you give a person cowpox
-----that is when you vaccinate him you give him a mild (or severe) sort of
smallpox. Jenner himself, said, Cowpox does not prevent smallpox; it is
smallpox. So that, according to that theory, you are literally "smallpoxing" a
person when you vaccinate him.. . Jenner said, A person once vaccinated is
forever after secure from smallpox and that, re-vaccination would rob
his discovery of half its virtues. But what is the medical propaganda
telling you? The doctors know that vaccination will not protect you against
another vaccination. If one cowpox inoculation will not protect you from being
cow-poxed again, how on earth is it going to protect you from being smallpoxed?
Why, the very theory of re-vaccination is condemnatory of the whole creed. If it
cannot protect against a mild form in vaccination how can it protect one from a
serious form of smallpox? The most amazing thing on earth is the fact that the
medical men cannot see this." (The Vaccination Delusion Dr. Hadwin)
The Editor of "TRUTH" (London) answers a complaint in an editorial of his
publication as follows:
"In his article, The Fraud of Vaccination, published last
week in "TRUTH, Dr. Hadwin
made some remarks not altogether complimentary to Jenner, the (self proclaimed)
discoverer of vaccination. These remarks led one reader to denounce both Dr.
Hadwin and myself Dr. Hadwin for libeling one of the greatest benefactors of
humanity (she thinks) and myself for propagating the libel. Dr. Hadwin is well
able to take care of himself. For my own part, not wishing to do any injustice
to the name and fame of the late Dr. Jenner, I asked Dr. Hadwin what he had
against him and he replied by sending me a pamphlet he had written on the
subject. This I have compared with the account of Jenners life given in the "Dictionary
of National Biography," and the result is so illuminating that I will
now give the salient facts as briefly as possible.
"To begin with, it is clear that Jenner never possessed anything that would
be recognized today as a medical qualification. At the age of 16 he was
apprenticed to a country doctor and apothecary and at 21 he was sent for two
years as a pupil to Dr. John Hunter of London. At 23 Jenner returned to his
native village and started to practice as a surgeon and apothecary. He continued
for several years as just a plain, unqualified country doctor. At the end of
this time be made his first bid for fame. In l787 he sent a paper on "The
Natural History of the Cuckoo" to the Royal Society, and as a result,
with Hunters influence he was elected F.R.C. Three years later he applied to
St. Andrews University for an M.D. degree, and as St. Andrews, in those days,
was not squeamish about degrees so long as the fees were forthcoming, Jenner
became Doctor Jenner for the modest sum of 15 pounds. (about $75.00 in those
"As for the vaccination discovery it appears to have been founded upon what
Dr. Hadwin calls a superstition among the dairymaids" (The editorial continues
with the history of vaccination as already covered in this chapter so I do not
think it is necessary to repeat it He concludes his article with this
What strikes me as remarkable about the whole affair is the ease with which
Jenner got his theory accepted . . . It is true that medical research in the
19th century was not what it is today, but even then the picture of the whole of
the College of Physicians and Surgeons swallowing the theory of an unqualified
country apothecary, based on one totally unreliable experiment, seems scarcely
credible ..I should imagine that he was one of those unscientific researchers
who are always on the lookout for facts to fit their theories, instead of first
making of their facts"
Dr. J. W. Hodge, of New York, had extensive experience with smallpox
epidemics and vaccination epidemics also. Out of his wealth of knowledge on this
subject he wrote on all its phases. In a published article dealing with
"Some of the False Claims, Erroneous Deductions and Self Contradictions of the
of the Vaccination Dogma" he stated:
"At first it was confidently asserted that vaccination would exterminate
small-pox. That claim has been abandoned by Jenners most enthusiastic
followers and the claim that re-vaccination will exterminate smallpox, was set
up in its stead. The proof that the theory and the practice espoused by Jenner
have been everywhere abandoned is found in the fact that all vaccinists now
admit the necessity of re-vaccination, but do not agree on the period that may
be allowed between successive repetitions of the protective (?) rite.
"If you ask how often it must be repeated, you will be confronted with a
babel of discordant replies You can choose any answer you please from once
only of the original Jenner up to an indefinite repetition, until it
no longer takes, as now prescribed by the Chicago Vaccination
This "Vaccination Creed" formulated by the Chicago Health Department in 1902
stated "True vaccination repeated until it no longer "takes" always prevents
smallpox. Nothing else does."
Regarding this fantastic assertion, Dr. Hodge has this to say:
"The above dogmatic deliverance aptly illustrates the recklessness of the
disciples of Jenner in making bold asseverations in favor of vaccination which
scorn the slightest attempt at verification."
The frequent and variegated vaccinations given to our service men give us a
full-scale picture of what "repeated vaccination until it no longer
takes" will do to the body and brain. Thousands of our healthiest men
at the prime of life were rendered insane and millions of others were infected
with disease of every description including the very ones they were "protected"
against. A typical example is that of our Philippine soldiers. According to our
military records: "Every enlisting soldier is subjected to vaccination at the
time of being recruited, and revaccinated, not only on entering the U S Army,
but also as often after that as seems advisable by the Army medical authorities
" Chief Surgeon of the U. S. Philippine Army, said in his report, regarding the
high incidence of smallpox among his vaccinated men "I can say that no Army was
ever morethoroughly looked after in the matter of vaccination than ours.
AND RE-VACCINATION MANY TIMES REPEATED WENT AS REGULARLY AS THE DRILLS AT A
REGULAR POST." (emphasis supplied)
Yet, the records show a steady increase of smallpox among these men:
In 1888 there were 76 cases of smallpox and 21 deaths from this cause.
In 1890 there were 207 cases of smallpox and 78 deaths from this cause.
In 1900 there were 246 cases of smallpox and 113 deaths from this cause.
246 cases of smallpox and 113 deaths among the thoroughly and frequently
vaccinated men would hardly bear out the claim of the Chicage Creed, that says:
"repeated re-vaccination always prevents smallpox and nothing else does."
Jenner and his followers had committed themselves to the view that
Vaccination gave life-long immunity to smallpox. Therefore, they asserted that
re-vaccination was not merely unnecessary, but impossible."
Dr. Pearson, one of Jenners strongest supporters said, "If a child can be
reaccinated, then it can take smallpox; therefore, vaccination is not an
equivalent for smallpox and where, then, is the good of it?" (Medical Gazette,
Dr. Pearson also stated, "It has been found that a person whose constitution
has distinctly undergone the vaccine disease is in the future, unsusceptible of
that same disease." (I wonder where he found that remarkable person.)
Here is an authority on the Jenner theory who promises that if the
vaccination "takes" then a person cannot ever have another vaccination that will
"take". This fortunate person is then supposed to be immune to both smallpox and
vaccination reactions (vaccina).
The cases of smallpox and vaccination diseases and deaths continued to
increase in large numbers among Jenners prize patients so he and his supporters
had to retreat behind a bulwark of excuses. As usual, these failed to shield
them from the rise of public indignation, so Jenner had to discard the
impossible claim of life-time immunity in order to hold onto
the vaccination fantasy at all.
Although they had previously taught that re-vaccination
would cancel any hope of protection from vaccination,
they nevertheless, changed their policy and advocated re-vaccination. They had
learned, undeniably, that vaccination would not work and were to learn later
that re-vaccination was even more disastrous but it was continued in spite of
In 1860 the Encyclopedia Britannica (Eighth Edition) stated:
"Nothing is more likely to prove hurtful to the cause of vaccination and
render the public careless of securing to themselves its benefits, than the
belief that they would require to submit to re-vaccination every 10 to 15
Years later, the Eleventh Edition of the Encyclopedia shows the change of
policy when it states:
"It is desirable that the operation (vaccination) should be repeated at the
age of from 7 to 10 years, and thereafter, if it be possible, at intervals
during life." (The more often the vaccinations, the greater the revenue to the
doctors and vaccine promoters. This is the prime consideration in this
Since numerous examples of the failure of re-vaccination are given throughout
this book, only a few will be mentioned in this chapter to show its position in
the history of vaccination.
Dr. Sobatta, of the German Army gave a report of 154
soldiers who had been vaccinated four times with a lapse of a year and a half
between shots. 146 of these cases had reactions of vaccina, indicating that the
vaccinations and revaccinations did not protect for even one and one-half years.
Some startling results of re-vaccination experiments were published by the
German Vaccination Commission in 1884. The experiments were made on 30 boys
ranging in age from 8 to 14 years. Five of them had had smallpox within the
previous two years; four of them had been vaccinated. The vaccinations were
repeated every eight days with the following results:
Percent of Reactions
The report stated that the 7 boys on the top row (including the 4 who had had
smallpox) had reactions of vaccina indicating that neither smallpox nor
revaccination had protected them for even three weeks. The 9 boys on the second
row who had reactions showed that 67 per cent of the group did not have immunity
that lasted even 8 days. Then the 7 boys on the top row who had been
re-vaccinated were re-vaccinated again and 6 of them "took" which showed that 86
per cent of the group did not receive the promised immunity for as long as one
week. The other boy in that group of 7 was reported as unsuccessful because he
had developed dysentery during that week. This is an interesting point because
it bears out the contention that when poisons are introduced into the body the
healing mechanism attempts to expel them by way of diarrhea, mucous discharge,
eruptions, etc. The diarrhea was, no doubt, one of the reactions of vaccina
which would indicate that his vaccination also "took", making re-vaccination a
100 per cent failure in that group.
This is concrete proof that vaccination or re-vaccination does not protect
against itself, or against smallpox and has no constructive quality to recommend
One of the favorite arguments of the exponents of re-vaccination is the claim
that the re-vaccinated nurses in smallpox hospitals do not get smallpox. It
would be more accurate to say that the records of the casualties
of these re-vaccinated nurses are not made public. We read in the chapter on
Falsified Death Certificates (Book II) that it is an accepted
custom among doctors, to withhold from the death certificate the real
cause of death when nurses (and sometimes when patients) die of smallpox
after vaccination; some other causes are given. However, occasionally
the private records are seen and it is then found that the vaccinated and
re-vaccinated personnel show a higher incidence of smallpox and other diseases
than do the unvaccinated laymen.
Many records and testimonies were brought forth when the Royal
Vaccination Commission was making its investigation of this
re-vaccination question. W. J. Collins, M.D. and J. A. Piecton,
two of these Commissioners, after weighing the evidence of hundreds of witnesses
who had testified before the Royal Commission, recorded their joint conclusions
on this matter in the minority report (p. 61, par. 152) as follows:
"When we consider the large number of attacks and deaths by smallpox which
have occurred among our thoroughly re-vaccinated army . . . as well as the
number and fatality of re-vaccinated persons attacked by smallpox in London and
at Warrington and Dewsbury, we are forced to the conclusion that the remarkable
immunity recorded in the cases of nurses in smallpox hospitals cannot be
accounted for by the fact that they have been re-vaccinated.
"In the hospital at Bicetre during the siege of Paris, in the midst of a
larger accumulation of smallpox patients than has ever been known before or
since, the immunity of those attendants and doctors who neglected
re-vaccination was even more marked than in the case of the orderlies who were
nearly all re-vaccinated. We attach considerable importance to the
narrative given by M. Colin, Chief Medical Officer to the Bicetre Hospital
during the siege.
"The point of this narrative is that while 15 of the re-vaccinated or well
protected orderlies took the disease (smallpox), not one of the 80 who composed
the medical and nursing staff, so many of whom had neglected re-vaccination, was
"It is sufficiently clear," declared the Royal Vaccination Commissioners,
"that M. Cohn, though an impassioned advocate of vaccination, was so struck with
the complete immunity of the medical and nursing staff, who by their neglect of
re-vaccination appeared to offer less guarantee of protection than the
orderlies, nearly all of whom had been re-vaccinated under his own eyes, that he
thought it necessary to attempt some explanation." (THE VACCINATION PROBLEM, by
Swan, p. 8)
Japan is one of the most glaring examples of the failure of vaccination and
re-vaccination. Dr. Ruta, in his review of world statistics on smallpox
"Between 1886 and 1892, there were 25,474,370 vaccinations and
re-vaccinations performed in Japan, which meant that about two-thirds of the
entire Japanese population, already vaccinated by the law of 1872, were
re-vaccinated. During that 7-year period (1886-1892) of thorough
re-vaccination, there were reported 165,774 cases of smallpox with 28,979 deaths."
When our U. S. Army of occupation moved into Japan after World War II, we
could have been the means of liberating these needy people from this curse of
medical ignorance, but instead, our medical, drug and chemical companies moved
in also with their program of exploitation, and as a result, under the MacArthur
regime, "The people were given the largest immunization and vaccination
treatment in history. Every Japanese, received two smallpox shots making a total
of 160 million vaccinations." (LIFE Aug. 22, 1955)
"The chief, if not the sole cause of the monstrous increase in
cancer has been vaccination."Dr. Robert Bell, the famous cancer specialist of
the British Cancer Hospital.
We do not claim that vaccination is the only cause of cancer although Dr.
Bell (quoted above) observed so many cases of cancers at the site of the
vaccination and elsewhere, but directly traced to this cause that he affirmed
that vaccination was the cause of the great increase in the cancer rate.
Dr Bell is just one of the many authorities who have been faced with theuncomfortable realization that the blood contamination from vaccines is one
of the leading causes of cancer.
Dr. E. J. Post, a prominent physician of Berlmont, Michigan, said:
"I HAVE REMOVED CANCERS FROM VACCINATED ARMS EXACTLY WHERE THE POISON WAS
In the New York Press, January 26, 1909, W. B. Clark stated:
"Cancer was practically unknown until cowpox vaccination began to be
introduced. I have had to do with 200 cases of cancer and I NEVER SAW A
CASE OF CANCER IN AN UNVACCINATED PERSON."
Dr. Herbert Snow, Surgeon of the London Cancer Hospital, had this to say:
"I am convinced that some 80 per cent of these cancer deaths are
caused by the inoculations or vaccinations they have undergone. These
are well-known to cause grave and permanent disease of the heart also."
Dr. Dennis Turnbull, who had studied cancer for 30 years declared:
"I have no hesitation in stating that in my judgement the most
frequent disposing condition for cancerous development is infused into the blood
by vaccination and re-vaccination."
Dr. Forbes Laurie, late Medical Director of the Metropolitan Cancer Hospital,
"I am thoroughly convinced that the increase of cancer is due to
In his book CANCER AND VACCINATION, Esculapius says:
"No candid and scientific inquirer who has read the works of such authorities
as Doctors Creighton, Crookshank and Scott Tebb, can be surprised that an
alarming increase in cancer is now evident. Those who adopt the brutal practice
of calf-lymph vaccination are but too surely sowing the wind which they must
inevitably reap as the whirlwind, a whirlwind of corruption, disease and
national deterioration. Where the so-called, human lymph is
employed, syphilis, leprosy and tuberculosis follow in its train; and wherever
calf-lymph is used, tuberculosis and cancer spread like a
Sir Thomas Paget (M.D.), tells us that "the progress of vaccine infection in
the blood shows us that a permanent morbid condition is established; in the
tissues themselves, it is also established by this specific poison."
Dr. Benchetrit states that serums and vaccines "are principally responsible
for the increase of those two really dangerous diseases, cancer and heart
Dr. F. P. Millard, prominent Osteopath of Toronto and President of the
National League for Prevention of Spinal Curvature says: "Abolish vaccination,
and you will cut the cancer death-rate in half."
Although there have been thousands of cancers caused by vaccination space
will not permit the reviewing of the case histories or even a small fraction of
them. The photographs below will give an idea of the tragic condition and
intense suffering brought about by this curse of the modern age vaccination.
Mrs Helen Goates of Bolivar, Missouri was a strong, healthy woman with no
skin trouble or chronic disease when she was persuaded, during a vaccination
drive, to submit to vaccination. Almost immediately, after the injection, an
inflamed swelling started to develop around the vaccination. It continued to
increase in size and intensity until it covered her entire arm and hand.
After a period of time it spread over her back and breast as is shown in the
She was treated by more than a dozen doctors and cancer specialists but
the condition grew steadily worse until death relieved her of her agony.
Before her death she requested that a photograph be taken of the cancer in
order that others might see the results of vaccination and be warned, in
time against this ever present danger of vaccine poisoning.
The cancer does not always start immediately. It usually takes months or
years for the poisons to degenerate enough tissue for a cancer to form.
Photograph by permission of Harbison Printers, Oceano, Calif.
It is for this reason that most doctors fail to recognize
the connection between the vaccinations and the cancers. The following
photograph is an example of a later development.
Benjamin F. Olevine of Altoona, Pennsylvania, was vaccinated when in good
health. Two months later a sarcomatous (tumorous) growth began to develop
where the vaccination sore had not healed. The growth reached enormous
proportions, as may be seen from the photograph, and caused intense pain and
untold suffering, not, only in the arm but throughout the entire body. No
cure was possible and his misery was relieved only by death.
(Photo from VACCINATION AND THE MEDICAL PROFESSION) Case XXV
The 1955 advertising circular sent out by the American Cancer Society,
"Cancer will strike one of every four persons now living
according to the present estimates.
"MORE CHILDREN FROM 3 TO 15 YEARS OF AGE DIE OF CANCER THAN FROM ANY OTHER
This is a shocking, tragic situation when we consider that just a short time
ago less than 50 years cancer was unheard of among children. It was, even
then, a rare disease associated with old age degeneration. But today, after the
intensive vaccination programs conducted several times a year in the schools,
cancer has become so prevalent that it is now taking a death toll among the
children that is almost unbelievable.
According to the report of the American Cancer Society, "The cancer death
rate has increased from 65 persons per 100,000 in 1900 to 134.8 persons per
100,000 in 1948."
Newsweek magazine (April 25, 1955) stated that cancer took
128,000 lives in 1933. In 1953 (just 20 years later) the death rate from cancer
had increased to 224,000 with an estimated cost of $175,000,000 in hospital
bills and $12,000,000 yearly loss of productivity of the afflicted.
The recent 1955 report of the American Cancer Society, stating that cancer
strikes one out of every four persons in the United States, means that 25 per
cent of the people are cancerous. Our present population is 160,000,000. Every
fourth person, or 25 per cent of our population amounts to 6,400,000 people. Is
this our present cancer rate, as compared to only 224,000 two years ago in 1953?
If these figures are right then our cancer rate has increased from 128,000 in
1933 to 6,400,000 in 1955 which is an increase of 6,272,000 cases of cancer in
the short span of 22 years. This staggering increase in a
preventable disease is a grave reflection upon our present
system of living with its popularized blood pollution practices
by way of vaccination campaigns and mass poisoning
as a result of government enforced spraying of fruits and vegetables
with deadly lead arsenate and other poisons. The power politics of the
drug and chemical companies have also influenced legislation to set aside vast
sums of the taxpayers money with which to buy their poison chemicals, such as
chlorine, fluorides, etc., for contaminating the public water supply and for
enforcing tuberculin testing of cows. The people are told that these practices
are beneficial but facts disclaim these statements. (See the chapters on DRUGS
vs. HEALTH and THE CASE AGAINST TUBERCULIN Book II)
Dr. S. S. Goldwater, New York Commissioner of Hospitals pointed out in The
Modern Hospital Magazine that the present measures used to check
contagious diseases may permit of longer life but not of stronger life.
As a result of the drugs, vaccines and other suppressive treatments used to
check diseases, he says that, "chronic diseases are growing at such a
rate that America may become a nation of invalids. Over half the
hospital beds are filled with chronic sufferers, both old and young." (from
Health Practitioners Journal, June, 1944)
There is no argument against the urgent need for the prevention and cure of
cancer. Doctors as well as laymen recognize the dangers of this advancing
menace; but there is great confusion and conflict regarding theories and
practices used in treating cancer. The medical and non-medical schools of
healing have opposing views which set up a state of warfare between them instead
of the unity and cooperation that should prevail in order to solve this critical
problem.. A few of the drugless doctors are using cancer treatments that are 80
per cent more effective in removing cancer than those used and endorsed by the
medical profession as a whole. But the monopolistic domination of the A.M.A.
constantly thwarts these efforts toward improvement because they cannot collect
It is no secret that the newspapers are also muzzled by the A.M.A., and are
not permitted to publish any health news, or information or advertise any books
about health without the sanction of the Medical gestapo
through their hirelings in the Better Business Bureaus. If health information
reflects unfavorably on the medical profession or exposes its rackets it is
immediately suppressed no matter how factual and critical to life it may be. The
health books in tax supported public libraries and schools are also limited to
the out-of-date, erroneous, "slanted" data passed upon or written by medical
Because of this medically made iron curtain, the public is
shown only one side of the cancer picture and is constantly being drilled on the
one theme endorsed by the medical hierarchy that "there are only three
proved ways and only three to curb cancer (1) X-ray, (2) radium,
(3) and surgery, either singly or in combination. . . " (From CANCER FACTS
1955 by the American Cancer Society)
If it is true, as they state, that the medical profession has three
proved ways to cure cancer, why is there such a rapid increase in
cancer every year? Why do we see thousands of deaths occurring all the time, of
those who have been treated by these "proved" methods? Also, why do we have this
never ending fund raising cancer campaigns to support laboratories that are
supposed to be hunting a cure for cancer? If one of these
claims is true, it cancels out the other; that is: if they have a proved cure
for cancer then it proves that the cancer campaigns are merely money
making schemes for the pleasure and profit of the promoters. On the
other hand, if they know that they have no cure and are
deliberately taking money (large sums) from their patients under the false
pretenses of offering a proved cure THAT DOES NOT CURE, but instead OFTEN KILLS
THE PATIENTS, THEN THEY ARE ENGAGED IN FRAUDULENT PRACTICES and should be dealt
with accordingly. The law is not lenient with fraud cases, even when they do no
bodily harm. Many innocent drugless practitioners and writers of non-medical
health books have been barred from the mails on fraud charges merely because
they disagreed with accepted medical theories. (See chapter on
Medical authorities, themselves, have estimated that "over 90 per
cent of the medically diagnosed cases of cancer die of it in spite of frequent
applications of both surgery and radiation." Dr. James Ewing, one of
the "expert witnesses" at a Senate hearing, admitted this high death rate of
medically treated cancer and further voiced the pessimistic view that he "did
not believe there is any reasonable expectation of a great discovery entering
the cancer field in this age." This indicates that he also believes that the
cancer campaigns and laboratories are merely in the business for profit.
Although most of the confessions of failure have been made in the privacy of
the medical conference chambers, a few of them have reached the public by way of
reports in medical journals and sometime through legal investigation. One of the
voluntary confessions was made by Dr. Raballiati, who stated, "In the early part
of my career I performed over 500 major operations for cancer and growths, and
it was the uniform lack of success with the knife that caused me to search for
other means of more effectively treating cancer though without success."
At the Atlantic City Convention of the American Medical Association, when
each cancer specialist was asked what was the cause of cancer, each one in turn
admitted he did not know. One of them said, "I admit I know neither the cause
nor the cure of cancer and neither do you, not anyone else here."
This statement, no doubt, voices the orthodox medical view regarding cancer.
If they did know the cause of this disease they would not use
the three hazardous treatments they claim are the only "proved cures".
Outside the medical field and among the few independent physicians who dare
to think for themselves, there are to be found those who do know
the cause and cure of cancer because they understand the underlying cause of
disease in general. Only when this is known can the right
approach to prevention and cure be attempted with any certainty of success.
Dr. Herbert M. Shelton is one of these men with a clear view
as to the cause and control of disease. In an article in The Hygienic
Review, for April, 1949 he writes:
"Cancer has no secret. It is but a part of general pathology (disease). It is
an end-point in a chain of pathological sequences that need only to be watched
to be recognized. There is no specific cause of cancer. It is merely another and
final link in the pathological chain that began in infancy with the first cold.
It is. a product of pathological evolution...
"They (the medical profession) insist upon viewing cancer as some spontaneous
horror that suddenly springs upon its victims from out of the void. They refuse
to recognize the office of the general causes of pathology in the production of
"So long as cancer "research" is only a search for a "cancer secret" that,
after all, is but a figment of the imagination, their experiments will continue
to be sterile repetitions of experiments that have already been performed .
"What, then, is the cause of cancer? It is an evolution out
of toxemia (poisoning). Toxemia is a chronic state, due to
ones enervating (depleting) mode of living. Toxemia produces the chronic local
irritative conditions that form the site of cancer. External irritations such as
tobacco, mineral oil, alcohol, spices, coal tar products, drugs, etc., may and
do add to the cause in many cases, but it is noteworthy that only a few of those
subjected to these irritants develop cancer. In the absence of sufficient tissue
degeneration from chronic toxemia, the body successfully resists these
J. Ellis Barker has this to say regarding the cause of
cancer (This quotation is from his book on cancer, foreworded by Sir Arbuthnot
Lane, famous English Surgeon and physician to the Royal Family of England.):
"The cause of cancer is two-fold: (1) chronic poisoning and (2) vitamin
starvation." (The required vitamins do not include the manufactured products by
that name many of which are coal tar products and injurious in
themselves. The only vitamins worthy of the name are to be found in natural,
unprocessed foods such as vegetables and fruits, nuts and grams Eleanor McBean)
"The poison may be introduced from without or generated from within. In the
former class are aniline and paraffin fumes, deep burns of any kind including
X-ray and radium burns, and arsenical poisons
(as in arsenic insecticides sprayed on fruits and vegetables) whether breathed
in through the lungs or taken as medicine into the system through the mouth or
by subcutaneous injection." Mr. Barker quotes other authorities to show that
"continued medical use of arsenic, even in extremely small doses, may lead to
cancer after 20 years or more, and even after the discontinuance of the drug."
He referred to the Silesian miners in the cobalt mines of Schineeverg, "who
developed a most unusual form of cancer, cancer of the lungs, from breathing in
arsenic after having been employed in the mines for more than
20 years." (Medical Voodoo, p. 207)
Dr. George S. Weger, a "reformed" medical doctor who rose
head and shoulders above his colleagues, summed up the cancer situation, in his
"Genesis and Control of Disease. (p. 334). He wrote:
"No germ for cancer has yet been found, and, in the authors opinion none
ever will be found. Cancer is one disease that is distinctive of toxemia,
(poisoning) plus trauma, plus irritation. It occurs most
frequently in selective areas but may be found anywhere in the body. No
infection of secondary nature is necessary to make this abnormality a cancer by
conversion from something else. If a cancerous mass breaks down, softens, and
suppurates, it is usually in a late stage and signifies a serious breach in the
defenses the vitality of the individual and the toxemia then immediately
takes on the characteristics of sepsis which destroys the life of the blood.
"Some specialists advance the theory that cancer activity is dependent upon a
vegetable parasite, a protozoa, identified as Trichomonas. It
is conceded, however, that this parasite (if any) is not capable of producing
cancer without the accompaniment of two other important factors: first, proper
soilage (toxemia); second, continued irritation or injury."
Another cancer authority who recognized that toxemia or internal poisons
cause cancer, is Dr. Robert Bell, Vice-President of the
International Society for Cancer Research. His statement in The
Medical Record for March, 1922 reads as follows: -
"Cancer is rooted in every drop of blood in the body, and we
may as well expect to stop the growing of apples by picking them off the trees.
. . as to expect to destroy malignancy in the human body by attacking the
outward growth .. For depend on it, every cell of the body is affected, and has
been affected for a long period, prior to the appearance of the local outcrop. .
. In my view, cancer is the outcome of prolonged toxemia, and a
vitiated (polluted) blood supply affecting the nervous system and the efficiency
of the endocrine glands, which explains the absence of healthy-metabolism and
the dire disturbance which we call cancer."
Without going into technical detail on this subject it is, nevertheless,
important to show the relationship of the lymphatic glands to vaccinal
cancer. The lymph vessels form a fine network that interpenetrates the
connective tissue and covers the entire body. The continuity of these lymph
vessels "is interrupted by interposed nodular aggregations of lymph tissue which
are known as lymph glands." (Textbook of Anatomy Cunningham)
One of the functions of the lymph glands is to filter the poisons from
circulation before they reach the cells. When an excess of poison is generated
in the body or is introduced from the outside as in vaccination, the lymph
glands become enlarged in an effort to collect and hold in abeyance, the
accumulation of poison. In the case of blood poisoning or a bite of a poison
insect a lump usually forms under the arm or in the groin, to meet the
emergency, but disappears again when the condition has healed. In the case of
the continued intake of poison such as tobacco, coffee, drugs, etc., the glands
most effected keep enlarging to accommodate the inflow of poison. A protective
coating of tissue is formed around the gland to protect the body from collected
poisons. It is this wonderful defense mechanism that the body provides against
the ignorance and willfulness of the individual, that the doctors attack as an
enemy. They call it a wild growth of tissue a cancer or
tumor. To cut or burn (as with radium, X-ray or surgery) this bulwark of
protection is to add insult to injury and allow the self-generated
poisons to flow unchecked through the body and do serious damage to the vital
organs, tissues and glands.
Dr. J. Morrison, former Professor of Chemistry and
Toxicology in the Medical Department of the National University at Washington,
D. C., had ample opportunity to observe the lymphatic involvement in cancer and
other diseases during his many years as a specialist in nervous and chronic
diseases. He was formerly a member of the Medical Council and Examiner in the
College of Physicians and Surgeons, (Ontaria, Canada). Regarding cancer he said:
"Cancer can only attack the organs and tissues moderately or
abundantly supplied by the lymphatic circulation . . . Therefore,
cancer is a disease of the lymphatic system "per Se" in the
same sense that tuberculosis is regarded as a disease of the lungs or
Speaking of causes he had this to say: "Two well-known causes of this fatal
malady are, (1) nicotine (tobacco) poisoning and (2)
vaccination, which is certainly the most prolific cause of both external and
internal cancer. . . Vaccine virus poisons the lymphatic system,
impairs its function and lays the foundation for internal cancer, for which
there has hitherto been no (successful medical) treatment or relief."
In Ontario, Canada, vaccination is very, very seldom performed and it is not
a mere coincidence that cancer is exceedingly rare there. On the other hand,
Massachusetts, in the United States, is one of the nine backward states that
defy the Constitution in forcing vaccination upon school children The cancer
rate is so high there, that there have been established more cancer hospitals
per population than in other states not under compulsory vaccination laws.
However the multiplying of medical hospitals has never solved
the cancer problems because their methods defy the laws of nature, ignore the
cause and purpose interfere with the orderly healing efforts of the body. As
long as continue to attempt to remove the cancer without of poison) so long will
they meet with failure or, at best, see the temporary appearance
of success. Some of the patients may survive the medical treatments and
have no return of the cancer, so far as outward symptoms are concerned, and yet
the interference with the protective efforts of the lymphatic system may release
the poisons into the blood and cause heart trouble or some other chronic
Some of the most observant doctors have recognized the hazards of cutting or
tampering with a growth on the body. Dr. Leo Loeb, of the
University of Pennsylvania, sometimes referred to as "the father of
cancer research in America", said that he learned early in his cancer
practice that "merely drawing a silken thread through a benign,
slowly-developing tumor would transform it into a malignant, rapidly developing
one," and that cutting with a knife had the same effect.
In spite of this knowledge among the best qualified authorities, the cutting
and burning is continued (with X-ray, radium and surgery) no doubt because it
is so profitable. The latest cancer propaganda urges the women to do some
self-diagnosing and hunt for lumps on the breasts. These lumps are nothing but
overworked lymphatic glands and since most people are toxic they will find some
that will feel tender. The medical advice is that they should rush to the
nearest hospital and have them operated on, but the advice of common sense and
sound reasoning is to leave them alone and do some internal housecleaning in the
form of fasting and proper diet.
The American Cancer Society, in a circular entitled FACTS AND FALLACIES ABOUT
CANCER says: "Cancer is not caused or cured by any known diet." Since most of
the statements in that leaflet are false, this one is not to be taken seriously
either. Abundant evidence to the contrary proves this claim to be without
foundation in fact.
Dr. Willard Parker, who for 30 years held the chair
of surgery at Columbia University Medical School was quoted as saying:
"Luxurious living, and particularly excess in animal food, increases the
waste products of the body, which if retained in the system have a tendency to
produce abnormal growths . . . Cancer is to a great degree one of the
final results of a long continued course of error in diet, and a strict
dietetic regimen is, therefore, a chief factor in the treatment preventive and
Another authoritative voice to be heard on this subject is that of
Dr. Horace Packard who in an address to the Homeopathic Surgical and
Gynecological Society of Chicago in 1915 said:
"Some critical examination of the habits of life of civilized, cancer-plagued
people, in comparison with the habits of primitive, cancer-free people, shows
that the main difference between them is in a dietary poor in mineral salts
among the cancer plagued and a dietary rich in mineral salts among the
cancer-free people, the most logical and rational course is to adopt this as a
keynote to cancer treatment."
Mineral salt, needless to say, does not mean common table
salt (sodium chloride) which is a poison irritant in itself, and excessive use
of which can cause death in a few hours. The foods high in mineral salts
are fresh vegetables, fruits, seeds, nuts, grains, sea plants, etc.
This partly accounts for the remarkable recoveries of cancer patients who had
been given up as hopeless by the medical doctors but who went on a simple fast
followed by a grape diet or carrot juice diet at home. Many reports have been
received of recovery from cancer of the stomach after a
systematic raw carrot juice and vegetable diet but the carrot juice had a
negative effect on cancer of the liver. Many cases of external and internal
cancer have been reported cured as a result of a fast followed by a 30-day diet
of fresh (unsprayed) grapes. Some used crushed grape leaf poultices on the
external cancer. Others have recovered on an extended fast including water but
no food or juices. One cancer patient did not respond to this or any other
treatment. She had been under medical care and had received the full course of
X-ray, radium and surgery, before she decided to go to a drugless sanitarium to
try the fasting and diet regimen. Even fasting cannot save the patient when cell
degeneration has advanced to the point where a large percentage of a vital organ
has been destroyed. However, even these hopeless cases experience an easy and
more painless death by fasting, this is far superior to morphine or other drugs.
Since fasting (the foundation of healing) is not taught in the schools, not
even medical schools, where healing should be taught, how shall we learn the
correct technique of this important healing measure. Few writers are
sufficiently experienced in fasting to be qualified to write on this subject,
therefore there are only a very few dependable books available that should be
used as guides. As wonderful as the fast is in eliminating
pain, and disease it should be preceded by a thorough study of the technique of
fasting in order to know what to do about the reactions or
healing crises that occur from time to time as the accumulation
of toxins are brought into circulation to be eliminated. These reactions may be
in the form of fainting, vomiting, diarrhea, coughing or some other violent
cleansing effort. Unless the patient understands the situation he may become
alarmed and call a doctor who would give drugs to suppress the discharges. All
drugs are poison and poisons at this critical time could cause death. The most
experienced fasting authority in this country is Dr. Herbert M. Shelton who has
fasted thousands of patients with almost miraculous results. Therefore, his book
on fasting, (Volume II of THE HYGIENIC SYSTEM) is the standard authority on the
subject. THERAPEUTIC FASTING by Arnold De Vries is another reliable book. This
author fasted 45 days to test this system after studying many of the best books
on the subject. There are several other books that cover the subject of the fast
but do not give sufficient data on breaking the fast and how to follow it up.
The right way to end or break the fast is as important as the fast itself and
can be dangerous if the wrong foods are eaten at this time. The appetite returns
after a complete fast and the patient may be tempted to eat some of the same
foods he considered nourishing before the fast, only to learn that his body
chemistry has normalized during the fast and many wrong foods will react as
poisons. For instance, one person broke the fast on two chocolate bars and soon
died as a result of it. Chocolate contains a poisonous drug (theobromine) which
is almost as harmful as the drugs in coffee. Another person broke the fast on
beef steak and fried potatoes and also died soon after. No one dies of a fast if
it is properly conducted and terminated. Most medical doctors think that fasting
is starving but the average person, even a sick person, can fast 40 days before
the starvation process even begins to take place. This point is usually
indicated by the pink, clean tongue, which has been gray and coated during the
fast. This is the cue to break the fast, as the cleansing is completed. If the
fast is continued after that point the body begins to use some of the tissues of
lesser importance in the starvation process. Fasting is never intended to extend
into the starving period, therefore fasting is not starving.
The newspapers quoted the doctors as saying that Bernarr MacFadden died of a
three-day fast. They also quoted his lawyer as saying the same thing. The
lawyer, Harry Gilgulin, was shocked when he read the statement he was supposed
to have made. Excerpts from a published letter (Hygienic Review, Jan 1956)
refuting this statement are as follows: "I could never have made such a
statement since I myself fasted some eight or nine times for a total of 175 days
and benefitted enormously from each of these fasts. . . Three of my fasts were
of 30 days duration and my wifes two fasts were of 34 and 30-day duration.. .
As a staunch supporter and enthusiastic advocate of hygienic living and an
ardent believer in fasting, it must be obvious to you that I could never have
made the statement attributed to me by the newspapers.
"What I did tell the reporters was that whenever Mr. MacFadden didnt feel
well, he would go on a short fast of several days duration . . . He had fasted
three days but broke the fast improperly by one small glass of fruit juice in
the morning and a meat meal with eight or more pals of butter in the evening and
that the improper breaking of the fast is not only dangerous but may lead to
dire consequences and even death."
Mr. MacFadden was taken to the hospital and what they did to him in the way
of shots and medicines was not stated, but he died soon after being taken to the
hospital. People do not die of three day fasts, especially athletic men like
MacFadden who are used to fasting. I talked to a man who had just completed a 21
day fast to restore his eyesight. He had been totally blind for 9 months. The
fast had cleansed his blood stream enough to enable the opaque film over his
eyes to dissolve and he was reading a newspaper when I met him. Soon after that
I talked with a man who had just completed a 60 day fast to cure a persistant
case of psoriasis. He was entirely healed after the fast on water no food or
juices and had so improved in health and strength that he was helping the
workmen dig a swimming pool at Dr. Bernard C. Jensens health sanitarium where
Dr. Shelton, in his Hygienic SYSTEM, Vol. 7, page 613 said:
"The effects of fasting are certain. There is nothing hit-or-miss about the
process. It works always in the same general direction."
This deviation into the subject of fasting and diet may seem a little off the
subject in a chapter on cancer yet it is of great importance in that it offers
the best solution to the cancer problem. In fact it is the basis of healing of
all diseases, with the possible exception of those which are products of the
imagination. Even in those cases a fast would help the mental and emotional
Since beginning this chapter on cancer my attention has been called to a
severe, seemingly hopeless case of cancer of seven years standing. The woman has
been a bed patient, unable to walk for many years. Recently she abandoned her
medical treatment and, as a last resort, decided to try what her doctors called
a "crackpot diet." This simple diet, so frowned upon by medical men, is nothing
but freshly made carrot juice, one or two quarts a day, a glass or so every
hour. After six days on this carrot juice she had the first peaceful nights
sleep, without pain, in seven years. At the end of two weeks she could walk,
with aid, to the car and go for a ride. Distressing reactions will no doubt, be
experienced within four more weeks but she will be prepared and understand what
to do. She has learned that there is hope of recovery from cancer and all
diseases when the simple laws of nature are understood and followed.
The medical profession boasts of having "three proved cures for
cancer" namely X-ray, radium and surgery, and yet the cancer-rate
continues to mount year after year. When people ask the reason for this, the
doctors favorite answer is: "The patients came too late early diagnosis would
have saved them." We might be able to believe this argument if it were not for
the fact that there never was a time in recorded history when there was
so much early diagnosis as right now in this country.
This mass diagnosis starts at the tender age of four and a half years when
the children start to kindergarten. The teachers are instructed to examine the
children every day for obvious symptoms of disease and report it to the school
nurse. The nurse examines them, herself, each week and reports her findings to
the doctors and the doctors and dentists come in for their check once or twice a
year to round up considerable business for themselves by frightening the parents
into needless treatments and operations for their children. The tonsils are the
most vulnerable targets of these "mixed up" doctors. Tonsils are very necessary
lymphatic glands of filtration that enlarge when the body is overloaded with
incompatible foods and drugs. Certain drugless doctors claim and have proved
that enlarged tonsils are 100 per cent curable under the right non-medical
The public is bombarded with cancer literature stressing the need for
early diagnosis. The people are even told to do their own diagnosis
hunt for lumps on the breast, growths, moles, sores, etc., that could be treated
as cancer. And yet, the doctors, themselves, dont even know how to detect
cancer in many cases. No wonder there is so much confusion, suffering and death
with so many blind leaders of the blind. On page 8 of the Doctors
Manual put out by the American Cancer Society we read:
"It is a well-known fact that a considerable number of malignant
tumorsare not recognized by the doctors themselves when the
patients present the early symptoms of the disease. The early diagnosis
of cancer is the one factor of greatest importance in the successful control of
the disease, but unfortunately the early symptoms of cancer are not
distinctive, and serve only to arouse suspicion of the presence of the
disease . . . In most situations, the dictum holds true that the more
certain the diagnosis the less the probability of cure."
So here we have the admission from the medical cancer field, that
they are not sure how to detect cancer until it is too advanced to be cured.
I have had patients tell me that when they went to the doctor with a painful
lump the doctor said it had not reached the cancer stage and they had nothing to
prevent its developing into cancer but to come back in a few months when it had
turned to cancer and they could use their standard "cures" (?) radium, X-ray,
During the frenzy of one of the Cancer Week scare campaigns,
someone asked the question, "Is there not some danger in developing "cancerphobia"
in the public mind by this scare-head publicity?"
Dr. John Cerster, chairman of the New York Committee of the Society for
Control of Cancer, replied that "it would be a good thing if it did; anything
that would scare the people into going to a physician for an examination would
The financial benefit to the doctors is apparent but the
benefit to the people is in reverse ratio to the amount of diagnosis and
treatment given. This is obvious since the cancer rate has quadrupled within the
past ten years.
Dr. G. Earl Thomas has charged that, "CANCER IS THE MOST
PROFITABLE DISEASE THAT THE MEMBERS OF THE A.M.A. HAVE."
One of the noted American cancer authorities, Dr. L. Duncan Bulkley,
senior surgeon of the New York Skin and Cancer Hospital, denounced the popular
medical claim that cancer is a "surgical disease" when he
"Cancer is not a surgical disease. Neither surgery not X-ray nor
radium have changed, in anyway whatever, the ultimate mortality of cancer in
forty years. It was 90 per cent in 1884. Now it is 92 percent".
For more details on the other side of the cancer question
see the book, IS CANCER CURABLE? published by Health Research.
"If syphilis were as infectious as most medical men believe it
to be, there would not be an uninfected person in the world."John Tilden, M.D.
Dr. M. Ricord, one of the most noted authorities on syphilitic affections, in
a lecture to medical men in Paris, said:
"At first I repelled the idea that syphilis could be transmitted by
The recurrence of facts appearing more and more confirmatory, I accepted the
possibility of this mode of transmission, I should say, with reserve, and even
with repugnance; but today, in the face of all these facts I hesitate no more to
proclaim their reality Who, pray, will run such a risk to escape smallpox?"
Dr Brundenell Carter, surgeon to St George s Hospital,
London, observed: "I think that a large proportion of the cases of apparently
inherited syphilis are in reality vaccinal; and that the syphilis in these cases
does not show itself until the age of from eight to ten years, by which time the
relation between cause (vaccination) and effect (syphilis) are lost sight of."
Dr. Ballard, one of the vaccine inspectors for the English
There can be no doubt that the vaccine virus and the syphilitic virus may
both be drawn at the same time, upon the same instrument, from one and the same
vesicle. The vesicle which is thus capable of furnishing both vaccine and
syphilitic virus may present, prior to being opened, all the normal and fully
developed characters of the true Jennerian vesicle as
ordinarily met with"
In his book entitled COMPULSORY VACCINATION, from his years world wide
research, Dr. J. M. Peebles (M.D., Ph.D.) gave an account of
seventeen school girls who developed syphilis as a result of vaccination at
Lebus, near Frankfort Yet the vaccinators report stated that the vaccinations
were from the regular, official calf-lymph "absolutely pure, glycerinated,
sterilized, all germs but the vaccine sporule, destroyed, hermetically sealed
Protesting the vaccination laws in various cities he says:
"Think of it, fathers and mothers, who would bring your daughters up to be
comely, chaste and pure, that your state and municipality should place you under
absolute compulsion to observe a rite to taint these maidens with the disease
against which civilization revolts."
Nichols adds, "At the present time little children are subject to the assault
(with a deadly weaponthe poisoned needle) , and a healthy, unvaccinated child,
in the eye of the law, is considered a nuisance and as dangerous at time of an
epidemic as a mad dog."
"Viewed in this light," Nichols continues, (in his BLUNDER IN POISONS page
41) the blunder, perhaps of greater gravity than that of transmission of
tuberculosis by vaccination, again becomes the crime; vaccination for mere
business interest would be (and is) a deliberate assault on the health of a
community, and the medical man committing the assault might well be termed
a perverter of common sense and an enemy of the human race ".
In THE VACCINATION SUPERSTITION (35) Dr. J. W. Hodge writes:
"Think of the unparalleled absurdity of deliberately infecting the organism
of a healthy child with the poisonous matter obtained from the sores of a sick
animal, under the pretense of protecting the victim of the ingrafted disease,
against the contagion of another disease.
"So-called successful vaccination is nothing less than the implanting into
the body, the virulent products of diseased animal tissue, with the effect of
inducing actual disease. The performance of such an operation, in the very
nature of the case, violates every principle of modern aseptic surgery, the
legitimate aim of which is to remove from the organism the products of disease
and never to introduce them."
Professor Scott Tebb,
in a treatise against compulsory vaccination stated:
"Once admitted that the risk of contracting venereal disease is real, and one
which no amount of care can guard against even if vaccination were a preventive
of smallpox, all ground for compulsion vanishes, for it then becomes a ground
for personal responsibility, as in any other operation or treatment involving
risk of life and health No surgeon would dream of administering chloroform or
per-forming the most trivial operation without first gaining the patients
consent, and therefore, no authority, whether medical or state, has the right to
override the patient s scruples Compulsory vaccination is now beginning to be
recognized, even by medical men, as a grievous and mischievous mistake,
and I have not the slightest doubt that the profession would gladly relinquish
it tomorrow, if their credit and prestige were not so deeply involved."
So enormous are the profits from vaccination that many efforts are made by
members of the medical profession to minimize the dangers of syphilis caused by
vaccination. One of these, Dr. Henry A. Martain, of Boston
wrote a paper denying the possibility of syphilitic infection from this cause.
The London Lancet (Medical Journal) in criticizing this paper said: "The notion
that animal lymph would be free from chances of syphlitic contamination is so
fallacious that we are surprised to see Dr. Martain reproduce it."
Professor Fournier said: "A real and serious danger incurred in vaccination
is that every (vaccinated) individual is destined to undergo, one or several
times in his life the danger of vaccinal syphilis. For myself alone, I have
knowledge of two actual epidemics of this disease (vaccinal syphilis)".
In the Encyclopedia Britannica (9th edition) under the heading "Smallpox
Cowpox," Dr. Charles Creighton says:
"The real affinity of cowpox is not to
smallpox, but to the great pox (syphilis). The
vaccinal roseola is not only very like the syphilitic roseola, but it means the
same sort of thing. The vaccinal ulcer of everyday practice is, to all intents
and purposes, a chancre (syphilitic ulcer)."
"The photographs, Fig. 1 and 2 show the marked similarity between the
smallpox vaccination roseola and the syphilis ulcer.
In his voluminous work on vaccination Crookshank tells us that "Auzias
Turenne, of France, was the first to point out that cowpox is analagous
to syphilis; but even the earliest opponents of vaccination regarded the disease
as "lues bovilla", (syphilis) and it had even been suggested
that the cow had derived the complaint from milkers who were affected
with syphilis. However, there is no more ground for believing in the
latter theory than there is for believing that cowpox is
produced by milkers suffering from smallpox.
It is the course which the malady runs which brings it so closely into
relations with syphilis .There appears to be very little doubt that
syphilis may be transmitted by vaccination; but many cases which are
attributed to syphilis are unquestionably the full effects of cowpox virus; and
nothing could more clearly point to the analogy between the two diseases than
the difficulty in diagnosing the exact nature of vaccinal accidents
"Again, if we study the effects of syphilis artificially inoculated on the
human subject, the appearance in some cases are strikingly similar to inoculated
horse-pox. Without entering into a prolonged discussion of this subject, I will
refer, as an example, to the progress in Dr. Ricords cases of syphilization. As
in inoculated horse-pox we have the stages of papule, vesicle, ulcer, scab and
scar; and no one can compare his plates with Jenners without being struck with
the similarity in their appearances. (See Fig. 2 and 3)
"The results of the artificial inoculation of syphilis were unknown to
Jenner, but if they had been he would scarcely have failed to have observed the
likeness between them. So striking indeed are the appearances, that it is
possible that. by judicious selection, a strain of syphilitic lymph might be
cultivated which would produce in time, all the physical characteristics of the
In THE VACCINATION SUPERSTITION by J. W. Hodge, M.D. we
"To the scientific physician, conclusive evidence of the real affinity of
cowpox is furnished at a glance, by the pathological diagnostic table of
M. R. Leverson, M.D., Ph. D. . .. which was read before the American
Association of Physicians and Surgeons at Indianapolis, (Jan. 1896) and has been
unquestioned by the profession.
"The table which I now present to you, is a condensed statement in paralleled
columns, of the primary and secondary symptoms of smallpox, cowpox and
syphilis, from the separate descriptions of the most renowned
authorities upon these several diseases. It shows an almost complete likeness
between the two latter and the total unlikeness of each to (natural, uninduced)
smallpox. Here we have some of the highest authorities who have produced the
clearest evidence showing that vaccinia (vaccination disease)
is modified syphilis. The chronic and protean manifestations
which, at times, follow vaccination must have impressed us all with their close
analogy to syphilitic lesions."
1 Eruption general, superficial.
2 Constitutional or general symptoms precede the eruption and are relieved on
3 Eruption first felt as a No. 8 bird shot beneath the skin, it then appears
as a papule; then a vesicle, becoming pustular about the 5th or 6th day, is from
one to three lines in length; but the pustules are of various kinds, irregular,
elevated, generally perforated by a hair, induration, if any, very slight, no
tendency to gnawing ulceration of the skin.
4 The fluid is contained in two chambers a superficial and a deep, which
communicate around the edges of the separating membrane.
5 The smallpox pustules leave no scar if properly treated.
6 The smallpox eruption does not affect the lymphatic system.
9 The smallpox epidemic seems to be taking its rise in filthy locations.
(also, when the body is contaminated with vaccines, drugs and incompatible foods
and impure water, etc.)
COWPOX (vaccination) Primary Lesion
1. Eruption local, deep, in corium of skin or subcutaneous tissue or in
2 Constitutional symptoms do not precede but follow the eruption in all cases.
3 Pustule (chancre) always the same, first a papule, then a vesicle, becoming
pustular about the 8th day, 7 to 10 lines in diameter, round, centrally
depressed, margin indurated and not perforated by a hair, has a cellular
membrane at floor, tendency to gnawing ulceration.
4. The fluid is contained in a single chamber, reticulated, is non-volatile, and
the infection is communicated only by immediate contact with an abraded surface.
5 The cowpox leaves a foveated scar.
6 The cowpox poison permeates the lymphatic channels and ganglia, causing
inflammation, buboes, and abscesses.
7 Not infectious.
9 Cowpox is independent of time and place; communicated only by direct
SYPHILIS or Greatpox
1 Eruption local, deep, in the corium of skin or subcutaneous tissue, or in
the mucous membrane.
2 Constitutional symptoms do not precede but follow the eruption in all cases.
3 Pustule always the same, first a papule rapidly becoming pustular without
perceptibly passing through a vesicular stage, 7 to 10 lines in diameter,
scooped out, deep funnel-shaped with sloping often elevated, .not perforated by
a hair, has a fungoid membrane at floor, tendency to a gnawing ulceration.
4 Absolutely the same as the cowpox.
5 Similar to the scar of cowpox.
6 Absolutely the same as the cowpox. 7 Not infectious.
9 Absolutely the same as cowpox.
"The smallpox patient, upon recovery, is free from the disease even if he is
marked by scars. Smallpox will not beget cowpox or syphilis.
"On the contrary, there are various subsequent manifestations in vaccination,
or cowpox, which are remarkably like those that appear in what are known as
secondary and tertiary periods of syphilis.
"We have tabulated in parallel columns some of the many manifestations that
appear in both these diseases, and a glance will reveal their striking
MANIFESTATIONS OF AFTER-EFFECTS OF
Nodes in the head
Dentition delayed in children, with pro-duction of the
so-called syphilitic teeth
Eczema of all kinds
Ready fracture and difficult healing of bones, also probably
canes in some cases.
Caries of bone (cavities)
Mucous patches on tonsils, tongue and lips tending to
Smallpox, to a large extent, went out when improved sanitation came in,
except in countries where vaccination is compulsory. There the smallpox
epidemics continue to ravage the population at frequent intervals.
Un-refutable, scientific evidence proves that smallpox and cowpox are not the
same disease, therefore, cowpox vaccination cannot introduce anti-bodies into
the system that fight smallpox, as is claimed by the medical doctors.
As stated before, smallpox, (as well as disease in general,) is an enforced
cleansing effort of the body. If the patients get eruptive diseases, like
smallpox, after vaccination it merely indicates that they have internal vitality
enough to throw off some of the excess poison in this violent way. Usually,
however, the vaccine poison so lowers the resistance of the body that it cannot
rally enough reserves for a defensive action in the form of an eruptive disease.
Therefore, the poisons are retained where they corrode and destroy the tissues
of the heart, kidneys, lungs and other vital organs. This suppression of
symptoms and masking of one disease with another this delayed reaction in
disease causation is what the medical profession calls the conquering of
disease by antibiotics.
Dr. Chauven, in an address before the French Academy of medicine, October,
1891, reviewed the results of his years of detailed and carefully tested
experiments. In the face of undeniable facts he was forced to the conclusion
(1) "Vaccine virus never gives smallpox to anyone." (Although it produces
many diseases, some of which resemble smallpox and are diagnosed as smallpox and
are more damaging than smallpox.)
(2) "Vaccinia (disease produced by vaccination) is not even attenuated
"Vaccinia is, in all probability, a modified form of syphilis, as has been
clearly pointed out by Doctors Charles Creighton and E. M. Crookshank, Professor
of Pathology and Bacteriology in Kings College, London, two of the highest
authorities on these subjects."
"Are we the issue of an inferior stock, or are we inferior
representatives of men who were physically and culturally our superiors?"From
Genesis and Control of Disease Weger
Even now, in what is sometimes called the enlightened age, we still hear some
people, (not so enlightened) claim or repeat what they have been taught to say,
that "vaccination has reduced smallpox and certain other diseases, and has been
a blessing to mankind." Those who make this claim have not bothered to consult
authentic records or become acquainted with the most elementary facts on the
When traced down, these statements are found to originate from the fabricated
propaganda of those who profit from the sale of serums and drugs. Unfortunately
many of these people are in places of authority where they influence the
thinking of students, writers, public officials, teachers and others who mold
the thinking of the masses. These errors in theory and practice have steadily
reduced our nations health to a state of crisis in which 90 per cent of the
people are either critically ill or below par, physically or mentally.
In addition to the vaccination diseases treated separately in other chapters,
there are a number of other serious diseases that have been traced directly to
vaccination. Some of the most noticeably persistent of these will be treated in
Dr. D. Killick Millard, Medical Officer of Health, (Leicester, England) in
reporting on this subject stated (in his book THE VACCINATION QUESTION):
"It cannot be denied that vaccination causes, in the aggregate, very
considerable injury to health, most of it only temporary (?) but some permanent.
It is true that the deaths certified as due to vaccination . . . have
several times outnumbered those from smallpox, while if we have regard
for the amount of ill-health caused by the two diseases . . . it looks as if
vaccinia were becoming, so far as the community is concerned, the more serious
disease of the two."
The Report of the Surgeon General of the Army, (1919) vol.
I, page 37, gives the number of admissions to hospitals during the year 1918, on
account of vaccinia (vaccination disease) as 10,830.
The Report of the Surgeon General of the Army, (1918) gives
me the number of admissions to hospitals during the year 1917, on account of
vaccinia and vaccinal-typhoid combined as 19,608.
Here we find that in only two years of the war and in only one army there
were over 30,000 soldiers hospitalized by vaccination. This
does not take into consideration the thousands who were seriously ill but not
critical enough to be hospitalized, nor the cases of chronic disease that
developed later as a result of the cumulative effects of poisons from vaccines
Herbert Spencer, in his "History of Epidemics in
Great Britain" voiced the sentiments of the best authorities when he
"Vaccination, in subduing one disease only increases others."
Charles M. Higgins made an extensive and thorough world-wide investigation
and study of the vaccination question and reported most of the pertinent data in
his book "The Horrors of Vaccination Exposed." In his effort to bring the
dangers of vaccination to the attention of the people he, for several years,
carried a paid advertisement in one of the large New York dailies,
challenging the New York City and State Health Departments to
open their books, and he "would undertake to prove from their
own records that THERE HAD BEEN MORE DEATHS FROM VACCINATION THAN FROM
SMALLPOX IN NEW YORK, EVERY YEAR FOR THE PAST 15 YEARS."
His challenge was never accepted. The facts were not reported to the people
and the killing of innocent children has continued without interruption, down
through the years.
In his book, "Vaccination a Disastrous Delusion" (p. 13)
Ernest McCormick, discussed the findings of the researcher, Sir James Paget as
"In the same cause he finds a probable explanation for the defective
eyesight and dentition which have become so prevalent,
giving examples to show that, owing to the teeth and sense organs arising out of
the dermal layer in the embryo, skin diseases, of which vaccination is
one, are likely to produce abnormalities in all of these. According to
the LANCET (British Medical Journal 1904) 85 per cent of school children have
defective teeth and 3,000 servicemen (all vaccinated) were returned from South
Africa, from that cause alone, while the Navy is still worse in that respect.
Sir William Osler (M.D.), in his PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF
MEDICINE, in discussing the various characteristics of vaccinia
"About the end of the first week: Generalized vaccina;
impetigo; vaccinal ulceration; glandular abscess; septic infections; gangrene."
Dr. Osler is one of the most completely accepted and respected authorities on
medicine in the world. He was Regius Professor of Medicine at Oxford University
and Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians (London), and Honorary Professor
of Medicine at Johns Hopkins University, (U.S.). He knew the financial
importance of vaccination (to the medical profession) and he knew the
professional hazards of making any unfavorable statements about vaccination, yet
he publicly admitted that some of the most loathsome and painful diseases
including leprosy and syphilis were caused by vaccination.
Ricardo Corfield, of Lowell Ave., Providence, Rhode Island, was vaccinated at
the age of 5 years and 4 months in order to secure admission to school. His arm
swelled and the ulcer enlarged until pieces of decayed flesh dropped off leaving
the bone exposed. On September 5th the tendons under the right knee became so
enlarged and painful that the child cried out in agony. An incision was made and
more than a quart of putrid, brown matter exuded. The shin bone rotted off."
(from "Victims of State Poisoning", published by Liberator Pub. Co.,
"The Department of Agriculture, in its efforts to suppress the foot-and-mouth
disease traced the disease to the vaccine virus imported into the United States
by our manufacturing chemists and sold to our people. The investigation revealed
that the virus, used upon calves in the District of Columbia, communicated the
foot-and mouth disease to them." (From the Declaration by the late Senator
Dolliver, of Iowa, in an address to the United States Senate, February 25,
From the FARMERS BULLETIN, (page 15) April 22, 1915, published by the U.S.
Department of Agriculture, we have the following statement:
"The foot-and-mouth disease is primarily a disease of
cattle; secondarily and casually, a disease of man. . . It is
probable that the infection may be communicated to man if the virus directly
enters the blood through wounds of any kind (including vaccination) . . . The
symptoms in man resemble those observed in animals."
Dr. William Hitchman, Consulting Surgeon to the Cancer Hospital of
Leeds and formerly public vaccinator to the City of Liverpool,
expressly stated that, Syphi1is, abdominal phthisis, scrofula, cancer,
erysipelas, and almost all diseases of the skin, have been either
conveyed, or intensified by vaccination."
Dr. Peebles, (world renowned researcher and authority on
vaccination) stated in his book on Compulsory Vaccination:
"We shall never stamp out smallpox, cancer, consumption, or leprosy,
so long as we continue to STAMP THEM IN through the idiotic and
vicious practice of vaccination. The Germans endeavored to stamp out
syphilis by stamping it in with syphilized vaccine. They have
abandoned that practice now and in time they will abandon vaccination
In the Encyclopedia Britannica (9th edition), under the
title of VACCINATION, by Dr. Charles Chreighton, we find some carefully
authenticated statistics showing that vaccination has caused a great
many cases of syphilis, cancer, tumors, scrofula, eczema, tuberculosis,
In his VACCINE AND SERUM EVILS (page 6) Dr. Herbert M. Shelton discusses some
of the complications that often accompany or follow vaccination. He writes:
"Abscess, sloughing, cellulitis, erysipelas,
syphilis, leprosy, tuberculosis, tetanus(lock jaw),
actinomycosis (big jaw), general septic infection, urticarial
eruptions, paralysis, meningitis, sleeping sickness, etc., may follow
vaccination . . . In some instances the abcess that may form,
refuses to heal. I saw one case of this kind where the abscess
continued to discharge pus after 14 years."
From the high ranking medical authority Dr. William Osler we have this
"Syphilis has undoubtedly been transmitted by vaccination."
Under the topic heading, INFLUENCE OF VACCINATION UPON OTHER DISEASES, Dr.
"A quiescent malady may be lighted into activity by vaccination. This happens
with congenital syphilis and occasionally with tuberculosis . . . At the height
of the vaccination, convulsions may occur and be followed by hemiplegia
(paralysis of one side of the body)."
Our recent "vaccination" wars have presented a dismal picture of paralysis
among the soldiers with large hospital wards filled with paraplegics (paralysis
of both sides) and hemiplegics (paralysis of one side.) Thus we see that the
doctors know and the government knows what vaccination is doing to our service
men and civilians. Why have they turned their "blind side" to it and allowed it
Not only do vaccine poisons cause some of the strange and terrible diseases
that baffle the doctors, but these same poisons also increase the incidence of
the common "zymotic" diseases such as measles, chicken-pox,
mumps, scarlet fever, etc., which are usually referred to as "contagious
diseases." These diseases are not contagious but are merely
cleansing measures of the body in its effort to eliminate some of the excess
poison and waste matter.
Wherever an honest survey is made after a vaccination campaign it is noticed
that there is always a marked increase in disease. Thomas Morgan, in his
"Medical Delusions" reports a survey that was made of the city of Youngstown,
Ohio, after a general vaccination order of school children. "It was found that
nearly all the cases of scarlet fever, measles and diphtheria had been recently
What is true of this city is true everywhere, and any close observer can
satisfy himself in this direction."
After reading this I decided to "satisfy myself in this direction" as
suggested; so I obtained a LOS ANGELES COUNTY HEALTH INDEX, which gives the
weekly record of diseases for the entire year (this was 1954).
I was amazed to find that the common diseases mentioned by Morgan, more than
doubled after the annual June vaccination campaign. The figures are given below
and will speak for themselves.
In numerous reports we find incontestable proof from government records and
hospital data, etc., that smallpox increased in the countries having compulsory
vaccination. It is only natural that it should do so because the admitted
purpose of vaccination is to engraft a mild form of smallpox into the patient.
Because there is no test and no control that can assure a mild
case, we find that the induced disease is often more severe
than natural smallpox, and frequently terminates in death.
In disregard to the known facts and the statements of the worlds greatest
medical authorities on the subject, the Los Angeles (city and county) health
departments claim that their annual vaccination campaigns have absolutely wiped
out smallpox in the county. In this large population of 4,000,000 people (Los
Angeles county) with its thousands of people infected with disease in each
vaccination drive, and the increase of all other diseases after
each of these blood 5 poisoning sprees, the record department omits from the
records all the smallpox cases and issues the report that
"there has not been one case of smallpox in the county for the past ten
years." In the complete record of 48 diseases reported, jsmallpox was
the only one on the list that showed no report of cases.
When a "cover-up" job is over-done it makes people
suspicious so I went to the County Hospital to check more closely. They
willingly gave me the information I asked for on all other diseases except
smallpox. The record department flatly refused to let me see those records or
even know if these were any cases at that time in the hospital.
Disgusted, but not discouraged, I walked across the grounds toward the
contagion ward and met a nurse coming from there. I walked with
her and chatted a bit then asked her if there were any cases of smallpox in her
department. She said, "Yes". I asked how many there were and she said, "I
havent any idea." I said, "I take it from that, that there are more than a half
a dozen?" She said, "Oh, yes I havent been assigned the job of counting them
so I really dont know." I said, "Are you sure they are smallpox and not
just chickenpox" She said, "Theyre smallpox. We keep them separate
from the chickenpox."
I rushed back to the record department and told them what I had learned and
demanded to see the records that should be public property in a tax supported
public institution. The girl looked worried and went into the inner office and
called someone on the phone. When she came back she said that the smallpox
report was not available as it was being worked on. So there we
have the answer.
Whenever we see a statement about smallpox being wiped out by vaccination, we
can be quite sure that the cases have been concealed in the "closed" contagion
ward and the records have been worked on. Other investigations
have shown that in this official scrambling of figures, the mild cases of
smallpox are placed on the list of such diseases as chickenpox and measles,
while the serious cases are recorded as syphilis, scrofula or something else
George Bernard Shaw said, "During the last considerable
epidemic at the turn of the century, I was a member of the Health Committee of
London Borough Council, and I learned how the credit of vaccination is kept up
statistically by diagnosing all the re-vaccinated cases (of smallpox) as
pustular eczema, varioloid or what not except smallpox."
In the American Sector of Occupied Germany, when the American medico-drug
combine moved in for a sweeping vaccination campaign, the Germans begged to be
spared, on the ground that they no longer had the hospitals, help, medicines or
equipment that would be required to take care of the outbreak of disease that
would and had always followed vaccination campaigns. Germany had been under
compulsory vaccination in previous years and her doctors had made lush profits
from the crop of diseases induced by each vaccination drive. When it was seen
that the profits were to be made by the foreign invaders
(America), they admitted the uselessness of the practice, as well as the
physical and financial disadvantages to their people.
"Citing an admission by Sir James Paget that vaccination probably effects a
permanent change in the components of the body, he inquires whether it is likely
that the constitution can be altered in relation to one invading agent (like
vaccine serum from diseased animal tissue or pus or from drugs) and remain
unchanged in regard to all other invading agents. There is every reason . . . to
believe the contrary, and to think that a system which has taken up a morbific
principle, even though it should acquire thereby, immunity from cognate disease,
must have its power of resistance to perturbing influences in general,
Mr. Spencer (Herbert) finds evidence of this general relative debility in the
greatly increased severity and enlarged incidence of many diseases
such as measles, chickenpox, and influenza, which, before vaccination
became general, were of relatively rare occurrence and trifling in
their effect. By a comparison of the infant mortality returns in quinquennial
(five year) periods before and since compulsory vaccination, he finds that the
mortality from 8 specified diseases, either directly communicable or exacerbated
(aggravated) by vaccination, increased from 20,524 to 41,353 per million births
per annum." (From Vaccination a Disastrous Delusion, by McCormick - page 13.)
The backbone of the vaccine argument is that it has been made safe
modified by passing the virus through a cow and later all the
harmful organisms are supposed to have been killed in the processing and
glycerinizing, except a few select ones that are earmarked to produce the
anti-bodies in the human organism.
The absurdity of this is too apparent for any serious argument. (See chapter
on HOW SERUMS ARE MADE Book II) It has been scientifically proved and tested
that what is promised for vaccine virus is not so. Dr. Cameron, summed this up
in his report before the Lyons Commission when he stated:
"THE CHARACTER OF THE VIRUS CANNOT BE CHANGED BY PASSING IT THROUGH THE COW,
ANYMORE THAN BY STUNTING AN OAK IT CAN BE CONVERTED INTO A GOOSEBERRY BUSH."
If the vaccine virus had been modified or made safe
by passing it through the body of an animal and then processing it, there would
not be the ever-increasing list of deaths and disasters from vaccination. A few
of the many examples of this will be given in the following pages of this
chapter. Most of the cases are selected from the Rowton survey
of Denver and Colorado Springs, Colorado. (The addresses are omitted, but on
Earl Richardson, (Colorado Springs) was vaccinated by the
local doctor when six years of age. Up to that time he was strong and healthy,
but 9 days after the vaccination he developed an illness accompanied by
extreme nervousness that the doctor diagnosed as St. Vitus
Dance. He was given an examination and found the heart and other organs
to be sound and unaffected. A few days later complications set in and the doctor
was called again. On examination he found that the boy had developed a
valvular heart condition. The mother took him to Kentucky to three
heart specialists who all declared that it was due to infection. One doctor said
the ailment was probably due to vaccination, as he had seen some other cases of
valvular heart trouble develop after vaccination. Four years later, when Mr.
Rowton had his last interview with this family, the child was still too ill to
attend school. His mother said he often had to sleep sitting up in bed on
account of the heart condition.
Its a strange law that compels children to be vaccinated in order to
attend school and then disables them so they cannot attend anything.
According to NEWSWEEK, April 25, 1955, heart trouble, our
number one killer, takes 794,000 victims each year and 10
million Americans suffer from it.
Less than a third of the deaths were caused by heart trouble 20 years ago.
"Today, it causes more than one death out of every two.
"The cost is staggering: Industry loses the work of 653,000
men annually because of heart disease disabilities; annual compensation and
pensions to veterans total $168,000,000."
Many of these same industries that are pressed with heavy disability costs
are the ones that require compulsory vaccination of their employees.
The heart is the strongest muscle in the body and it takes
an extreme amount of poison or abuse to impair its functioning. Tobacco, liquor,
drugs, cola drinks, poison preservatives in foods and poison spray on farm
produce, in addition to the incompatible, devitalized foods are some of the
other poisons that corrode the tissues of the heart as well as every cell in the
body. Arteriosclerosis, which accompanies about half of the heart deaths,
is also a disease which is induced by body poisoning, over-eating of
incompatible, devitalized foods and depleting habits.
TUBERCULOSIS FROM VACCINATION
Lena Long, (Denver) was vaccinated in October, 1922, in order to attend
school. In four days her arm began to fester and she developed a high fever. She
was extremely nervous and confined to her bed for about a week. A little later
she developed pneumonia with symptoms of tuberculosis. The doctor checked the
family records to try to find tuberculosis in the family or ancestory but none
was found. The last report from the mother, Mrs. S. A. Long, was that Lena was
still unable to attend school and was suffering from tuberculosis. Mr. Long
(Lenas father) was vaccinated the same year, in December, after which 12 boils
developed on his neck. This gave him a great deal of trouble. He had never bad a
boil before that time.
SCARLET FEVER FROM VACCINATION
Mrs. Donnelly, (Denver) was successfully vaccinated for smallpox on December
21, 1922. A few hours after the injection she began to experience severe
reactions which developed into scarlet fever in such a serious form that she was
rushed to the hospital where she hovered between life and death for several
KIDNEY TROUBLE FROM VACCINATION
Katie Blessant, (Denver) was given toxin-anti-toxin for diphtheria. In a
short time she lost her voice and soon after that she developed kidney trouble
and stomach trouble which she had never been bothered with before.
BRIGHTS DISEASE FROM VACCINATION
Earl Rohsbecker, (Denver) was vaccinated for smallpox after which he
developed Brights disease (an advanced form of degeneration of the kidneys).
The doctors do not hold out much hope for his recovery.
PARALYSIS FROM VACCINATION
Raymond Nelson (Denver) was given diphtheria toxin-anti-toxin after which he
developed paralysis. His son was given the antitoxin also, and died of it.
Mrs. Black (Colorado Springs) was vaccinated for smallpox and soon developed
spinal meningitis. The case was so severe that the attending physician had to
call in assistance from Denver.
David, son of Mr. and Mrs. C. Robinson, was vaccinated on November 6, 1921.
By the family physician, in compliance with the school requirement. After three
days his arm festered and was inflamed. Then for several weeks the vaccination
seemed to be healing but continued to be sore and inflamed. In February the
glands in his neck began to swell and some lumps formed under each arm. Some of
the lumps decreased in size but all were painful so the doctor lanced one of the
larger ones. It never did heal properly and began to discharge pus a little
later. At the time of the last report (March, 1921) it had not healed and the
child was still in bed and unable to walk. It is not likely that he will be able
to attend school for a long time.
A Mothers Report (name withheld by request)
"I had my daughter vaccinated on the 21st of December, 1921. In less than a
week her arm started to swell, become inflamed, and discharged pus at the site
of the vaccination. A lump developed under the arm and she was seriously ill for
four months. I had her treated for over a year with X-ray and now her arm is
blistered with X-ray burns in addition to the original ailment.
SMALLPOX FROM VACCINATION
Mrs. Jessie Wuns (Colorado Springs) was vaccinated for smallpox and a few
days later she developed a severe case of smallpox which lasted seven weeks.
DROPSY FROM VACCINATION
Mrs. Anna Heller (Colorado Springs) developed sores on her arm, neck and leg
after her vaccination. Although many years have passed, it still bothers her.
Her two daughters were also vaccinated and both of them developed vaccinia
and almost died from it. Her son, almost died from the vaccination itself; then
he developed smallpox 30 days later. It left him with dropsy from which he has
WHO CAN ANSWER THIS?
George Ogden and family reported the following:
"We all had smallpox before coming to Colorado Springs but Dr. Gillett
insists on our being vaccinated every year anyway."
QUESTION: If a case of smallpox cannot immunize against another attack of
smallpox how can a vaccination be expected to do more than that when the
vaccination, at best, is claimed to produce only a mild form of the disease.
Now, if there is anything at all to the vaccination theory then a case of
smallpox should not only immunize against smallpox but should, also, protect
against the effects of vaccination and re-vaccination. If it does not do this
then the vaccination theory disproves itself it has absolutely no sound reason
for being. Since vaccination has proved itself to be useless and hazardous why
does Dr. Gillett (as well as other vaccinating doctors) insist on vaccinating?
Is there any reason except for money, at the cost of human
INSANITY FROM VACCINATION
NEWSWEEK for April 25, 1955 says that Mental Illness is
rated by many experts as the biggest health problem of the day.
More than half of the U. S. hospital beds are occupied by mental patients. Their
care costs the taxpayers more than a billion dollars a year.
Another report states that there are 10,000,000 people in U. S. with mental
On a troopship returning from the Australian sector after the war, it was
reported that 250 of the 400 men aboard, were insane. Some of the excuses the
doctors offered for this shocking development was that it was caused by the heat
of the jungles and the rigors of war. However, the citizens of
unvaccinated Australia didnt go insane in the same
heat and the enemy didnt go insane with the same rigors of war and in
the same climate. It has been hinted that the men were poisoned almost
to death with vaccine serums and drugs. The normal brain cells are richly
supplied with calcium and other alkaline elements When poisons are introduced
into the system the calcium is leeched out of the soft tissues first and then
the bones, in order to neutralize the poisons. This greatly impairs or destroys
the functioning of the brain, nerves, muscles, and eyes, etc.
S Vandecarr, D C, m an article titled, "WHO IS INSANE" said:
"There is a cry being raised concerning the lack of sufficient institutions
to adequately care for the mental cases needing commitment to them. Lunacy is
terribly on the increase. Particularly do ex-service men and women need such
care. Many thousands of these men and women were in perfect health when inducted
into the armed forces. They were then given all the "shots" devised by the
allopathic laboratories and used without question by the allopathic physicians
in the medical corps. Histories of hundreds of cases were "written up" by
physicians who followed up the results of immunization in the service. It showed
plainly that the inoculations and vaccinations were responsible for the
tremendous number of men and women who, soon after being inoculated,
had to be discharged as psycho-neurotics. Thousands of these are now filling the
mental institutions and few of them will ever again be restored to normal.
"One of the effects of the poisons injected into the blood
to "prevent" (?) disease is that it weakens the nervous system
and gradually breaks down the nerve centers in the brain. The end result
of this is insanity...
"Within a day or so after being admitted to the mental institution, the
patient is taken to the room set aside for the purpose and given three or more
"shots." It matters not whether they have been recently vaccinated or not, they
are again given a smallpox vaccination, then whatever serums they happen to have
on hand. Thereafter, each week the patients are lined up and given more shots.
What for? Who knows? Even those who give them do not apparently know. In one
mental institution I know of, every Thursday is called "needle day" because on
that day all patients are given at least three injections. They all get the same
dose whether they want it or not. The result is, they lose weight and become
sick. Their mental condition becomes worse with each inoculation and soon they
are beyond help. Mild cases become violent and then the attendants maltreat
"After seeing the medical practitioners at work it makes one wonder whether
it is the patient or the doctor who is insane.
"Knowledge is the antidote of fear,
Knowledge, Use and Reason, with its aids."
Ignorance spiked with greed has put a death machine (vaccination) into the
hands of doctors, and ignorance and fear have driven people into its lethal
power. Emerson was right when he said that the right use of reason and knowledge
could free mankind from fear. It is certainly true that a little knowledge
applied in the right places would wake people out of their hypnotic stupor of
believing that the popularized poison could unpoison them and
make them well again.
It is the purpose of this chapter, in particular, as well as the entire book,
to present the actual photographs and case histories of victims of vaccination,
along with enough authoritative data to give some concrete reasons for
abolishing vaccination. Its deadly effects have been proved and its uselessness
has been admitted by the most experienced authorities in the field.
According to the figures of the Office of Vital Statistics at Washington, D.
C., there were "33 deaths from vaccination in the three years,
1949, 1950, 1951 ..
Post-Vaccinal Encephalitis 22; Generalized Vaccinia, 2; other complications,
9." During this same 3-year period there were only 4 deaths from smallpox. If
vaccination kills people at the rate of 33 to every 4 protected (?) the risk is
greater than any possible advantage. (It was not stated how many of the
smallpox cases had been vaccinated also.)
In the years 1941 to 1948 there were (In U.S.) 107 deaths from "sequaelae of
preventive immunization, inoculation or vaccination". During this time there
were only 78 deaths from smallpox.
In the American Journal of Diseases of Children, Dr. Greenberg discussed the
results of the 1947 smallpox scare in New York. Under the heading of
Complications of Vaccination" he admitted that 45 cases of post vaccinal
encephalitis (inflammation of the brain and spinal cord) had been observed and
that 4 deaths had occurred up to that time. Two of the patients who survived
death developed hemiparesis and one had optic neuritis. Forty-two other patients
had generalized vaccinia of which two died and another died of ulceration of the
So, seven died of this vaccination epidemic while only one died of smallpox
and that case was proved, later, not to be smallpox at all. It was just a case
of poison ivy used to stage a multi-million dollar vaccination drive.
In England the Ministry of Healths report on The State of the Public Health
During Six Years of War," under the heading "Post-Vaccinal Encephalitis" stated:
"In the six years 60 cases of this complication of vaccinia have been
recorded by the Ministry. There were 31 deaths; a figure of 50 percent, may be
taken as the fatality rate of this grave complication."
During this same period of six years there were only 13 deaths from smallpox
in all of England and Wales. The report did not state how many of these cases of
smallpox were induced by vaccination.
Neville Chamberlain M.D. was forced to admit, in the House of Commons, that
in the short period of one month (June 1 to June 30) 11 death certificates had
been given in which the words "vaccination" or "vaccinia" appeared as the cause
of death, and that on six of these certificates some form of nervous disease was
entered. . . He also admitted that there were 10 other cases in which death
followed closely after vaccination.
An editorial in JOHN BULL (London) continues this discussion as follows:
"Almost the next day he (Chamberlain) had to admit that one child in Norfolk
died of post-vaccinal-encephalitis (sleeping sickness) after vaccination and
that three other similar cases in the same district were suffering from the same
disease following vaccination.
"We do not have to be medical experts to appreciate the gravity of this
startling report, which for once in a lifetime has completely broken through the
conspiracy of silence with which medical men usually surround their operations.
"This is not particularly a question of medicine. It is a question of
national health-SURVIVAL. It is not sanity to continue to inject poison and
disease into healthy children, and we have no hesitation whatever in asserting
that the whole
business of vaccination should be suspended forthwith.
"Our opinion is that it would be both cheaper and more affective to remove
vaccination than to waste time and money in experiments toward removal of the
dread consequences of vaccination."
ENCYCLOPEDIA REPORTS DISEASES CAUSED BY VACCINATION
The Encyclopedia Britannica (9th edition) records results of a canvass of
cities after a general vaccination order for school children. It was found that
nearly all the cases of scarlet fever, measles and diphtheria
had been recently vaccinated. Two vaccinated boys developed black
diphtheria and died. What is true of this survey is true of other
cities where vaccination is stressed.
WHAT VACCINATION DOES
A recognized authority summed up this subject by saying:
"Vaccination induces an acute and specific disease (resembling smallpox) and
also aggravates existent latent diseases. The absorption of the vaccine virus
into the circulation excites the virus already in the system, and nature rebels,
as it were, and makes an effort to throw the poison out of the body. When there
is sufficient vitality, it will be successful. But when there is a lack of
vitality, or a low state of health, there is little or no external manifestation
in the shape of blisters, pustules, or eruptions. In this case, the poison sinks
in, or is absorbed, and remains in the body, and later develops into some
organic disease, generally of the respiratory organs.
"Nearly all of those on whom Jenner performed his earlier
experiments, including his own son, died of consumption (a disease of the
"There are possibly millions, both children and adults, who are compelled to
endure a living death from the effects of vaccination, in the form of syphilis,
scrofula, cancer, tumors, skin diseases, etc."
I personally have seen a number of people lingering on for years in a state
of living death as a result of vaccination.
In his "Vaccination Delusions", Thomas Morgan reports:
"During the past five months, we have collected from the newspapers over five
hundred authenticated cases of injury and death from vaccination. We present a
few cases to show how vaccination protects (?) for it is
evident that when vaccination kills the patient, he is forever immune
to smallpox, protected by the immunizing potency of death. These have died from
blood-poisoning, erysipelas, lockjaw, convulsions, etc., after vaccination."
(The names, ages, dates, and locality (town) are given on page 35 of "Medical
THE NEW YORK SUN, March 20, 1895 stated:
"John Morrissey, 1979 Third Ave., New York, lost his two children; both died
from convulsions induced by vaccination. Dr. Sharp, who
attended them, thinks that vaccination may have been the cause of the childrens
HERALD, Northampton, Mass., May 25, 1895:
"Webster N. Kinney, 8 year old son of Charles Kinney, of Westfield, was
vaccinated and died from the direct effect of vaccination, which resulted in
blood-poisoning. The occurrence caused quite a stir. Parents see that
there is greater danger from poisoning the human system with vaccine virus than
from smallpox." (emphasis supplied)
PRESS SPECIAL, Savannah, Georgia, Febr. 3, 1898:
"Wm. M. Lee, member of the St. Louis School Board, died from vaccination.
Alma Olivia Piehn, daughter of L. H. Piehn, president of the Anti-Vaccination
Society of America, died May 13, 1894, killed by compulsory vaccination. Albert
F. Turner died from blood-poisoning, as the result of vaccination."
THE BOSTON HERALD gives names and addresses of 47 soldiers
killed by vaccination in just one month of army life, from the official reports
from Camp Merrit, San Francisco, Camp Muintauk and troops stationed at Manila
for the month of January, 1899. These soldiers had the usual course of vaccine
serums for the prevention of smallpox, diphtheria, typhoid, etc.
The diseases they died from within 30 days of the
vaccinations were, smallpox, diphtheria, typhoid, lockjaw, black
smallpox, blood-poisoning, and cirrhosis of the liver.
General Leonard Wood told the Senate Committee on Military
Affairs that "half his present forces were not fit for effective service."
In the Cuban army 60 per cent of the men were frequently disabled, because of
diseases other than battle wounds.
In a published article in LIFE magazine, April 17, 1950, General Eisenhower,
in discussing the poor conditioning of our fighting forces, said:
I remember one time in Africa when we had only four divisions in the field,
and I was desperate for men, I found we had 6,000 men in hospitals in Africa
unavailable for combat and not one of them had suffered a wound."
All these men were in prime condition when they went to war. Forty-seven per
cent of our young men were unfit for service and were rejected. This was an "all
time high" record of unfitness, indicating the decadent trend of our
nations health. But the most perfect men were inducted and sent to the Army
camps to be shot full of vaccine poisons and other drugs. After this drastic
course of malpractice thousands of boys were invalided home as physical and
mental wrecks before they even left American soil. Others were sent to the
battlefield where they collapsed and had to be hospitalized.
During the Second World War I heard that seven men had dropped dead on the
floor of the vaccinators office at Birmingham after being vaccinated. I wrote
to the government for verification and learned from the printed official
government statement that in just the first six months of the war, there were
not just seven vaccination deaths, but there were 62 deaths from yellow
fever vaccine alone. The men received from 14 to 24 vaccinations of all
varieties but the full report of all vaccination deaths was not given. The
casualties were probably tabulated under other causes. The report of the US
Secretary of War, Henry L. Simpson regarding the deaths from yellow fever
"shots" reads in part:
"RECENT ARMY EXPERIENCE WITH YELLOW FEVER VACCINE RESULTED IN 28,505 CASES OF
HEPATITIS (disease of the liver) WITH 62 deaths, as of July 24,
The British Army finally abandoned compulsory vaccination when the numerous
law suits for deaths and damages made it mandatory.
On February 5, 1954, Mr. Birch, Parliamentary Secretary to the
Ministry of Defense, assured Mr. Charles R. Hobson, M. P. that the British
troops retain their right to refuse vaccination and all inoculations, even when
fighting under United Nations Command.
England was the country that introduced compulsory vaccination and being a
proud and somewhat self-righteous nation, she did everything possible to make
vaccination work so she would not have to admit her guilt in this respect. But
with all the subterfuge, artful persuasion and coercion, vaccination was at last
admitted to be a failure and a calamity. Since the vaccination law was repealed
the health of that country has been steadily improving. In view of these
unrefutable facts, it is not compatible with our standards of justice and
democratic ideals for our U. S. government to lend itself to the uses of the
medical and drug trusts in their money-making vaccination schemes.
Dr. Herbert Snow, for 25 years staff surgeon of the London Cancer Hospital
"Of recent years, many men and women in prime of life, have dropped dead
suddenly. I am convinced that some 80 per cent of these deaths are
caused by the inoculations or vaccinations they have earlier undergone.
These are well known to cause grave and permanent disease of the heart.
"The coroner always hushes it up as natural causes. I have
been trying to get these cases referred to an Independent Commission of inquiry,
but so far, in vain."
So far the investigations have been thwarted by committees staffed or
influenced by medical men who were there to promote their own interests. Is our
nation to continue on the decline until it passes into oblivion like some of the
earlier nations that invited corruption for private gain. If we want to reverse
the present trend we may have to take drastic action to dislodge the decadent
medical system from public domination and outlaw the use and sale of poison
drugs that are at present parading under the name of healing agents.
These are just a few of the hundreds of cases of blindness, paralysis,
cancer, ulcers and other diseases of vaccination that resulted in death. Most of
these photographs were collected by Anti-Vaccination League of England and
America and published in VACCINATION AT WORK and other books on the subject of
Mona Stevenson of Humphrey St. Burnley, England, was
vaccinated at the age of five weeks by Dr. J. W. Clegg, with the official
glycerinated calf-lymph, after five weeks of suffering in which the childs
face and arm was partly eaten away by the vaccine disease, the child died.
The same doctor certified the cause of death as "generalized vaccinia, 36
days, and exhaustion."
LOCKJAW CAUSED BY VACCINATION.
Willie Hood, six year old son of J.G. Hood, 4150 Lafayette
Ave., St. Louis, Mo. died of lockjaw following vaccination on Oct. 14, 1917.
(Details given in the Vaccination Inquirer, Nov. 1, 1917)
Charles Higgens, of New York, shows photographs of five other fatal cases
of post-vaccinal lock-jaw in his well documented book "The Horrors of
Vaccination. (Pub. 1920) Records of 30 other fatal cases of this disease in
New York, were published by Mr. James A. Loyster, of New York, whose son
died of infantile paralysis (cerebral) as a result of vaccination. (The
account of this case is given on page 33 of VACCINATION AT WORK, published
by the National Anti-Vaccination-League.
LOATHSOME DISEASE GENERATED BY VACCINATION
Ethel Mary Thompson, age seven months, (from Skene Row,
Aberdeen) was a beautiful, healthy infant until vaccinated. Soon after this
operation ulcers began to develop that never healed. Six weeks later when
the doctor was called, he observed that "there was a great punched-out" hole
right through the arm near the vaccination and another gaping wound in the
arm pit. The flesh in this area had decayed until the ribs were exposed. On
the abdomen was a large brown patch of decaying flesh and the knee was
swollen out of proportion to its normal size. Festering sores were forming
on the toes. After two months of untold suffering the child died.
"Ernest Cheeseman of Rose Cottages, Wescott, Dorking,
England was vaccinated at the age of nine weeks with the standard
glycerinated calf-lymph supplied by the local Government Board on Nov. 3rd.
Up to that time he was healthy and normal and his parents were in good
health. Five days after his vaccination a serious form of syphilitic skin
disease develloped and death relieved him of his suffering on Nov. 30th. The
body was covered with eczema-like eruptions and the feet were drawn up, all
out of shape. The sores that broke out around the mouth looked like burnt
meat and stood out at least half an inch." (From Vaccination at Work)
When syphilis results from vaccination, it is the usual claim of the
doctors, that the mother must surely have syphilis and certainly
communicated it to the child. In Wales when 4,000 infants were found to be
syphilitic after their vaccinations, all the parents were examined by the
doctors in an effort to lay the blame on them, but the parents were found to
be free from syphilis.
In the case of the Cheeseman baby, the same cowardly accusations were
made against the mother, by the doctors. She willingly underwent a medical
examination and it was found that she was normal and healthy, with no
syphilitic taint. The examiner stated:
"I do not think there is any reason whatever to suspect that she has ever
suffered from syphilis. I find no indication of such disease."
Some of the doctors at the inquest persisted in their morbid character
defamation charges against the mother and refused to believe the medical
report that gave her a clean bill of health. On the strength of their own
opinions they insisted that she was syphilitic and would not be able to give
birth to another normal baby.
To prove that the accusations of the doctors were unjustified she had the
following photograph taken after the birth of her next child, Frederick
John, who was 10 weeks old at the time his was taken. It is apparent that
the child is well and healthyand unvaccinated. The fathers (in England) who
refused to have their children serve prison terms under compulsory
vaccination but many of them accepted this punishment in order to save their
children from the deadly effects of vaccination.
Rita and Eberhard Kandlbinder, died on June, 1951, as a
result of vaccination.
The Munchner Illustrierte, June 28, 1951, reported the "mysterious death
of six infants after smallpox vaccinations." After the photographs and story
of these deaths occurred many other parents came forth with similar stories,
although the doctors had named some other cause for the deaths. Most of the
vaccination deaths are unknown because they are unreported as such (see the
chapter on Falsified Death Certificates, Book II).
BLINDNESS FROM VACCINATION
"Horace Capewell of 5 Court St.,
Southbridge, England, was a fine healthy baby with beautiful eyes. He was
vaccinated when five weeks old. Nine days later his body was a mass of
sores. His eyes became affected and at the age of five months he was totally
blind Many doctors at Birmingham had the case under treatment but nothing
could restore his sight This was taken many years later at the age of 20
Photostat of death certificate of victim of vaccination.
There is no doctor or test that can predict whether or not vaccination will
bring death, disability or the potentialities of future disease. Is the risk
worth the dubious promise of immunity?
INFLAMATION OF THE BRAIN FROM VACCINATION
These beautiful, healthy twins, Peter and Portia Furness,
aged 4½ years died two weeks after being vaccinated with certified
government vaccine The deaths took place May, 1931 at South Wigston, near
Leicester, England. This is one of the few cases in which the doctors
admitted the real cause of death on the death certificate as being
Margaret Ann, the only daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Donald W.
Gooding, of Wolsey, Essex, England, was pronounced a perfect baby by the
doctor when she was born. This beautiful and healthy infant was vaccinated
at the age of 4 months. The first two injections didnt take so a third
vaccination was given, after which inflammation of the brain developed
within 5 days. She was taken to the hospital where she remained for many
weeks. At the age of 13 months she was blind and could not learn to walk.
She also developed digestive disturbances and convulsions.
This tragic case was brought to the attention of the House of Commons in
the hope that an investigation would be made of the hazards of vaccination
and others would be warned of the danger. Mr. Bevan was shown the
possibility of other similar results if the same practice was continued and
he was asked if he would make the result of his inquiry fully available to
the House of Commons and the public.
If he ever made an honest investigation it would result in an unqualified
condemnation of vaccination. This he did not do so far as I have been able to
BLINDNESS FROM VACCINATION
This child was a healthy, normal child at birth. When she
was a year and a half old she was vaccinated, after which her eyes began to
exude matter and within a week they closed and she has been blind ever
since. Dr. Blasson, Dr. Kynaston and the famous specialist, Dr. Bell Taylor,
all examined the child and acknowledged that the blindness was due to
Because the father defied the vaccination law and refused to have his
other child vaccinated he was to be prosecuted. He carried his blind child
into the court room and showed her eyes and her arm which was enlarged,
deformed and sore from the shoulder to the finger tips. The evidence and the
public sentiment against the vaccination law influenced the magistrates to
exempt the father from having his other child vaccinated.
INFANTILE PARALYSIS FROM VACCINATION
John James MacDonald was well and normal when vaccinated.
After a time his vaccinated arm withered and drew up until it was useless.
Then his right leg became emaciated and so drawn up that he could no longer
walk. The vaccination refused to heal and in addition to that, a festering
sore developed on his foot.
WRITER PARALYZED BY VACCINATION
Job West of Bradford-On-Avon was vaccinated as a boy and
partially paralyzed soon after the injection. For many years he lost the
power of voluntary movement of the lower limbs. In spite of his handicap and
suffering he became a renowned "student and authority on the vaccination
question, and a most prolific writer on the subject."
SLOW DEATH THROUGH VACCINATION
Elsie Thuroff was born March 3, 1920 and vaccinated June 8,
1921. In August of the same year she began suffering from "violent grinding
pains, and swelling and distortion of the bones of her arm up to her
shoulder. The medical diagnosis was tuberculosis of the bones. She underwent
an operation after which the condition grew steadily worse until her arm
drew up and became helpless. The skin of the face burned away. The
vaccination marks suppurated and the body wasted away to a living skeleton.
"After suffering excruciating pain she died on the 8th of January, 1923."
DOCTORS WARNED NOT TO VACCINATE ECZEMA CASES
This six year old boy died of generalized vaccinia. He had
been subject to eczema since the age of six weeks. Since eczema is a
condition of extreme toxemia (acidosis or internal poisoning) the poison
from the vaccine serum intensified the body poisoning and he died September
In March 1953, Dr. George Taylor of Bradford vaccinated his five-months old
daughter who was suffering from a mild case of eczema and the baby died nine
days later of generalized vaccinia and eczema. The doctors are beginning to see
the seriousness of poisoning the already poisoned sick with more poison in the
form of vaccine serums.
USELESS ARM FROM VACCINE POISONING
William Hamilton was vaccinated at three
months of age. The poison spread and the sores never healed. The case was
attended by six doctors but they gave it up as a hopeless case. His arm has
been useless since the vaccination in infancy, The photo was taken when he
was 15 years of age.
VACCINATION CAUSES MISCARRIAGE
A careful check showed that "47 per cent of women who had been
vaccinated in the second or third month of pregnancy, failed to give birth to a
normal child." (p. 47, "Vaccination at Work)"
The Consulting Pediatrician of Lanarkshire County Council in an article in
The Lancet (London) December 6, 1952 reported one of the typical cases of this
survey. This woman was about three months pregnant when she was vaccinated for
smallpox. The report states: "She developed a severe primary reaction and three
months later she was spontaneously delivered of a feeble hydropic premature
infant covered with a very severe generalized vaccinia. The child died 18 hours
Many of the new strange diseases of modern times can be traced to vaccination
or medication of the child or the mother.
Because some of the photographs of cases shown in the preceding pages have
been collected from other countries as well as United States and some of the
deaths occurred a number of years ago, some may wonder if vaccination deaths are
so rare that these must be used. Although photographs are not often made of
vaccination victims there are, nevertheless, an unbelievable number of such
cases that are hushed up and the death certificate often gives some other cause.
The medically staffed health departments rarely make inquiry regarding these
cases and, unfortunately, there are very few courageous and public spirited
people or organizations who are willing to spend the time and money to make such
an investigation. However, just to show how much can be uncovered with a little
effort I am presenting a partial list of the vaccinationdeaths that were traced down by just one man, V. E.
Rowton, in just one year, 1921, in just one medium-sized city, Denver,
Colorado. A local "Optional Vaccination League" helped to find other cases. Most
of these tragedies were reported by members of the families or other
eye-witnesses to the crimes.
"My wife, Ethel Andrews, was in good health until she was vaccinated by
Dr.------ , about November 1, 1922. The vaccination started "to take" in three
days began to fester and the arm was swollen. About the 9th of November, she
broke out with a pronounced skin rash all over her body. On November 29, she
became seriously ill. Sores appeared in place of the rash and the doctor said it
was smallpox. On December 5th, she died."
"My daughter, Ruth Yvonne, six years old, was in perfect health until
Saturday, December 3, 1921, when we were advised by our family physician, Dr. C.
F. Henger, to have her vaccinated, which we did. . . About the third day her arm
began to hurt but she continued to attend school until Friday. On Saturday she
complained of a sore throat. She became sick at her stomach and vomited. Her
condition grew worse. The doctors could do nothing to save her and she died on
Tuesday about 5:15 (1921)."
Mrs. H. P. Kingsley, of the Ellsworth Hotel, Denver, gave the following
statement about her son John:
"He was in perfect health when I took him to school on Monday. He was told he
must be vaccinated before he could enter school so I had him vaccinated on the
following Monday. His knee started hurting soon after the vaccination but he
went to school the next morning. That was the last day he was ever to go to
school again. The pain went to every joint in his body and he suffered intensely
for three weeks; then he passed away."
This data about the death of Mrs. Alta Vincent, 18 years of age, was given by
her husband, Luther Vincent, (Denver.)
"About November 13, 1922, my wife submitted to vaccination in order to hold
her position with the telephone company. Up to the time of the vaccination she
was in good health. On December 8th, she became quite ill with enlarged
lymphatic glands under her arms. On the 10th she died."
"My wife was vaccinated by Dr. A. W. Calhoun of Denver, on October 27, 1922.
At the time of the vaccination she was not in very good health. She died a few
hours after the vaccination in our home. The doctor pronounced it heart
(This report was given by her husband, Mr. Padgett)
Walter Call was vaccinated about November 20, 1922. He was able to work for a
week after being vaccinated although he was ill during the time. He died on
December 8, 1922 with black smallpox.
Lafayette Hunt of Denver, Colorado, was vaccinated November 6, 1922. He
developed smallpox on November 18th and died of it November 28, 1922.
Hulda Berg of Denver was vaccinated for smallpox some years ago. On October
27, 1922, she became ill with a severe headache and a rash. Dr. Kesley thought
it was measles. The health officer was called the following Sunday. He
pronounced it smallpox and she was taken to the hospital where she died soon
Ada McDaniels (Denver) was vaccinated twice shortly before she was stricken
with smallpox. She died on November 25, 1922.
Mr. Louis Pleines (Denver) was vaccinated when a boy and again six weeks
before he came down with smallpox, He died of smallpox on February 5, 1923.
Mrs. E. P. Haddon (Denver) was in good health until Sunday, November 12,
1922, when she was vaccinated by her family physician, and nearly collapsed at
the time. The next day, Monday, she was ill. She was worse on Tuesday so the
doctor turned the case over to the health officer. She was quarantined for
smallpox on Wednesday and died the following Monday, November 20th.
The street addresses of these cases are on file but have been omitted for
Mr. and Mrs. Alvord of South Cascade, had a healthy, robust child. It was
vaccinated by Dr. Peters. About 9 days later it began to have convulsions. The
doctor was called and treated it. He said he was especially interested because
it was a vaccinated case. The convulsions occurred after the doctor left and he
was called again but the child died before he arrived. After a post mortem by
Doctors Peters and Gillett, the cause of death was reported as colitis. No
mention was made of the recent vaccination.
Miss Hamilton, a school teacher, became seriously ill two weeks after her
vaccination. Smallpox pustules broke out over her back in the region of the
kidneys. She died soon after. The doctor reported the cause to be acute dilation
of the heart. (This condition does not happen without a cause. The
blood-poisoning effect of the vaccination wasnt mentioned.)
Another school teacher of Colorado Springs (name withheld) submitted to
vaccination in March in order to hold her position. She was never well after
that and died on November 17, 1922.
Mr. Charles Kiner, of Colorado Springs, gave the following report:
"In the fall of 1922 we started our only child, a little girl, to school. She
was in excellent health at the time but after she had attended two months we
were told that she must be vaccinated or leave school. We were opposed to it but
had to submit. Soon after she was vaccinated she broke out with sores and was
not able to attend school again for six weeks. She started again but was too
sick to continue. We called our family physician, Dr. Gillett, and he said she
had erysipelas. She passed away about 9 days later."
Mrs. Caldwell (Colorado Springs) was vaccinated and nearly lost her arm as a
result of the long-continued inflammation. Eight months later she had smallpox
in spite of the vaccination. (Or because of it)
"Our baby was vaccinated in the fall of 1921. Four days after the vaccination
the arm became very sore and swollen; inflammation spread over the shoulder and
up the neck to the back of her ear. It continued to get worse and on the sixth
day the doctor said it was mastoiditis. The next day the baby went into
convulsions and died on the 9th day after the vaccination." Reported by the
mother name withheld (Colorado Springs.)
Mrs. Ellen Cook (Denver) was vaccinated at the City Hall on November 15,
1922. "In five days", she reported, "I was very sick and couldnt even lift my
head for several days without vomiting. My arm was badly swollen and full of
painful lumps from my shoulder to my elbow and was purple with congestion. It
felt like there was a cord drawn from my breast to my arm which gave me intense
pain. I was quite helpless for three weeks then it broke out in sores at three
different times. A year and three months has passed and it is not well yet."
(February 28, 1923)
As a result of the findings of this privately conducted survey of vaccination
disasters, Mr. Rowton and his group feel they found enough evidence to prove
that there is no benefit whatsoever, but considerable danger in the popular but
damaging practices listed below:
SHOTS THAT CAN BE DEADLY
1 Schick Test
2 Dick Test
3 Tuberculin Test
4 Wasserman Test
5 Smallpox Vaccination
6 All Other Vaccinations
7 Cold Shots
8 Penicillin Shots
9 All Other Shots
10 Lumbar Puncture
11 Shots For Childbirth
12 Dog Vaccination
13 Pasteur Treatments For Rabies.
"Medical science is a form of delusional madness from which
few medical men ever recover. Backed by commercialism, this madness runs
roughshod over the life and health of the people."Herbert M. Shelton, Ph.D.,
In the Dark Ages when a decadent church dominated the state and religious
persecution b e c a m e intolerable, the people rebelled and demanded separation
of church and state. In countries where this popular request was not granted,
those who wanted religious freedom fled to other countries where more liberty
and justice were possible. The newly discovered America became a refuge for
those who sought freedom from tyranny and subjection. The constitution, that the
Founding Fathers drew up was originally intended to protect the people from
encroachments on civil liberties and human rights, whether it be from the
self-appointed dictators of powerful financial interests, or from political,
religious or economic pressures.
Dr. Benjamin Rush and Dr. Josiah Bartlett (both congressmen
and signers of the Declaration of Independence) foresaw the medical tyranny that
was, even then, laying its groundwork for domination of the healing field. In an
effort to block this threatening menace they tried to introduce legislative
measures that would insure freedom from medical tyranny as well as the other
freedoms necessary to democracy. Their efforts were thwarted, however, by the
preponderance of orthodox medical men in congress at that time, whose personal
interest stood m the way of public good. Some of these men even refused to sign
An excerpt from one of the valiant speeches of Dr. Rush is as follows:
"The Constitution of the Republic should make provision for medical
freedom as well as for religious freedom. To restrict the art of healing to one
class of men (such as medical doctors) and deny equal privileges to others (also
trained in healing) will constitute the Bastile of medical science. All such
laws are Un-American and despotic. They are fragments of monarchy and have no
place in a Republic."
The failure of congress to establish freedom from medical domination has cost
the nation countless billions of dollars and needless loss of life and health of
The medical dictatorship has extended its tentacles, since that time, until
it now has control over a much wider area than the church ever did. Not only is
our Public Health Service completely manned by the narrow and limited ability of
this one branch of business, but it also wields its dictatorial power over the
schools, colleges, charities, churches, public libraries, press, radio, womens
clubs, P.T.A., life insurance companies and many industries and businesses, even
the Civil Service, which of all things, should respect the Constitution in its
law against trusts.
This medical strangle hold did not just happen with the passing of time; it
was a planned conspiracy against the American people, with an "eye" to the
financial gains of the doctors. A sample of this strategy may be seen in the
following speech of Dr. W. A. Evans, one of the top medical "bosses," and Health
Commissioner for the city of Chicago, who gave these instructions to the doctors
in their annual convention of the American Medical Association
"The thing for the medical profession to do, is to get right into, and man
every important health movement; man health departments, tuberculosis societies,
housing societies, child care and infant societies, etc. The future of the
profession depends on it. . . The profession cannot afford to have these
places occupied by other than medical men."
This pronouncement was published in the journal of the A. M. A., September
16, 1911. Just how whole-heartedly this decree was carried out is clearly shown
by how completely all the non-medical schools of healing such as chiropractic,
naturopathic, religious science, hygienics, etc., have been excluded from such
tax supported institutions as health boards, public hospitals, army camps, state
prisons, workmans compensation bureaus, asylums, etc.
Annie Riley Hale, in her MEDICAL VOODOO has this to say of the Dr. Evans
That the future of his profession depended on getting the
whip-hand in Public Health Service, and that the profession could not
afford to forego the political advantage accruing from such monopoly
will be interpreted by some as a virtual confession on the part of
regular medicine that it either realized it had nothing of therapeutic
value to offer the sick world, or that it had despaired of winning the sick
patronage by fair means, and must therefore have recourse to political intrigue.
"However it may be interpreted, here we have recorded evidence of a
deliberate plan by organized official medicine, openly declared in convention
assembled, to monopolize a great public agency like the Public Health Service
affecting all the people and paid for by all the people to the utter
exclusion of other healing professions legalized under existing laws.
The effect of the adoption and vigorous prosecution of the Evans resolution
has been to (1) enhance the political power of organized medicine under the
official name of American Medical Association, and (2) to
enable the medical trust to hamper, harass, and where possible,
suppress their therapeutic rivals in order to destroy competition. . .
Destroying competition and crushing smaller businesses for monetary gain is
precisely what the SHERMAN ANTI-TRUST LAW was designed to prevent. Thus, the A.
M. A. in carrying out the Evans program has taken on all the offensive features
and oppressive overlordism of a swollen commercial trust."
There may be some independent medical practitioners who do not belong to or
support the A. M. A. and these would not be held accountable for the damage done
by the "outlaw" practices of the "association."
In the MEDICAL TRUST UNMASKED, the author tells of agreements and contracts
between the medical societies and the insurance companies that are designed to
defend the doctors against law suits brought against them for malpractice in
which they kill or maim their patients. He tells that there are (or were when he
wrote the book in 1935, perhaps more now) 70,000 doctors in 32 states who have
knowingly entered into these agreements which are nothing short of
deadly conspiracy against the life and welfare of the people. On page
64 he states:
"Twenty-eight of these thirty-two states grant this defense as part of the
regular benefits derived from being a member of the American Medical
Association. Membership alone is sufficient to insure the physician that he will
be defended by the whole closely banded fraternity, should he ever be sued for
A statement of peculiar significance is included in the following paragraph:
"Twenty-four of these medical societies furnish expert witnesses to
testify on behalf of the accused (the doctor). Eighteen of these
societies pay all expenses incurred by such witnesses, as well as
special remuneration for testifying favorably, some of it running as
high as $50.00 a day."
These "expert witnesses" may live 1,000 miles from the scene of the crime and
know nothing about it except what they are paid to say. Is this any different
from the methods of the professed criminals of the underworld?
The patients or survivors of a medical crime are given a full course of
intimidation and threats by the doctors in order to discourage them from suing
and most of them withdraw when they see the hopelessness of winning
against the "fix".
In a confidential report submitted by the Board of Trustees of the American
Medical Association to its electoral body at its Dallas convention in 1926, the
doctors were assured that the A. M. A. was seeking means of preventing
malpractice suits The report reads:
"It cannot be too strongly insisted that the prevention of claims
is the object sought, and not merely the adjustment of such claims as arise, nor
the indemnification of physicians against loss"
No provision for the welfare of the patient was made and no consideration for
his rights was deemed of any importance.
"As a consequence of its monopoly position, financial resources, and
political strength, organized medicine is able to maintain a quasi-legal
status in medical societies to appoint or recommend members of regulatory
bodies. A.M.A. standards in medical education, training, and practice are
usually adopted by law. In addition, A. M. A. inspection to determine whether
its own standards have been satisfied is seldom subject to judicial review.
Thus the political authority of the state itself has in effect been
delegated to organized medicine."
"Some rather expert observations of the art of lobbying as practiced in
Washington assert that the A. M. A. is the only organization in the country that
could marshal 140 votes in Congress between sundown Friday night and noon on
Monday. Performances of this sort have led some to describe the A. M. A. lobby
as the most powerful in the country."
"In 1954 sixteen individuals and groups reported to Congress that they spend
more than $50,000 each on their legislative interests. The biggest one of these
groups admitted it had spent $547,000 on this matter of influencing legislation
through their powerful lobbying groups." from "World Predictions," 1955.
"The Tarnished Record of the American Medical Association"
published by the Milwaukee Federated Trades Council states:
The A. M. A. at its 1949 convention voted to make the $25.00 assessment
permanent. It further urged its members to engage in political action to
defeat congressmen whom it could not control ..
"In the 26th Pennsylvania district, a group of doctors calling themselves the
Healing Arts Committees mailed out more than 190,000 letters, made more than
120,000 personal telephone calls, placed a series of 12 advertisements in every
newspaper and purchased radio time to urge the defeat of the local congressman
who had supported a measure not favorable to them."
An excerpt from the speech of a congressman and recorded in the CONGRESSIONAL
RECORD says that the A. M. A. had "a record of almost unparalleled
opposition to social and economic progress, blindness to need, and resistance to
Many laws designed by and for the benefit of the A. M. A. have been
"pressured through" without the vote or the approval or even the knowledge of
Just recently a high pressure opportunist group tried to force a measure
through Congress whereby their competitors could be barred from the
mails without notice and without a jury trial (it was defeated). That
is even worse than the present law which allows the medical trust to bar
their competitors from the mails on false charges and without a jury trial.
But the victim is allowed a few days notice. This is an unfair law and should be
The DEFENDER MAGAZINE, Wichita, Kansas (May 1955) under the heading HEALTH
DICTATORSHIP, comments: "We are getting a look-see as to how the
American Medical Association pulls strings and controls policies of the
government in-so-far as the Pure Food and Drug law is concerned."
Former Intelligence Officer of the United States Government, Major Robert H.
Williams, in his Bulletin (April 27, 1955) states:
"Sane people are being arrested and held for mental observation without a
trial, a thing I would hardly have believed had I not seen it happen. Bills are
appearing in the state legislatures designed to impower the state to SEIZE ANY
CITIZEN and legally hold him for observation or for compulsory treatment . "
This is one of the Gestapo methods of eliminating honest competition. When
these sane people are forced into the mental institutions they are given
frequent injections with the "poisoned needle" and are soon rendered incapable
of rational thinking or coherent speech. At this stage they are brought before
the "Board" for questioning and, of course, declared to be insane and therefore
confined permanently to the institution. A bullet in the back would be less
cowardly than this.
The word DOCTOR comes from the Greek term di-daktor,
which means "one who imparts knowledge to others a teacher." The Latins
condensed it to "doc-to-ro" and it was later shortened to
doctor. Medical doctors are not teachers. In fact part of their instructions at
medical school is not to tell the patient much. They are not,
as a rule, very well informed on the real cause and cure of disease so they
could not teach it if they wanted to. A dictionary gives one definition of
doctor as "a learned person." If either of these definitions
were the criterion for issuing medical degrees it would eliminate about 99 per
cent of the practitioners from the title of doctor. Yet, they
have sought a monopoly on this word in-so-far as the healing field is concerned.
The word CURE has also been taken over by the medical trust
as its private property and drugless doctors and writers have been barred from
the mails and persecuted in other ways for teaching how nature cures or for
using or speaking of a cure for some disease.
The latest encroachment on public rights is the medical monopoly on the word
HEALTH. In some states they have made it a law that no drugless
practitioner may use the word HEALTH on his advertising, signs or titles. The
NATUROPATH magazine, January 1955 (published for Naturopathic
doctors) reported this situation in the editorial, by Dr. T W. Schippell.
Excerpts from this editorial are as follows:
" . . . Every day we see additional liberties of the independent practitioner
trampled under foot more non-conformist healers jailed or driven from the
"There has just come to hand a letter from an independent practitioner who
has long been the head of a liberal school of healing in Chicago where he
conducts a health regaining emporium .. He is finding out the hard way, that any
outstanding success in the natural healing field brings with it, as a definite
reaction, the unbridled wrath of medical men everywhere ..
"The established rule of medical fair play in this country seems to be: If
you cannot beat a rival practitioner on the market place, you must unseat him
through some ordinance or statute in the legislative halls. And that is what has
happened in Chicago. Excerpts from the letter will show the sequence of events
as they happened:
"Some months ago I was called into the State Department of Education and
Registration and was warned by that august body that I could no longer use the
word NATUROPATH on my letterheads, doors or windows.
"I was informed further that I must substitute the word Chiropractor in the
place of Naturopath as well as use it in my advertising. So returning to my
Health Emporium, I took a razor blade and the word Naturopath disappeared from
my signs on my doors and windows. My hope that I had met every medical
requirement was quickly blasted. Just last week I received another communication
from that same State Department of Education and Registration and upon calling
at that office, was immediately pushed into the sanctum of its attorney. This
gentleman opened the interview with a scowl and this remark: It looks like we
are having a little trouble getting you into line, doctor.
To which I required: What have I done wrong, now?.
"His beetle-like brows closed together; he clasped his hands before him on
the desk and continued to scowl at me: Get that word HEALTH off your doors,
windows, letterheads and do it quick.
"To which remark I replied: My business has long been known as a HEALTH
EMPORIUM. I built my reputation on that designation and have spent many
thousands of dollars to bring it to the attention of the public. I can hardly
remove the word HEALTH without ruining my business.
"His reply was short and to the point: The word HEALTH belongs exclusively
to the medical doctors. It is illegal for anyone else to use it in any manner.
There is a law now in effect which gives the medical profession a monopoly on
the word HEALTH and youd better get that in your head clearly right now!"
This doctor consulted his attorney and found that such a law had been
engineered through the state legislature by same underhanded methods they (the
medical trust) had pushed other death-dealing measures into operation, such as
(1) vaccination, which is known to kill more people every year than smallpox
does, (2) tuberculin testing of cows which required the killing of 1,500,000
healthy cows because of false testing in just 10 years time, with a lost of
$1,500,000,000 to the dairymen, (3) rabies shots for dogs, which increase
diseases in the animals but do not prevent rabies, (4) fluorine (rat poison) in
public water supplies because there is a cheap surplus of the product on hand
and the owners want to make profit on it, also other practices that are damaging
to the public but profitable to the promoters.
Back in the middleages, Galileo was
tormented, tortured, and threatened with death because he taught that the world
was round. We like to relegate to the past such acts of ignorance and barbarism,
and believe that such outrages against progress could not happen in our day and
age. But we are having parallels of this same kind of intolerance in the healing
field. For instance, Dr. Herbert M. Shelton, Ph.D., D.C., N.D., and head of the
Hygienic Movement, was imprisoned several times in New York because he helped
people overcome their diseases by observing the laws of health. Saving lives and
restoring health is considered a crime in New York and several other states that
are ruled by the medical trust, if these works are done by any outside the
medical ring. The medical field has no sure cure for any
disease, so the people are obliged to suffer and die rather than permit someone
who does understand the law of cure to aid
them. Dr. Shelton is one of the few practitioners who understands the
cause and cure of disease, and seeing that New York is a city of sick
people in need of help that they were not getting, he defied the
un-American medically made law of New York which prohibits drugless
doctors from practicing, opened up an office and was soon gaining fame by his
superior results in healing. For this he was imprisoned without even a trial by
jury. In accordance with the formalities of pretended justice, an investigator
of the Court of Special Sessions in New York, wrote to the Investigator of the
State Medical Board in Texas for information about Dr. Shelton. The investigator
interviewed Dr. Shelton and after seeing the nature and quality of his work with
its consistent effectiveness, had said to him, "I see nothing in your work that
is a violation of the law. Stick to it and I will never bother you." He sent a
fine report to the New York investigator which was never read before the court.
The judge declared him guilty on the opinion of the medical witness and he was
sentenced to prison. When he was released, he continued to help the sick and
needy and was imprisoned again and again because he refused to respect a law
that was enforced against public good and established without the approval or
vote of the people. This did not happen in the Dark Ages; it happened in our
day, just a few years ago.
A little later, in 1948, Dr. Gian-Cursio, Chiropractor and
Hygienist, was sentenced to prison when his drugless healing system and
sanitarium, THE CASTLE OF HEALTH, was becoming noted for its successful healing
of diseases that the doctors had not been able to cure. He was framed and
sentenced to a year in prison without being allowed a trial by jury. (Even a
murderer is permitted a jury trial). He was even denied an appeal. The charges
were that he was harming people although no evidence was brought forth to prove
this statement. A great many of his healed patients were anxious to testify but
they were not permitted to do so. As he was a drugless doctor
he did not use drugs or any of the dangerous methods such as X-ray, radium,
surgery, or anything else that could harm a patient. His
testimony was disregarded and only that of the medical "expert
witness" (?) was considered valid. So this innocent man of high ideals and clean
living had to serve a prison term with hardened criminals while his family was
left without support. So openly unjust was this case that letters and telegrams
from all parts of United States and even from England, France and Canada poured
into the offices of the judge and Governor Dewey of New York, asking
that this man he given a fair frial by jury, or an appeal to a higher
court, but this was denied.
From his prison cell Dr. Gian-Cursio wrote: (To Dr. Shelton)
"It is a strange schooling that our enemies have forced upon us. It profits
us in ways nor expected by them. Prior to, during and after incarceration
friendships are strengthened, men who are brothers in arms become more
determined in the promulgation of their cause and they acquire a form of wisdom
obtained by few.
In this crucible a reformer attains maturity of mind and spirit.
"Our enemies, by making this possible, befriend us. This is a paradox that
must be lived to be fully appreciated. Persecution is a sign of decadence. When
it ends with imprisonment of the persecuted it is more than a symptom of rot of
man and principles, it is a sign of death as moral beings."
These acts of violence indicate the downward trend of organized medicine,
toward its own dissolution.
In Florida, where a compulsory Tuberculosis law has been
foisted on the people, a man dropped dead in the doctors office just a few
minutes after the physician had given him a compulsory "shot". In the trial that
ensued, the other physicians testified that, "It wasnt their colleagues fault;
the patient just couldnt take it." The doctor went free, though he was guilty
of murder as well as malpractice
Supreme Court Justice Cardozo said, in rendering a decision:
Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to
determine what shall be done to his own body, and a surgeon who performs an
operation (vaccination is technically an operation) without his patients
consent, commits an assault for which he is liable in damages."
A British doctor published in a medical journal a detailed account of how he
killed a patient. The medical council held that Dr. Barton could not be
prosecuted unless it could be proved that Bartons action did
hasten death, that he acted knowingly, and that the patient actually died. Baron
told the doctors, "Thank God, you have to prove these things, otherwise you and
I would not be free." These or any other guilty physicians are not going to
prison or to the electric chair because all they have to do is to declare that
their action did not hasten death. Medical doctors license does not protect the
public; it protects the doctors from prosecution by the public.
"Dr. Simon Louis Katzoff, M.D. wrote. DOCTORS LIVE BY DISEASE, SO
THE PUBLIC CAN EXPECT THE SUPPLY OF DISEASE TO MEET THE DEMANDS OF THE MEDICAL
PROFESSION. When it doesnt meet the demands, the Health Boards and
Tuberculosis societies clamor for compulsory hospitalization and treatment,
seizing the victims property to pay them."
Not only are the health doctors with their superior methods
put out of business by the medical "wrecking crew" but the
books that teach the truth about healing are under constant
attack also. The medical trust has its stooges planted in the post office
department and when a good health book gives them too much competition they have
a "fraud order" issued and the author and publisher no longer have the use of
the mails. These medically made laws see to it that they do not have to come out
in the open and declare themselves as the attackers. The author has to fight an
unseen enemy who is protected by the law and does not even have to have any
proof that the book or author has violated any law. I have followed some of
these cases closely and have read the complete transcript of the court
proceedings and there is no semblance of justice in this process. The author and
the book is condemned and barred from the mails, sometimes even before the
hearing. There is never any trial by jury and the decision is always against the
writer and in favor of the concealed medical opponent. The decision is based
entirely on the private opinion of a hired medical witness. The testimony and
proof of innocence of the writers are entirely ignored. as there is no jury.
In l946, during one of our largest polio epidemics in Los Angeles, I wrote a
book (POLIO CONTROL) exposing the polio racket. My statements were well
documented and the doctors didnt like it. I believe it would have eliminated
polio epidemics if it had been allowed to reach the people. I had the manuscript
examined by a lawyer before I had it published to be sure everything was legal
and in order. I had the Los Angeles Post Office authorities examine it to be
sure there was nothing in it for which I could be legally barred from the mails
and it was declared within the law. The medical trust had their stooges work for
two years trying to get something on me so they could legally put me out of
business but when they failed they brazenly issued a fraud order
without any legal grounds or lawful reasons. They knew I had no money to fight a
case with so they thought I would probably "stay put" when they destroyed my
business and put the book out of circulation. I talked to one of the post office
officials and asked what I could do and he said, "You can take your lawyer back
to Washington and fight but it wont do you any good; those cases are sewed up
beforehand." I wrote a long and detailed letter refuting all their false charges
but this was disregarded and I was notified by special messenger I was barred
from the mails eight days before the day set for my hearing in other words, I
was condemned without a trial. I was convicted on the statement of the
medical witness that my "book disagreed with accepted medical belief
and therefore was dangerous." (I admit it could be dangerous to the corrupt
On inquiring around I found others who had been barred also
without cause. One of these was Al Williams, an ex-pugilist, who had established
several gymnasiums in downtown Los Angeles, that were popular with the business
men who were interested in keeping fit. He had an especially successful weight
reducing system that put the medical methods to shame. This bothered some of the
medical boys so they did some string-pulling in Washington and Mr. Williams was
soon barred from the mails on fraud charges. This put him practically out of
business so he took his lawyer and evidence back to Washington to fight the
case, but since no jury trial was permitted and no testimony was accepted except
that of the medical "expert witness" of the opposition, the biased judge passed
the sentence of "guilty". He took the case to the Supreme Court and won, of
course, because he was innocent in the first place and had a clear case. But it
cost him $13,000 and three years loss of business to merely establish his right
to have his mail delivered.
The guilty culprits in the post office department were not reprimanded or
required to pay Mr. Williams damages for his loss. They were left in the same
position where they could do the same thing the next day if they wanted to. Even
the worlds worst gangsters Al Capone and his hatchet men were never guilty
of committing as many underhanded and open crimes against life and property as
the medical trust has done in this country.
For the past 12 years Dr. R. G. Wilborn, D.C., and his firm HEALTH RESEARCH
has conducted the largest health book business in the west. Thousands of
excellent books by educators and the worlds best informed writers on health,
were circulating around through the country and raising the health standards of
the people. Health is a menace and a threat to the medical profession so the
same well-oiled strings were again pulled in Washington and HEALTH RESEARCH was
issued a fraud complaint. Dr. Wilborn and this large health business of many
years standing were to be suddenly and completely ruined by one fell stroke of
the medical dictatorship. Time tested health books that have been selling all
over the world from hundreds of book stores were all at once declared to be the
cause of the fraud order. And, although the other stores would continue to sell
them, HEALTH RESEARCH was to be denied mail delivery and completely put out of
business, for selling these same books.
Dr. Wilborn had heard about some of the questionable fraud order cases, so
years ago before investing in this expensive book business he checked with the
post office authorities and had one of the postal inspectors examine all his
stock of books to be sure they met with the legal specifications. The books were
declared to be in order so when the fraud charges came he knew it did not
originate in the post office department The postal authorities refused to give
the names of the attackers who were seeking to destroy the Health Business, so
in concealing the criminals the postal authorities become parties to the crime.
Excerpts from the fraud complaint are as follows:
"POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF THE CHIEF
HEARING EXAMINER WASHINGTON 25, D.C. (May 11, 1955) delivered May 14, 1955.
In the matter of the complaint that HEALTH RESEARCH, Dr. R. G. Wilborn
(D.C.) and (partner) are engaged in conducting an unlawful enterprise through
the mails . . . The Undersigned, (William C. OBrian) Assistant Solicitor, Fraud
Division, Post Office Dept . . . alleges that the respondents are now and have
been obtaining remittance of money through the mails for various books and
pamphlets entitled: "Commonsense about Cancer", "The Grape Cure",
"Attacking and Arresting Arthritis", "Health for All", "Getting Well", "Is
Cancer Cur-able" "The Prostate Gland Perfect Health", "Tuberculosis, Its Cause
and Cure", "Tumors", and "Back to Eden". by means of false and
fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises as hereinafter set forth.
"That the Publication entitled "Health for All" contains information and
instructions the following of which will effectively treat and cure such
conditions and diseases as sinusitis, bronchial asthma, goiter, colitis,
peptic ulcer, diabetes mellitus, arthritis, rheumatism, high blood pressure and
The complaint goes on telling what the books promise in the way of healing.
The fact that hundreds of people have been healed of these diseases by following
these instructions doesnt concern the medically dominated Post Office Fraud
Department. The medical profession has no cure for any of these diseases and,
like the dog in the manger they intend to prevent anyone else from curing them
either, or even from having the right to choose their reading matter that will
teach them how to do it themselves. These books are also barred from tax
supported public libraries so the people are at the mercy of the disease
producing medical business unless they rise up and throw off the yoke of medical
BACK TO EDEN and the GRAPE CURE were barred once before but were reinstated
because there were no legal grounds for the action and someone had enough money
to fight for them.
HEALTH RESEARCH had sold 500 copies of Back to Eden at $7.00 per copy with a
money-back guarantee and the letters flowed in from the satisfied customers who
had been healed or helped by its information. Yet, the selling of this book was
one or the reasons why Health Research was being prosecuted.
Medically operated organizations and money-making schemes such as the cancer
fund raising organizations, March of Dimes money-making racket, vaccination
campaigns. etc., are allowed to make untrue and impossible claims and promises
and accept fabulous sums of money year after year without ever performing the
benefits or fulfilling their promises, yet they are never barred from the mails
no matter how brazenly fraudulent they are. If even half of the money, that is
filched from the public by these organizations, were put into the hands of some
responsible organization like Dr. Sheltons Hygienic Society and used for public
health education purposes, the present disease crisis of this country could soon
be brought under control.
Dr. Wilborn knew he would not get a fair trial by jury if he tried to fight
the case in Washington so he waged a campaign from his office
in California and hired a good lawyer who knew the post office "set-up", (Attorney
James B. Gooding, of Washington D.C.) to fight the case from there.
When Dr. Wilborns letters (about the fraud complaint) reached the hands of his
large mailing list, a barrage of letters flew to Washington (Congress and
Senate) asking for an investigation of the corrupt, medically contaminated Post
Office Fraud Department. Racketeers dont like to be investigated so the "under
cover boys" in the Post Office modified their charges immediately and admitted
that the books were not fraudulent and were no longer under attack. However,
they still held the whip lash over the head of HEALTH RESEARCH
if its advertising suggested cure in any way, shape or form. The medicos still
insist that the word cure is their private property just the
same as they have tried to "corner" the whole healing business.
The Health Research Case brought into view a number of other
submerged cases. One contact who had been barred from the mails wrote to Dr.
Wilborn as follows: "To give you an idea of what smaller businesses are up
against in the Food and Drug Administration-Post Office combination of
the Medical Trust, let it be remembered that any company can be
put under fraud order without due process of law just upon the
opinion of any lawyer in the Post Office Department. The fraud
law was written in 1874 and needs re-writing to bring about justice. We are
still working with the authorities in Washington to get this done. Once a fraud
smear is issued, then supposedly due process of law can be carried on for its
removal. Actually, however, the set-up is extremely corrupt. It is so corrupt
that the Head Trial Examiner of the Post Office "blew his top" about two years
ago and sent an eleven page report to both the Senate and the House Judiciary
Committees. He then transferred to the Federal Power Commission. His report was
a protest against pressures constantly brought to bear to have him
violate the Administrative Procedures Act which guarantees fair
hearings to citizens, in theory at least, and forbids any private contact with
Examiners or Judges to influence decisions. After his departure, more crooked
A fraud order is supposed to be based on legitimate complaints. When Dr.
Wilborns customers wrote to the Fraud Department for the complaints or for any
statements he had made in his advertising that could be considered
fraudulent, the officials in the Post Office Department wrote:
"This office does not make a general distribution of the specification of
charges issued in these fraud order cases and, therefore your request
for such a copy must be denied."
When Dr. Wilborns customers asked for the names of his accusers, the post
office refused to reveal their names. If a charge is serious enough to ruin a
persons business, reputation and life work, is it asking too much to know who
his attackers are so he can meet them in fair fight?
We like to believe that crime doesnt pay. But we see the constant
multiplication of deaths from unnecessary operations and medically poisoned
patients where the doctor "buries his mistakes" and then collects a small
fortune from the survivors. We see the multi-million dollar "take" from the
vaccination campaigns conducted at least twice a year in all American cities. We
see health businesses and writers ruined by unjust and dishonest fraud orders,
in which they have no chance of winning unless they can afford a Supreme Court
case, and few health idealists are wealthy enough to buy justice at such a
price. Liberty and protection in a free country should be the right of the poor
as well as the rich. We are wondering when we will be released from this curse
of medical domination where crime pays.
The following is a sample of the propaganda that is
frequently seen in the magazines and newspapers and all channels of national
GET POLIO VACCINATION NOW
To Protect Your Child This Summer
Your boy or girl will have the best chance for protection before
polio hits again, if vaccine is given now. The Salk vaccine strikingly
reduced paralytic polio among those who received it in 1955 and it will
protect many thousands in 1956, if it is used in time.
To make a real dent in polio in 1956, vaccinations must be stepped
up immediately. Success will depend on how many children receive at least
two vaccine shots before the next polio season begins. See your doctor or
public health officer NOW for advice about when and where to obtain vaccine.
This is what the people are told. Lets uncover the
facts and see what actually happens when polio vaccine is used.
"Salk vaccine is hard to make and no batch can ever be proved safe
before it is given to children." This is an admission that was made by
Dr. Scheele, (Surgeon General) before the Atlantic City Convention of the
American Association in 1955. (Reported in New York Times, June 8, 1955.)
Being fully aware of the hazardous aspects of the polio vaccine, Dr. Scheele
announced that it was the intention of the U.S. Government to inoculate 57
million people before August 1955. (Report from the Lancet, June 4, 1955)
$9,000,000 of public funds were gambled on this financially promising but
highly questionable venture before it was even declared safe and usable.
Later, when the over dramatized announcement was made that it was "safe"
there was still no scientific evidence or factual proof of its safety.
The promoters of this inflated vaccine "scheme" expected a 5 billion
dollar profit in the first year of operation. (Direct quotations
supporting this statement are given under the topic heading, THE MONEY MOTIVE,
at the end of the chapter.)
Even after the vaccine had killed 7 people and the number was mounting every
day, the propaganda committee put words into the mouths of important government
officials, still insisting that the vaccine was "safe" and must be continued.
The Cutter laboratory was used as the "scape goat" until the many disasters
from the other laboratories could no longer be concealed. Then instead of
abandoning the whole "deadly mess", the Cutter laboratory was declared in good
standing again and allowed to continuenot because its vaccine was any safer,
but because the vaccine from the rest of them was just as deadly, and none of
them intended to stop or lose any profits.
Any doctor, scientist or authority on the subject of vaccine knows that these
substances are "highly toxic" (poison), therefore, no vaccine can be made safe.
Current magazine articles have described in detail, the composition of the Salk
vaccine so it will not be repeated here except to say that the decomposed kidney
tissues and pus from a diseased animal combined with the two poison drugs cannot
be injected into the living blood stream without harmful effects. The records of
the experiments on children show that more of the vaccinated people died
or contracted polio than did the unvaccinated. The fact that all
the vaccinated people did not die does not mean that they were not harmed. No
one knows yet, what the future results will be.
James McIntosh, Professor of Pathology at London University,
in an address before the Royal Society of Medicine, October 19, 1926, stated:
"Scientifically it cannot be disputed that every point of view the injection
of virus capable of multiplying in the body of the individual is bad. When
multiplication of the virus occurs, then there is no possibility of estimating
the dose to which the patient has been subjected. Thus the effect cannot be
controlled, and in susceptible individuals this may lead to unforeseen
Data from the bleedings performed five months after inoculation of Salk
vaccine, indicated that the immunity (if any) did not last long. Dr. Salk is
reported to have said that "children vaccinated last year should be given
booster inoculations this year." An editorial in the Lancet (weekly
Medical Journal April 23, 1955) comments: "If it is found that, contrary to
Salks hopes antibody levels cannot be maintained without a succession of
booster doses, then a serious problem will arise. Will it be necessary to give
injections every year; and, if so, for how long would they be given? . . .
If injections are given regularly for several years to millions of
children the risk of allergic reactions to monkey kidney tissue will become
increasingly grave." (Emphasis mine, McBean)
Dr. Ritchie Russell of the Department of Neurology,
Radcliffe Infirmary Oxford, said, "When poliomyelitis is precipitated by
inoculation the natural defences of the nervous system seem to be ineffective,
and nearly all such illnesses develop into a paralytic form of the disease
affecting especially the limb used for the injection." (Lancet, May 21,
1955, p. 1071)
The Manchester Guardian (April 15, 1955) stated, "One of
Britains greatest physiologists said to-day that if it means that a child
should be re-inoculated at frequent intervals with a preparation derived from
monkey kidneys it is terrifying in its possibilities. Among them is the risk of
the childs developing sensitivity to some of the ingredients of the vaccine."
The editor of the Lancet (June 11, 1955, p. 1207) emphasized this further
when he wrote: "In addition to the possibility of producing the very
disease the vaccine is used to prevent, there is a risk, of unknown dimensions,
that repeated injection of a vaccine prepared from monkey kidney may eventually
sensitize the child in some harmful way."
In April, 1955 after the "big Salk campaign" had been launched in the United
States, the Government and all officials and agencies concerned announced to the
world that "the war against polio was almost certainly at an end."
The other countries are a little more conservative and a little less willing
to be "taken in" by the sales propaganda of the Salk promoters. The general
sentiment of our foreign neighbors was expressed by Dr. A. M. Payne
when he declared: "Poliomyelitis is not beaten. We do not know how long the
effect lasts. . . we do not know if it will be effective under other conditions
than those in which it was used; we do not know how best to use it. We do know
that there are many (unsolved) intricate problems in the manufacture of this
vaccine." (Manchester Guardian, April 14, 1955)
"LONDON, April 22, 1955 (Reuters)The British Medical Journal today
warned physicians against over enthusiastic acceptance of the Salk anti-polio
vaccine citing the possibility of toxic effects."
On this same point the Lancet said it would be "very reluctant to see
the vaccine used on a large scale in Britain without further tests." It also
warned, "the possibility of toxic effects from repeated injections with monkey
tissues must be considered."
Caution was cast to the winds in this country and our U.S. Government and
medical profession had no hesitancy in using the unproved vaccine and
repeating their blundering tests on millions of human beings even after the
large number of deaths and paralysis had proved it to be not only a
failure but a dangerous killer. Most of the experiments were made on children
too small to fight back.
A PARTIAL LIST OF DEATHS FROM SALK VACCINE
Susan Pierce (age 7), Pocatello, Idaho, died April 27, 1955
Ronald Fitzgerald (age 4), Oakland, Calif., died April 27, 1955
Allen Davis Jr. (age 2), New Orleans, La., died May 4, 1955
Janet Kincaid (age 7), Moscow, Idaho, died May 1, 1955
Danny Eggers (age 6), Idaho Falls, Idaho, died May 10, 1955
1.Are the men who set themselves up as authorities on polio really qualified
to decide the issues of life and death?
2. Have the self-styled medical "experts" been infallible enough in their past
decisions to be trusted with the precious lives of our children and our future
3. Have the more effective drugless methods of prevention and treatment
of polio been investigated and tested?
These are some of the questions that people are asking and to which they have
a right to expect satisfactory answers.
In an article titled TRACKING THE KILLER, in LIFE magazine Dr. Salk was asked
if his monkey vaccine was safe. To this query he replied:
"There is no question of how safe is it? It is safe, and it cant
be safer than safe."
Many people would seriously like to believe this statement but available
scientific facts condemn it and hold it up to ridicule.
Shortly after the Salk vaccination program was swung into action, the
American Public Health Service (June 23, 1955) Announced that there
had been "168 confirmed cases of poliomyelitis among the vaccinated,
with six deaths How many vaccinated children will eventually be reported as
developing the disease is as yet unknown . .
"The interval between inoculation and the first sign of paralysis
ranged from 5 to 20 days and in a large proportion of cases it started in the
limb on which the injection had been given. Another feature of the tragedy was
that the numbers developing polio were far greater than would have been expected
had no inoculations been given. In fact in the state of Idaho, according to a
statement by Dr. Carl Eklund, one of the Governments chief virus authorities,
polio struck only vaccinated children in areas where there had been no cases of
polio since the preceding autumn; in 9 out of 10 cases the paralysis occurred in
the arms in which the vaccine had been injected." (News Chronicle, May 6, 1955)
According to the Daily Telegraph (June 18, 1955) Mr. Peterson,
State Health Director of Idaho, stopped further inoculations and stated: "We
have lost confidence in the Salk Vaccine." He also stated that he "holds
the vaccine, together with the instructions for its manufacture, directly
responsible for the outbreak of polio and the deaths that had occurred."
The serum makers were gambling for big stakes and decided that the "show must
go on" in spite of death and disaster. The condemned Cutter laboratory had over
a million dollars worth of deadly vaccine on hand and the disasters had caused
its stock to drop from $15.50 to $8.75 per share, (according to Time,
June 20, 1955). The other 5 laboratories with their $8,000,000 supply of
"Salk liability" were involved also because deaths and disease were being
reported from their vaccines every day. Then suddenly the deaths from
Salk vaccine ceased to be reported. In a letter published in
Defender Magazine, the writer stated: "I am informed by someone who works in
a newspaper office that much of the bad news concerning the results of the
Salk Program is being censored and deleted out of the news to keep people
complacent and acquiescent."
In Australia when a few children died as a result of
smallpox vaccinations the government abolished compulsory vaccination in that
country and smallpox suddenly declined to the vanishing point. Australia had
only three cases of smallpox in 15 years as compared with Japans record of
165,774 cases and 28,979 deaths from this cause in only 7 years (1886-1892)
under compulsory vaccination and re-vaccination.
In Austria, where Bela Schick invented the
Schick test for diptheria, it killed several children and the rulers there
declared it to be too dangerous and prohibited its use in that country.
Apparently Mr. Schick was not concerned with such trivialities as death and
disease; he was out to make money. Most of the European countries didnt trust
him and rejected his poisons, so he brought it to America where he knew the
unscrupulous medical and drug trusts dominate the healing field. Here he found a
ready market. A lush harvest was promised and the customary pressure technique
was turned on and the exploitable public was again used and abused. So we have
seen with the passing of years, that the Schick test and diphtheria anti-toxin
continue to take their toll of lives while our elected officers and public
protectors (?) look the other way.
To show how death, disease and failure of vaccination is ignored in this
country, in favor of fabulous profits for a few, let us recall one of the many
disasters that bear this out:
In Dallas, Texas, 10 children died as a direct result of the
"safe" diphtheria anti-toxin shots. For every one who died, hundreds suffered
from the various vaccine diseases, many of which left permanent disabilities.
This is not a special case; it is typical of all vaccinations. But most parents
do not sue and the other cases never reach public notice. But these Texas
parents were not to be "put off" by medical excuses. Numerous damage suits were
brought against the doctors and the serum manufacturer, H. K. Mulford Co.
The doctors succeeded in evading the issue by claiming that it was a bad batch
of serum. (All serum is bad that doesnt stop them). The Mulford Co. insisted
that it was not a bad batch of serum but was just the same as all their
serum and this lot (series A 377061) had been re-tested and passed
satisfactorily all the tests and requirements conforming to the laboratory of
the Public Health Service at Washington D.C.
The complaints of the parents were that "the diphtheria anti-toxin
sold by the Mulford Co., was unfit, poisonous, dangerous and deadly."
The doctors and serum company displayed great dexterity in juggling terms,
inventing excuses and denying guilt but the children were still just as dead as
a result of shots from the "whitewashed" serum as if they had been shot with
bullets, and it was irrefutably proved in court that the vaccine serum
killed them. Damages aggregating $78,000 were paid to the parents of
the dead children, by the Mulford Co. The Mulford Co. wishing to continue in the
same blood poisoning business and also wishing to dodge public disapproval, had
its attorneys specify that "the judgement shall fall, not on the Mulford
Co. but on Mr. Pierce Russell, the Mulford distributor." He was,
probably, the least guilty of any of them because he could not have contaminated
the sealed ampules of vaccines. However, his employer, undoubtedly made it worth
his whilefinancially.......to take the blame. In this type of "white collar"
murder, (the legally proved), guilty parties are not reprimanded or even asked
to cease and desist" from a continuance of the crimes.
"Mrs. Helen B. Covington, of Kensington, Pa. filed a
$150,000 suit in the United States District Court, against Wyeth Inc.
Philadelphia drug manufacturer, charging that an anti-rabies vaccine had
produced paralysis" (The Truth Teller p 26, Aug 1947).
Dr William F Koch (MD, PhD) stated that "THE
INJECTION OF ANY SERUM, VACCINE, OR EVEN PENICILLIN, HAS SHOWN A VERY MARKED
INCREASE IN THE INCIDENCE OF POLIO, AT LEAST 400%. STATISTICS ON THIS ARE SO
CONCLUSIVE, NO ONE CAN DENY IT."
The United States Public Health Bureau is extremely reticent
about reporting diseases caused by vaccination but the report from 1922 to 1931
admitted that there had been 85 cases of post-vaccinal encephalitis,
which DeKruif states "is the twin of infantile
In St. Louis (1933) after a typhoid vaccination campaign
there was an outbreak of encephalitis (a form of polio) in which over 100
died. It was reported that the disease developed about 10 days after vaccination
and in each case vaccinia was indicated in the brain upon postmortem.
In 1926 two prominent English Professors of Pathology, Doctors
Turnbull and McIntosh reported a number of cases of encephalitis
lethargica (sleeping sicknessa form of polio) following vaccination. This led
to the appointment of two commissions of the British Ministry of Health, to
investigate the situation. Their reports published in 1928 revealed that there
had been 231 cases and 91 deaths from this cause (post vaccinal encephalitis) in
England and Wales.
According to a report in the Hobart (Tasmania) "Mercury," (April
111950), "Combined injections for diphtheria and whooping cough may
cause severe cases of infantile paralysis." It stated that a St.
Pancras, London medical officer found 40 cases and that a British Health
Ministry doctor reported 65 cases where paralysis occurred two weeks after
vaccine injections, and in 49 of these, the paralysis was confined to the limb
in which the injection had been given. Two of the cases followed the injection
of penicillin. Dr. J. K. Marlin, from the Guy Hospital reported 80 cases where
children developed infantile paralysis soon after having been vaccinated.
"Mercury" stated that "the doctors realizing the danger of their findings to
the governments diphtheria immunization campaign, withheld publications until
some of the cases could be followed up over a period of many months. Some of the
children recovered after a year or more. Others are still paralyzed . ."
After the many months of observation of these disasters of vaccination the
London County Council finally banned the use of the combined diphtheria
and whooping cough injections in the clinics during the months when infantile
paralysis was most prevalent.
Isnt it appalling that the governments and the serum promoters see
and know that vaccination causes paralysis yet they curtail it only
during the months when polio is most prevalent. They still insist on having the
revenue from the deadly practice the rest of the time regardless of the
consequences. If they would care to observe the "polio season" they would see
that it is only at the times when it is created by the doctors with their
poisoned needles and the people with their excessive eating of sugar
products and other devitalizing and semi-poisoned foods.
Dr. L. C. Appel writes: "The fact that vaccination is either
the (a) adding of a disease to a body already weighted with disease, or else,
(b) the giving of a disease to a perfectly healthy body, is the medical reason
why some of us (medical doctors) oppose vaccination and urge its abolition. A
perfectly healthy body is proof against natural disease; a diseased or unhealthy
body is handicapped by being given another (inoculated) disease. A
diseased or unhealthy body can never be rendered healthy by inoculation or
Dr. Harry R. Baybee said:
"My honest opinion is that vaccination is the cause of more disease
and suffering than anything I could name."
Dr. F. H. Haines voiced his views on vaccination as follows:
"It is impossible to say what remote after-effects may be caused by the
introduction of alien substances into the blood stream. Many nervous and other
disorders of unknown origin are too often met with. Products which alter
metabolism, change the nature of fundamental secretions, cause profound change
in the fluids of the body, allergy and anaphylaxis, are the negation of natures
own methods, and must be viewed with grave misgivings and cautious suspicion."
("The Truth About Vaccination," by Lily Loat)
In an article in Archives of Disease in Childhood, (March, 1950) Dr.
3. K. Martin, of England, gives details of "17 cases of poliomyelitis
which followed 28 days or less after inoculation." Analysis of the cases showed
that 8 of them had been inoculated with A.P.T. Two had other injections against
diphtheria, 2 had penicillin injections, 5 had combined diphtheria and whooping
cough inoculations and 1 had whooping cough inoculations alone.
Not long after these cases had been published it encouraged other doctors to
bring their findings out in the open and several other medical journals in
Australia and England published articles which reported numerous cases of
paralysis following vaccination. Two investigators, Dr. McCloskey,
in Australia and Dr. Geffen in London both observed that "the
point that struck them was that the paralysis started in the limb in which the
injection had been made."
(Details of these findings are reported in the Lancet (London) for
April 8, 1950 and The Medical Officer, for April 8, 1950.)
Two British statisticians were asked to investigate whether or not there
appeared to have been any "Appreciable risk of poliomyelitis following within a
month of inoculation during the 1948 outbreak of polio." The investigators,
Dr. A. Bradford Hill and Dr. I. Knowelden, of the London School
of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, reported:
"The statistics collected in this inquiry reveal clearly an association
between recent injections and paralysis . . . We must conclude that in the 1949
epidemic of poliomyelitis in this country, cases of paralysis were occurring
which were associated with inoculation procedures carried out within the month
preceding the record date of onset of the illness . . ." (Reported in the
British Medical Journal, July 1, 1950)
Although the British government, under the pressure of Socialism has been
forced to make many concessions in favor of the common people such as abolishing
compulsory vaccination, making investigations that revealed the fallacy of many
medical practices etc. Mr. Bevin, speaking in behalf of the
medical fraternity in the House of Commons on November 24, 1947 still tried to
protect the medical rackets when he stated:
"As I am advised, there are no medical grounds for attributing to vaccination
or diphtheria immunization any connection with polio" (infantile paralysis).
The investigations of the Ministry of Health were not in agreement with this
stand as is seen in its statement that "in the last few years there is evidence
that occasionally followed vaccination."
A report in the Lancet (April 8, 1950) stated that Dr.
McClosky of Melbourne had inquired into 340 cases of poliomyelitis
which occurred in Victoria (from January to August, 1949) and found that 31 of
them had occurred in children who had received diphtheria or whooping cough
(pertussis) vaccine, or both, within three months of the onset of the disease.
Of the 31 cases, 30 of them suffered severe paralysis which was most pronounced
in the limb in which the injection was given.
The Medical Officer (April 8, 1950) reported the findings of
Dr. D. H. Geffen who stated that in the first four months of that year,
in St. Pancras, London, 30 children under five developed infantile paralysis
within four weeks of being immunized against diphtheria or whooping cough (or
both) "the paralysis affecting, in particular, the limb of injection. In 7 other
recently vaccinated cases, paralysis occurred but not in the limb that had
received the injection.
Dr. Arthur Gale of the Health Ministry reported (in the
Daily Express for April 10, 1950) that he had observed 65 cases mainly from
the Midlands in which paralysis developed about two weeks after an injection;
and in 49 of these, paralysis was confined to the limb in which the injection
had been given.
The report of the Government investigation (British Medical Journal, July 1,
1950) conducted by Dr. A Bradford Hill and 3. Knowelden revealed that there were
410 cases of infantile paralysis among children under five years. Of these 249
had been inoculated at the same time. Of 41 cases it was not known if they had
been vaccinated or not. Of 35 cases in which poliomyelitis developed within a
month of inoculation, the limb that had received the vaccine was paralyzed. This
was usually the left arm.
The British Medical Journal (July 29, 1950) reported 112 cases of
paralysis admitted to the Park Hospital, London during 1947-1949 in which 14
were paralyzed in the limb "which had received one or more of a course
of immunizing injections within the previous two months. The interval
between the last injection and the onset of paralysis in the majority of cases
was between 9 and 14 days. The paralysis followed (A.P.T.) combined pertussis
(whooping cough) and diphtheria prophylactic in nine cases, pertussis vaccine
alone in one case, and diphtheria prophylactic alone in four cases. The
paralysis, whether of arm or leg, conformed in general to a uniform pattern. It
was not associated in time or place with any particular clinic or technique."
In all 14 cases, paralysis occurred in the injected limb; in 12 cases it was
the arm and in 2 cases, the leg. This outbreak of polio followed an intensive
immunization campaign during that time (1947-1949).
The serum makers probably had a surplus of vaccine to sell, as is the case in
this country (United States) when the scare campaigns are engineered and the
gullible people are stampeded into the vaccination centers to be "shot."
In Los Angeles (1946) after the largest smallpox vaccination campaign in the
history of the city, an epidemic of polio broke out within two weeks after the
"shots" and by the end of the summer there were 26 deaths from this cause and
1,900 reported cases. The County Epidemiologist estimated that there were about
15 times as many unreported cases which would bring the count up to
28,000 cases. The report for the entire United States for 1951 was only 28,395.
An average vaccination campaign nets the doctors about $2,000,000 so this one
must have been tremendous in profits. The amount of the "take" has never been
revealed. This Polio epidemic triggered off a "bigger than ever" March of
Dimes campaign and the people were bled" again for money to support the medical
racket that creates more disease in order to scare the people into more
donations and so the vicious circle continues.
England, Australia and United States are not the only countries that have
found that vaccination causes polio and its variations such as encephalitis,
meningitis, and certain other diseases.
In The New York State Journal of Medicine, (May 15, 1926) reports were
given of post-vaccinal encephalitis in several other countries. In a
brief of an article by Dr. W. F. Winkler, of the University Clinic of Rostock,
Germany it says: "Quite recently isolated cases of cerebral symptoms, suggesting
encephalitis, following vaccination have been reported from Holland,
Czechoslovakia, and Germany and from Switzerland there have been reported two
cases of serious meningitis."
The (Aug. 27, 1928) Report of the League of Nations tells of
139 cases and 41 deaths. "This resulted in Holland stopping compulsory
vaccination during 1928-1929. The total number of vaccinations in Holland in the
first half of 1928 was less than one-third of those for the first half of 1927
and the deaths from encephalitis were reduced to less than one-third."
(Vaccine and Serum Evils Sheltonp. 15)
Germany modified her compulsory vaccination law, as a result of the increased
number of polio cases that developed from vaccination. The International News
Service, (Feb. 27, 1930) states: "The change of attitude of some medical
experts towards vaccination in favor of a less rigid enforcement of the law has
been brought about mainly through a considerable number of post-vaccinal
diseases observed in Holland and England and in sporadic cases in Germany."
Dr. Carl Leiner, of Vienna reported cases of encephalitis and meningitis
developing 9 to 15 days after vaccination. He admitted "that in a generalized
infection, like generalized vaccinia, there may be intracranial complications."
In autopsies, Dr. Lucksch was able to show beyond doubt that "death had been due
to encephalitis." Dr. Bastianse, of the Hague, reported 34 similar cases which
occurred in Holland during 18 months (1924-25) with a death rate of 40%. The
Netherlands, France and other countries have also reported cases of this kind.
In an article in The Journal of the American Medical Association,
(July 3, 1926, p. 45.) on "NERVOUS DISTURBANCES AND SMALLPOX VACCINATION," is
stated, "In regions in which there is no organized vaccination of the
population, general paralysis is rare. In patients with general paralysis,
he (Dr. Daraskwiewiez) has never seen smallpox scars, but smallpox
vaccination scars were always present." Various physicians agreed that,
"It is impossible to deny a connection between vaccination and the encephalitis
which follows it." (emphasis supplied)
In England (1923-1925) an intensive vaccination campaign was carried out
which caused a steady increase in the cases of Encephalitis-Lethargica
and similar diseases until in 1924 there were 6,296 reported cases with
unestimated thousands of unreported cases. Liverpool was at least 50% better
vaccinated than the rest of England and had about 100% more encephalitis. The
physicians tried to direct blame away from vaccination by claiming that the
diseases were due to "latent infection," "inherited weakness," or "special
The word poliomyelitis was coined from the Greek words "polios" meaning
gray, and "myelos" meaning marrow, plus "itis" meaning
inflammation. Thus the word means inflammation of the gray matter of the
spinal cord or brain or wherever gray matter is to be found. Every cell of the
body contains a small amount of gray matter but it is more concentrated in the
brain and spinal cord. Inflammation results from poisoning, irritation and
obstructions that interfere with normal functioning. This damage, decay and
disintegration of cell structure may terminate in paralysis or death without any
invasion of viruses or germs. Isolated germs have never been known to attack
and cause decay and disease of any part of the body. It is the corrosive
poison products of decay that form the body of the vaccine that does the
damage and causes the disease. Germs, bacteria and other such organisms are a
part of decayed substance; they evolve from it and are necessary ingredients in
the life process of eternal change and conversion from one form of life to a
related one. Vaccine poisoning is just one of a number of causes of polio
and other diseases. The section on OTHER CAUSES OF POLIO will deal with the
other main causes. Our concern in this section is to show that viruses do not
Since VIRUS has been medically designated as the "official" cause of polio we
should first of all agree upon some stable definition of the term. Some
dictionaries define virus as a poison. If this were the
accepted definition it would be possible for us to see the connection
between virus and polio. But the physicians and serum makers prefer to imagine a
virus that can fly around in the air and attack people. Any other kind of a
virus could not be made to frighten people into making large donations and in
being vaccinated in the hope of protecting against it. Without an "air-borne"
virus to play with, the whole vaccine racket would collapse. Therefore, the
people are constantly reminded that polio is "catching" and they must have
anti-polio "shots" that are intended to build up "anti-bodies" (which are
also mythical suppositions). Although the promoters of the virus theory of polio
insist that viruses are living organisms that fly around in the air and
cause polio, this has never been proved. This unscientific, unsound, and
undemonstrated virus theory of causation not only has no value, but it
might safely be said that it has had the opposite effect. The rapid and
ungoverned spread of polio is largely due to the misplaced confidence in the
wrong belief. The popular practice of combating a false theory, not only leaves
the disease unchecked but it directs the attention away from the real
causes and discourages true investigation.
The 1940 Medical Dictionary defines virus as "the specific
living principle by which an infectious disease is transmitted."
This definition is vague and meaningless because there is no such thing as a
"living" principle. According to the dictionaries, a principle is a rule,
truth, law etc. and is not a living entity.
The Scientific Encyclopedia says viruses have been obtained
for experimentation by means of extremely powerful centrifuges which must be
specially built. In the same article it is stated that viruses are so small that
they cannot be seen by the most powerful microscopes. Then how do they know they
produced any? - -Or is this game of hide and seek just another means of
using up the millions of dollars contributed to the March of Dimes
The Modern Encylopedia, (1944) says in part "A virus
differs from a bacterium in that the latter can live and reproduce itself
in an artificial culture such as beef broth, whereas a virus must live
inside a living cell. It is because of the protection which the living
cell affords a virus that serums are of no value in the treatment of
This shows us that as far back as 1944 it was known that virus vaccines have
no value in treating disease. Yet these succeeding 10 years have seen more
millions of dollars squandered and more monkeys and other animals and people
tortured and killed and more propaganda built on the false premise that viruses
cause polio, than ever before.
Websters Dictionary refers to virus as a "slimy or
poisonous liquid". Pus is a slimy poisonous liquid and forms where there
is inflammation and disintegration of tissue. This break-down and disintegration
of life cells is not a result of invasion of germs or viruses but is due to the
interference with the chemical balance that holds the structure in a state of
normal functioning. When poisons from such things as vaccines, drugs, narcotics,
contaminated and devitalized foods etc. cause degeneration of the cells and
disease, the condition is usually labeled according to the location of the most
decay. For instance, when there is inflammation of the kidney it is
called Brights Disease; if it is in the joints, it is arthritis, in the stomach
it is ulcers, in the lungs, we call it tuberculosis, in the pancreas, it is
diabetes and when there is inflammation of the brain and spinal cord affecting
the nerves and muscles it is called POLIO.
All cases of polio are not paralytic. Dr. Shelton discusses the subject in an
article titled, DO PHYSICIANS CAUSE INFANTILE PARALYSIS? (Hygienic Review, Dec.
1944) in which he says: "I have never seen paralysis result in cases of
poliomyelitis that had not been treated with drugs . . . They (the physicians)
kill and cripple their patients with their suppressive measures and then blame
the results on the disease or on an unknown virus. The value of the
Kenny treatment is the negative one of being less suppressive and less
destructive than the battle-ax treatment of the medical profession. It does not
cure more, it merely kills fewer."
"In 1908 Dr. Karl Landsteiner, Austrian pathologist,
published his theory, still held today (by backward medical doctors) that it is
a virus that launches epidemic polio. A virus is defined (by him) as a
pathogenic, or disease producing microbe, the poison of a contagious disease.
Landsteiner based his theory on the fact that he had been able to induce polio
in monkeys by injecting them with nerve tissues from fatal human cases.
Believing that the poliomyelitis produced in experimental animals is
pseudo-poliomyelitis produced by Pseudo (false) virus.
Dr. Scobey (in his research) reasoned that the disease they
produced in the monkey was an artificial disease and not a natural illness as it
occurred in man. After exhausting medical literature in the form of
case-histories of the subject in all lands and at all known times of its
appearance, he concluded: (1) It has never been proved that the virus of polio
can cause that disease in human beings; (2) It has been proved that polio
can be caused by cyanide poisoning." (Prevention Magazine, June,
Cyanide is one of the deadly poisons that is permitted to be used in
insecticide sprays on farm produce. It not only poisons the food it is sprayed
on but it is washed by the rains into the soil where it kills the valuable earth
worms and other soil building organisms and renders the farm land sterile and
unproductive. It also washes down into the streams and contaminates the water
supply for both man and animals.
During one of our most widespread polio epidemics (1949) contraction of
polio by definite contact with other victims of the disease was not established
in an elaborate study made by the New York State Health Department. The United
States Public Health Service in its studies also found the same negative answer
during succeeding outbreaks of polio. In short, they learned that the disease
was not contagious." TIME Magazine commented on this unexpected revelation of
these surveys by remarking that "when and where people catch polio remains a
The supposition that viruses entered through the mouth and nose led the
experimenters to make exhaustive tests on both animals and human beings, mostly
prisoners and orphans in institutions. They were exposed (by close association)
to polio patients and their throats and nasal passages were frequently swabbed
with matter (from the patients) that was supposed to contain viruses. No polio
was produced in this way and about the only noticeable after effect was that the
subjects of the experiments lost their sense of taste and smell due to the
damaging effects of the poisons in the serum that was used on the swabs.
In spite of all the proof to the contrary, those who profit by the sale of
vaccines are trying to make their theory stick, but there is dissension and
clash of conflicting belief for lack of facts to depend on
Dr Salks stand on his dead virus theory is reviewed
in LIFE magazine in the article Tracking the Killer in which the writer says
Dr Salk has reason to believe that his killed virus when given m the
prescribed mannerthe third booster shot increases antibodies enormouslymay
even improve on nature" A confused little man with a batch of putrid serum
thinks he can improve on nature
Robert Goglan (in the same article) writes: "Virus diseases,
preventable by vaccination, (?) were found to be ones in which the virus was
blood-borne during some early stage of the infection And this brings us to a
basic dilemma that confronted polio researchers Nobody could find polio viruses
in the blood of the polio victims at any stage"
This is an interesting point because the blood circulates through the body
every three minutes carrying the purified arterial blood to the cells and
carrying away the waste laden blood in the veins to be purified again If viruses
caused polio then there would be some indication of dead viruses
found in the venous blood and live viruses would be found both in and outside of
What started the "dead virus" tangent anyway? It was disastrous effects of
the previous vaccines that were supposed to contain live viruses that
turned the people against this method of mass murder But the one-track-minds of
some of the researchers were determined to hang on to the virus gimmick, whether
alive or dead, so dead virus vaccine was invented
An account of one of the deadly polio vaccine experiments on living human
beings may be found in the Journal of the American Medical Association,
(Dec. 28, 1935,Vol 105 p 2152) The report was made by the Medical
Director of the United States Public Health He says
"During the past year in the United States, several thousand individuals
mostly children, have received subcutaneous and intracutaneous injections of
treated poliomyelitis virus with high fatality" He describes 12 cases of which 6
died within 20 days of receiving the first dose of vaccine. Of the remaining 6
hope of recovery was doubtful. This was from (supposedly) live virus.
Here we see that the doctors were able to cause polio with serum
(protein poisons) but they were not able to cure or control it. The report
continues: "It is believed that, to many physicians, this series of
cases . . . readers undesirable the further use of polio virus for human
The deadly effects of the "dead virus" vaccine of Dr. Salk and the equally
deadly effects of the "live virus" vaccines should close the chapter on polio
vaccine but physicians "die hard" when there are large profits in sight. So a
few of these doctors are still trying to revive the virus corpse by other
concoctions. Dr. Albert Sabin is toying with the idea of a
virus just between the dead and the live variety which according to the U.S.
News and World Report (May 13, 1955) "would be tamedweakened so it
could no longer cause polio but could trigger the body into setting up
protective immunity." (This would be laughable if it were not so pathetic.)
Dr. Richie Russell favors the use of live viruses taken by
mouth instead of injection. He says: "It is certainly more effective than the
Salk method, and may even involve less risk, for should an oral (by mouth)
vaccine lead unexpectedly to a febrile illness, there are still many chances
that no paralytic disease will develop . . . When, however,
poliomyelitis is precipitated by an
inoculation the natural defences of the nervous system seem to
be ineffective, and nearly all such illnesses develop into a paralytic
form of the disease affecting especially the limb used for the injection."
(From"The Story of Salk Anti-Poliomyeitis Vaccine" by Dr. M. Beddow Bayly.)
Dr. Russell admits the danger of injecting poison into the
body and acknowledges the hazards of taking the poison by mouth but suggests
that it would be a little less damaging in this way. This gives a choice of two
risky, worthless methods with no proof of any benefits.
Poison always does serious damage no matter how it is taken, so why nurture
the hope that any special brand of "virus" poison vaccine can ever be
expected to do any good? If the physicians cannot comprehend this simple
fact then the people will need to do their own protecting by avoiding all
vaccines and the rest of the harmful practices of modern medicine.
It gives us hope to find a few doctors here and there who seem to be getting
a clearer understanding of the situation. Among them is Dr. William J.
McCormick who states: (Archives of Pediatrics, Feb. 1950):
"The associated virus is regarded as a biochemical substance produced by the
disease, which, although capable of producing paralysis in experimental animals
by catalytic chemical action in the nervous system, is not necessarily a means
of spreading of the disease under ordinary circumstances."
Ralph R. Scobey, M.D. (Archives of Pediatrics, Sept.-Oct.
1950) tells us that "the so-called virus of poliomyelitis is considered
to be an endogenous (growing from within) substance resulting from poisoning."
He gives evidence in the article to support this claim.
J. E. R. McDonagh (The Universe Through Medicine) states
that "the virus is formed within, and does not come from without."
A UP Release, (Sept. 8, 1950) reports the views of Dr. Joseph Melnick
(at the International Conference of Biology) in these words: "He said studies
have shown that the nucleus of the cells in the spinal cord may be the place
where the polio virus is manufactured when the disease strikes."
The total lack of scientific evidence that viruses cause polio or that
they can exist outside the body and attack from there, has forced the
researchers to look within the cause of disease. When they (the whole
healing profession) fully comprehend this simple fact there will no longer be
any fear of germs and there will be no vaccines, disinfectants or other harmful
germicides used. The healing field can then begin to make rapid advancement and
disease can be understood and eliminated.
It is the blind acceptance of a false theory (of virus attack) that has
promoted ~ and sustained the terrible slaughter of thousands of monkeys to make
a vaccine that can never produce anything but disastrous results.
Even if vaccines were useful, an artificial laboratory disease
induced in a healthy monkey by methods not experienced by man is not a
dependable means of judging the effectiveness of a vaccine in a self induced
cleansing disease of man.
Dr. Jean MacNamara in the Medical Journal, (Aug. 12,
1933) emphasized the danger of applying facts determined in experimental
poliomyelitis in monkeys to the natural disease in man. He pointed out that
there are "marked clinical differences between the pre-paralytic stage of
poliomyelitis in children and in monkeys."
The Lancet (Aug. 19, 1933) discusses this same point by saying: "To
draw analogies between the pathogenesis of poliomyelitis in man and the
experimental disease in monkeys might lead us far astray."
John A. Toomey, M.D.(Science, 82:200. Aug. 30, 1955)
stated that "the intranasal and intracerebral inoculation of the
poliomyelitis virus in monkeys does not produce the same disease seen in man."
In an article in the Journal of Pediatrics, (19:103, 1941) Dr.
Toomey gives evidence to prove that "no animal gets the disease from another no
matter how intimately exposed." For this reason QUARANTINE FOR POLIOMYELITIS IS
Dr. Patrick Meenan, bacteriologist at St. Vincents
Hospital, Dublin, states (Lancet, April 18, 1953) that "most of the recent work
on poliomyelitis has been done on chimpanzees, which seem to react to
infection much as man does." Of course monkeys and other animals suffer
from induced disease the same as people but this has nothing to do with the
cause and cure of disease. This realization is slowly filtering
through the muddled minds of some of the doctors, which gives us some hope.
Dr. Patrick Meenan shows us that he is getting a little closer
to the correct understanding when he says: "The fundamental difficulty is to
know how far experimental findings can be applied to natural infection in man.
What is the relation between the disease in animals produced by large doses of
laboratory adapted strains and that in man produced by small doses of naturally
occurring virus? Is the pathogenesis of poliomyelitis in man the same as in the
Dr. E. R. Krumbiegel, City Health Commissioner of Milwaukee,
Wisc. reported (Sentinal, May 24, 1955) that these tests on monkeys "do
not rule out the possibility that small amounts of weakened polio virus which
will not infect monkey tissues, may still be able to multiply in human tissues .
. . Monkey tissues are not necessarily comparable to human tissues in this
respect. This is exemplified by the fact that the amount of inactivated virus
necessary to produce a good polio response in humans is far less than that
needed in monkeys, and far less in monkeys than in mice."
These two doctors are still floundering around in the delusion of "virus
causation" but they are discovering the fallacies and in time will probably
emerge into the light. When they inject some of the putrefied protein which they
call virusvaccine, into people it takes less of it to produce
toxic poisoning and paralysis than it does in animals. This is not because mans
reaction to germs or viruses is any different from that of animals; it is
because man is already on the border-line of toxemia because of the
incompatible foods and poisons he uses, while the animals that live out in
nature and eat unprocessed foods are strong and more resistant to poisons.
Dr. Alfred Byrne, in a scathing criticism of the Salk
vaccine, in the Spectator for July 22, 1955, stated: "It is known that
the monkey test for the virus is so crude as to constitute a source of danger as
it will not always, by any means, differentiate between the presence of no
live virus and live virus present in small amounts." He recognized
the potential hazards to be so apparent that he considered it remarkable that
there were not considerably more deaths and paralysis from the Salk vaccine. He
wrote: "The deaths might have been multiplied ten or a hundred-fold."
If the complete records were made public we would all be surprised to find
that there are so many more Salk casualties than have been reported.
The U.S. News and World Report (May 13, 1955) in an -article on "Better
Polio Vaccine in Sight" states: "The Salk vaccine, admittedly, offers only
limited protection, though its developer believes it can be improved over the 60
to 90 per cent effectiveness shown by the trials last summer."
There is a wide margin between 60 and 90 per cent. Would any employer hire a
worker who made mistakes 40% of the time and never improved over 90%? Would
anyone run his business with such haphazard results? Yet the parents are urged
to trust the lives of their children in the hands of "Salk serum shooters" whose
most optimistic promise is for only 60 to 90 per cent protection. This
is no protection at all. The protection among the unvaccinated is far
higher than that. This means that out of every 100 who are vaccinated with the
Salk vaccine, 10 can be expected to get polio. For the general unvaccinated
population only one person in 4,000 (in U.S.) is likely to get polio and only
one in 11,000 in England.
How were the percentages of effectiveness arrived at?
An article in LIFE magazine (April 25,) stated: "Although the test had beer
carried out in 44 states, the most dependable results came from 11 in which
200,745 children received three vaccine shots and 201,229 got dummy shots to
serve as a yardstick for the vaccines effectiveness. Ten vaccinated and 68
unvaccinated children caught laboratory confirmed cases of polio. This indicated
(to them) that the vaccine was more than 80% effective."
It is apparent that this is not in any sense a true measurement of the
effective ness of the vaccine. In the first place, if 44 states were tested why
were the figures used in only 11 of them. The statement that they were more
dependable no doubt, means that they were the only ones that were not too
extremely condemnatory. If only the most favorable figures are used in a
test the estimate is not accurate. In the second place, the dummy
shots of colored water are not a fair "yardstick" because injection of
anything at all even distilled water is harmful and often fatal. What was the
coloring matter that was added to the dummy shots? Was it
carbolic acid or mercurochome or was it food coloring which is a coal tar
derivative and condemned as a poison by the Food and Drug Administration?
There was a high percentage of polio among the children vaccinated with the
colored water. Six times more polio was caused by these dummy shots than
by the vaccine. This certainly cannot be accepted by any sane person as
a fair test of the effectiveness of any vaccine. The colored water plus the Salk
vaccine produced far more polio and death per population than we have among the
un-vaccinated masses. All this showed up in spite of their own "hand picked"
records in which only the favorable reports were publicized. The Francis
Report (statistics of the Salk experiment) upon which the effectiveness was
based showed that the Salk vaccine seemed to protect against the paralytic
form of polio in only 30% of the caseson the average. According to that,
70% of those vaccinated could be subject to the worst paralytic form of polio.
On the other hand only one person in 4,571 (in U.S.) gets polio without the
It was never proved that the vaccine gave even the 30% protection.
That was merely assumed from the faulty experiments and the "manipulated"
figures. For instance (Salk Story by Bayly p14), "No case was considered as
immunized unless it had received two shots of the vaccine. This means that a
child developing poliomyelitis after the first inoculation and before the second
one would automatically be placed in the uninoculated class," and would not be
counted as a Salk vaccine casualty even though he died of the "shot". This
probably accounts for the comparatively few deaths that were reported as a
result of the experiment. This would also invalidate all the conclusions
drawn from the figures.
Dr. Salk is reported to have said that "children vaccinated last year should
be given booster inoculations this year." If the full course of shots failed
last year how can they expect some more of the same failure mechanism to
do any better this year?
Although vaccination is one of the quickest and surest ways of getting polio
because poisons are injected directly into the unprotected blood stream, there
are a number of other causes that should not be overlooked. Some of the most
common of these are listed below and discussed briefly in this section:
1Carbohydrates: Sugar products such as ice cream, soft drinks,
desserts, etc. Denatured products such as white flour, alcoholics, etc.
2Cola beverages that contain drugs and sugar.
3Poison sprays on foods, poison preservatives in foods, etc.
4Operations of all kinds, especially removal of tonsils.
5Fatigue and all other practices that deplete the vital energy.
6Negative emotions that generate internal poisons.
7Interference of any kind that impedes circulation or normal
FATIGUE is claimed, by the "virus fans," to lower the energy and let the
viruses attack. Viruses have nothing to do with the cause of polio but
fatigue does in that it generates certain by-products of metabolism that can
result in paralysis under certain conditions.
"According to Professor A.V. Hill, an English physiologist, the direct cause
of the fatigue resulting from muscular effort is the accumulation of lactic
acid, the source of which is glycogen. The body stores up
carbohydrates in the form of glycogen or liver starch, which is used up during
muscular activity. The excessive accumulation of lactic acid in the blood is the
result of an insufficient intake of oxygen by the system. If the iron and sodium
contents of the blood are below normal, due to faulty diet, both the absorption
of oxygen and the discharge of carbonic acid are diminished, lactic
acid then accumulates in the muscles; the latter subsequently stiffen and fail
to functionthe sign of fatigue.
"It is therefore of great importance for athletes and for those who are
subjected to muscular strain, to maintain a high degree of alkalinity of the
blood by avoiding as much as possible, highly acid-forming foods such as meat,
eggs, legumes, breads, fried foods etc., and by consuming an adequate supply of
fruits and green-leaf vegetables. When proper attention is paid to diet, fatigue
is retarded, while endurance is increased. The Japanese, Chinese and some of the
Hindu tribes living in the Himalaya mountains, who subsist on frugal diet and
hardly eat any meat, possess most remarkable physical stamina. These facts are
worthy of careful attention, not only by athletes, but by all who want to derive
much benefit from their regular exercise." (from Vital Facts About Foods" by
Otto Carque p. 22.)
A booklet on "The Prevention of Infantile Paralysis" published by the
National Chiropractic Association discusses the subject of fatigue as
"Naturally, since the body is a very delicately balanced electro-chemical
machine, a disturbance of major calibre is set up when fatigue appears. Let us
quote an authoritative pathologist. There is he says, an excess of waste
matter which accumulates in the muscles, and when this is not quickly washed
away it causes loss of motion to a degree of complete loss of power. If this
point is actually reached, there occurs the escape from the muscles of a rich
liquid protein which results in stiffness and unusability.
"In nerve fatigue, which is brought about by substitution in the nutritive
fluids of poison for oxygen, there occurs a blocking of the nerve impulses from
the spinal cord to the muscles. The immediate effect upon the muscles under
fatigue is to produce slight swelling and rigidity, morbid substances accumulate
from which toxins (poisons) arise. Upon the nerve the immediate effect is to
cause the great cells which preside over those pathways of action to swelljust
as does any injured part. The danger here is, however, that if this swelling is
not promptly reduced and the accumulated fluid dispersed, death of the cell is
assured. Such an eventuality can only be followed by the slow shrinkage of the
muscles served by the nerve with their final and complete loss of power.
"It will be readily seen that in describing the process of fatigue we
have also described a condition very like infantile paralysis."
OPERATIONS, ACCIDENTS AND INJURY "cause changes in the nerve-cells supplying
the part so that they are rendered less able to resist infection" says Dr.
Geffen (Medical Officer of Health for St. Pancras, England.) He observed that
persons contracting polio after appendectomy (removal of appendix) develop
paralysis of the abdominal muscles or even of the muscles of the intestine.
Injection of diphtheria-pertussis vaccine not only localizes the paralysis of
persons infected with virus but also increases the attack-rate. There can be
little doubt, therefore, that even the vaccination of children against
poliomyelitis itself may provide the very conditions which favor an attack and
so increase the incidence to the first injection . . . A child who is injected
three times is at risk three times; there is replication of exposure.
"Persons with bulbar type of polio (an especially fatal type) give a history
of removal of tonsils and adenoids more frequently than do persons with other
forms of poliomyelitis. If a person who has had tonsillectomy develops polio the
likelihood of bulbar involvement is 4 times as great as one where the tonsils
are intact." ("The Salk Story" Bayly. p. 24)
Tonsils and adenoids are part of the lymphatic glandular system of
purification and when they are removed the impurities that they normally handle
are thrown back into circulation and cause all manner of diseases. The poisoning
effects of the anesthetic and the shock of the operation also help to reduce the
vitality and over tax the already poisoned body. The fact that the tonsils are
enlarged and saturated with poison does not indicate that they should be
removed; it merely indicates that the intake of poisons should be discontinued
and the blood stream cleansed by fasting and proper diet. Inflamed tonsils and
practically all other abnormal conditions heal themselves when the obstructions
SUGAR is at last being recognized as a destroyer of health rather than an
article of food as was formerly believed. Technically white sugar (C12H220
11) is classified as a drug and not as a food. Natural sugar in fruit is in a
balanced combination with other constituents that enable it to be assimilated
without damage but when it is separated into the white, crystalline carbon
substance called sugar it is converted into alcohol almost immediately
after it is taken into the body and does the same damage that alcohol does. It
dehydrates the cells and leeches the calcium from the nerves, muscles, bones,
teeth and all tissues that are supplied with calcium and other alkaline
elements. A serious calcium deficiency is a forerunner of polio. This deficiency
cannot be adequately balanced by taking calcium tablets or bone meal but must
have the proper balance of other minerals and life elements necessary to enable
it to assimilate in the body. Certain green vegetables contain the calcium in
proper balance. Some of these will be listed under the topic heading WHO CAN
Dr. Benjamin P. Sandler, of North Carolina called attention
to the relationship between polio and the excessive use of sugar and refined
starches such as white flour products and processed corn meal. He compiled
records showing that in the countries such as United States, Britain, Australia,
Canada and Sweden which have an extremely high per capita consumption of sugar
(around 108 pounds per person) there is also a high incidence of polio. On the
other hand, polio is practically unknown in China with its sugar consumption of
only 3 pounds per person per year.
The summer months are the months of the highest sugar intake in the form of
ice cream, bottled drinks, candy, desserts etc. and it is no coincidence that it
is also the time when polio is at its height.
During one of North Carolinas worst polio epidemics (1948) Dr. Sandler
publicized a diet program to control the disease. Polio had increased so rapidly
all summer that by October there were 2,403 cases in that state. All the usual
medical methods had failed and the hopelessness of this terrifying epidemic
shocked the people into a willingness to listen to something as unorthodox as
diet to control disease. Dr. Sandier warned the people against all sugar
products such as ice cream, cola drinks, all fountain drinks, and many other
popular but harmful foods. The people were advised to eat vegetables, especially
greens, ripe natural fruits, (unsweetened) whole grains and plain, wholesome
The ice cream sales dropped off to such an extent that "one producer shipped
one million less gallons of ice cream during the first week following the diet
story release." Within 72 hours polio had declined considerably and the epidemic
was brought under control. By the next year the polio incidence of that state
had dropped 90%.
(1) "Cola is loaded with habit-forming caffeine so that once the
victim gets accustomed to the stimulant, he cannot very well get along without
it." says Dr. Royal Lee, of the Lee Foundation for Nutritional
Research. "There is only one reason for putting caffeine in a soft drinkto make
it habit forming. Dr. H. W. Wiley (former director of the Food and Drug
Administration) was right when he said it was against any food law to add it to
a drink." Dr. Wiley was fired when he exposed the racketeers. Other men were
hired who yielded to the pressure. In some states it is against the law to sell
a product of that kind and Wisconsin is one of them. The labeling law requires
most manufacturers to list on the label all the ingredients (especially poison
drugs) but the Cola companies get around this law and list nothing on the label.
Cola is not a food but a poison, and yet it is advertised as a drink suitable
A bottle of Cola contains about as much caffeine as a strong cup of coffee.
Caffeine is not only a habit forming drug but it is destructive to the tissues
of the stomach, eyes, nerves and kidneys. In fact there is not a part of the
body that is not injured by this drug. It makes the children (and all who drink
it) nervous, irritable and high strung and leads to a desire for stronger drink
(2) Cola drinks contain as much as 10% sugar which is 9
times more than the body can metabolize.
(3) Colas contain artificial coloring and flavoring matter. These coal
tar products are harmful drugs and have no place in the diet.
(4) The most damaging ingredient in cola drinks is the PHOSPHORIC ACID.
This acid is a destroyer of the vital calcium supply in the body and even
dissolves the enamel on the teeth. Phosphoric acid is made by treating phosphate
rock with sulphuric acid.
The corrosive effect of colas on the teeth was noticed more than 12 years ago
and experiments to prove this were begun during World War II at the Naval
Research Institute and later were continued at Cornell University under a grant
from the Office of Naval Research. Professor Clive McCay of Cornell made this
"At the Naval Research Institute we put human teeth in cola beverage and
found that they softened and started to dissolve within a short period. They
be-came soft within two days.
"In the intervening years, 1943-1950, we made numerous studies of the effect
of these cola beverages upon the teeth of rats, dogs and monkeys. We have
published data indicating that the molar teeth of rats are dissolved down to the
gum line if the rats are well fed but given nothing to drink except cola
beverage for a period of 6 months." (Journal of Nutrition, 1949 Vol. 39, p 313)
"McClure and Restarski report the decalcifying effects of
acid soft drinks (such as cola drinks), rendering the tooth surface more
susceptible to bacterial attack. They point out that enamel is most readily
soluble in phosphoric acid (in cola drinks) exceeded only by solubility
in nitric acid. Restarski reports a popular cola drink to contain 0.055
per cent by weight phosphoric acid and to have a pH of 2.6. This is considerably
more than 100 times more acid than will decalcify enamel under normal mouth
conditions." (From an article by Dr. Allison James, published by The Lee
Foundation for Nutritional ResearchNo. 42)
"Phosphoric acid will break down the body lecithin, cause brain fag,
neurasthenia, nerve breakdown, physical apathy, mental irregularities; anemia,
polycythemia, acidosis, renal (kidney) lesions, rickets, faulty calcification, a
marked shift in the bone structure, unsuccessful reproduction, tetany and
prevents the normal increase in size of growing children. It will inhibit all
basic alkaline salts in their normal functions. It will attack the teeth and all
"Polio blood is low in calcium and invariably low in iron . . . The free
phosphoric acid in Cola could tie up iron, calcium, manganese and
probably all the respiratory metals. When they can no longer function in the
action of enzymes, cells cannot generate or regenerate and this results in
decomposition of body proteins that manifests itself in POLIO. Phosphoric acid
slowly kills the life principle." (Duon MillerPolio Prevention, Inc.)
From Polio Prevention, Inc., we get this data: "Miscarriages are 600%
and premature births 400% more common among poorly fed mothers." This same
nutritional deficiency also causes suffering at childbirth, menopause, and the
monthly periods. Normal, healthy women do not suffer at these times. Under our
present faulty health (?) education system the normal person is the
exception rather than the rule. In her remarkable book "TOKOLOGY" Dr. Alice B.
Stockhani describes a simple diet and health regimen that enables the mothers to
have quick and painless childbirths without drugs, hypnosis or hospitalization.
According to a survey made by the state college of Pennsylvania, MALNUTRITION
HITS 999 PERSONS OUT OF 1,000. This indicates that a drastic change is needed in
our health training and national leadership.
The development of an unborn child requires an abundance of mineral elements,
especially calcium, that must be drawn from the mothers body to form j the bony
structure and entire body of the infant. A healthy woman has a surplus of these
vital elements which nature draws upon at such times. But when the mother is
depleted and has no surplus building material, the new life forming, must draw
these minerals from her nerves, muscles, glands bones, blood and wherever the
vital substance can be found. This extra drain on her body reserves may leave
her muscles, nerves and vital centers too impaired for normal functioning and
polio may be the result. If she is unfortunate enough to be taken to the
hospital and given the drugs, iron lung and devitalizing hospital diet she may
be crippled for life but if she stays home and lives a healthful life the
deficiency may, in time be normalized and recovery can take place.
The very foods that cause acidosis (the forerunner of polio) are
served in the hospitals to the polio patients
The following diet of devitalized, disease producing foods is typical of what
I~ being served to the patients in the medical hospitals This was actually taken
from the menu of a POLIO Ward. It is no wonder that so many die or fail to
Pint of pasteurized milk (which is putrefactive and deficient in
calcium.) Canned orange juice (extract with white sugar and water added.) Dry cereal (processed chaff with all the vital elements removed and
poison preservatives added. White sugar and cream on cereal (sugar is a drugslow alcohol.) White bread and butter (Actual experiments on "death penalty" criminals
showed that 30 days on white bread and water killed more men than 30 days on
water alone. In fact, none died on water.) Coffee served to older patients, cocoa to children. Both coffee and cocoa
contain harmful alkaloids, caffine, theobromine, tannin, theme, etc. Coffee cakemade with white flour, white sugar, indigestible shortening,
poison dough conditioners, salt, etc.
Parents and friends came and brought ice cream and candy which the patients
were permitted to eat.
This was even worse. Meat (fried chicken in this case. All fried foods are difficult to digest
and all meats including fish and chickens are highly acid forming.) Gravygreasy, pasty and acid forming. Mashed potatoesPeeled, boiled potatoes have lost their valuable
minerals. What remains is acid forming starch. Beets in vinegar. Vinegar is an irritating acid, a denatured product that
interferes with digestion. White rollssame as white bread. More coffeewhite sugar and cream.
DINNER: MeatAnactive person can metabolize only one and a half
ounces of protein a day. Inactive patients are further poisoned by extra
protein. White ricePolished rice is stripped of its outer coatings of mineral
elements and vitamins that help to balance the starch in the center. This
processing makes the rice acid forming and devitalizing. ice CreamThis is one of the guilty offenders in causing polio,
because of the high sugar content and preservatives, fillers, artificial
flavoring and coloring, etc. Coffee or milk again. Patients were forced to eat when not hungry.
This diet looks like a conspiracy to keep the patients sick
for the added business it brings the doctors.
According to a survey made in 1946 regarding the percentage of polio
recoveries under the various methods of healing we have this interesting report:
91 % to 100% recover under certain Chiropractic treatment(not all
chiropractors understand this method)
97% to 100% recover under correct Hygienic treatment.
72% under Nurse Kenny treatment.
35% recover with no professional care.
17% under medical care.
Some doctors are actually advising their pregnant patients to drink several
bottles of cola each day for nausea. Duon Miller, founder of Polio Prevention
Inc. met one of these medically misinformed women and he told her about the
harmful effects of cola drinks and other such drinks but the woman said, "You
are no doubt right, but my doctor has advised me to drink it so Im going to
follow the doctor." Cola makes "drug addicts" of its customers so she
probably couldnt quit anyway.
She continued her poison diet and when her baby was born it was
malformed without any complete fingers or toes. The poisons in the cola had
robbed it of the necessary minerals to build a normal body. It will have to go
through life as a helpless cripple, dependent on the public as thousands of
others have to do because certain physicians and manufacturers want to make
"Any doctor who will suggest to a pregnant woman that she drink "cola" or
suggest that a child of any age drink "colas" should be disbarred by the Medical
Association and given the rest of his life to realize that the letters "M.D."
after his name actually mean "Mentally Deficient." (Duon Miller)
Doctors from the University of Pennsylvania Medical School undertook a study
of the prenatal diets of mothers who had given birth to 45 children so malformed
that 90% were born dead or died within a year after birth. The diets of these
women were found to have been deficient in practically every nutrient." (from
"Lets Have Healthy Children"Adelle Davis. p. 18-19)
Dr. Joseph C. Risser, in a broadcast on the subject of
NUTRITION AND HEALTHY BONES stated:
"Delay in development of fragmentation of bone growing centers, porous or
soft bone, are commonly seen in X-ray of recent POLIO patients. These X-ray
evidences, having appeared long before the attack of polio, strongly indicate
that in the polio patient there was a pre-existing state of malnutrition."
Ralf R. Scobey, M.D., president of the Poliomyelitis
Research Institute. Inc. Syracuse, New York (in the Archives of Pediatrics,
Sept. 1950) lists 170 diseases of polio-like symptoms and effects but
with different names such as: epidemic cholera, cholera morbus, spinal
meningitis, spinal apoplexy, inhibitory palsy, intermittent fever, famine fever,
worm fever, bilious remittent fever, ergotism, etc. There are also such
common nutritional deficiency diseases as beriberi, scurvy, Asiatic
plague, pellagra, prison edema, acidosis etc. No drugs, medicines or
medical treatments have ever been able to cure any of these diseases and no
germs have been isolated as the cause. But they all respond to fasting,
cleansing, proper diet and improved circulation. The similarity of these
diseases to polio is too obvious to go unnoticed. They are, in reality, all one
disease with varying stages of intensity and different names. It is ridiculous
to assume that polio is caused by a virus and the rest of them are caused by
nutritional deficiency. Dr. Scobey senses this fact when he states: "Inasmuch as
nerve cells react in much the same way to various poisons, further research will
probably show that in these cases polio micro-organisms are not always present,
but intoxication (poisoning) may be produced through faulty metabolism or by the
absorption of poisons from without."
There are literally thousands of cases in which beriberi, scurvy, polio,
pellagra, etc. have developed among arctic explorers, sailors, construction
gangs, prisons and every other group where the people try to live on an
unbalanced diet of starch, protein, coffee and devitalized, processed foods.
Alfred McCann describes many of these (poison squads) in his book THE SCIENCE OF
EATING. In the case of the German crew on the "Kronprinz Willem" when the ships
hospital was filled with helpless sailors and more were dropping on the deck
each day the German and American doctors exhausted all their skill (such as it
was) but the condition grew steadily worse. The men had polio but all the
doctors had a different name for it. They thought the disease was contagious and
the ship lay in quarantine in an American harbor. When all the medical methods
had utterly failed, Mr. McCann went aboard and gave the captain a simple diet
which was followed out and it brought about recovery of most of the patients
within 10 days. The rest of them were well in record time. Not a man was lost.
On the other hand, when the workmen on the South American railroad began
collapsing with the same deficiency disease, the doctors failed (as usual) and
there was no "health" man to give them a diet so 4,000 of them died. Viruses,
germs or bacteria did not cause these epidemics. The men were stricken with
acidosis from malnutrition. They suffocated in their own internal poisons. They
had the fever, the swelling, the sore throat, the lack of coordination of
muscles and finally paralysis the same as our present polio patients.
When will our blundering physicians ever learn to profit by the experiences
of the past instead of torturing animals and experimenting on and killing people
in a effort to learn something that is already known?
In addition to the drastic vaccine poisons and the self generated poisons
from wrong foods there are a number of other poisons that are being freely used
that are known to cause polio.
INSECTICIDES such as lead arsenate, hydrocyanic gas
and other cyanide compounds, DDT, parathion and other deadly
poisons are a constant cause of death and disease. Dr. Abraham Gelperin,
director of the Bureau of Communicable Diseases and assistant Clinical Professor
or Public Health at Yale University, stated flatly that he believes many ills to
be the result of these poison insecticides, and that large numbers of what are
believed to be polio are in reality cases of poisoning, possibly caused
by something like parathion.
Dr. J. W. Norton of the N. C. Department of Health said the
"symptoms of parathion poisoning are similar to those of polio,
including headache, gastric upset, giddiness, tightness of the chest, vomiting
and sometimes diarrhea.
"One of the manufacturers of the widely used insecticide parathion
describes it as capable of producing severe systemic toxic effects and death in
animals and man either by oral administration, inhalation of mists, dusts, or
vapors and by absorption through the unbroken skin." (PreventionJune, 1950. p.
What are our elected officers and public protectors doing while all this
wholesale poisoning is going on? Are the over-wealthy manufacturers the
only ones to be "protected" in their game of "grab and stab"?
FORMALDEHYDE IN MILK has been reported as a cause of polio.
Australian Medical Gazette, (Aug. 24, 1897) states that "formalin,"
an aqueous solution of formaldehyde, caused paralysis in some who drank milk
that contained it. Our U.S. Government permits the dairymen to add formaldehyde
to milk so that stale, inferior milk may be sold as fresh milk. Formaldehyde is
a poisonous embalming fluid that is, no doubt, one of the causes of the
epidemics of diarrhea and death among the bottle fed infants in hospitals.
The Lancet (Jan. 9, 1915) mentions an epidemic of polio that was said
to have been caused by raw milk. It has never been. proved that raw milk
has ever caused polio or undulant fever or any other disease but the added
poison preservatives could cause many diseases. Pasteurization companies
capitalized on this incident to stampede some laws into operation which would
prohibit the sale of raw (unprocessed) milk. Pasteurization makes matters even
worse because the heating process melts the butterfat in the milk and this coats
the calcium globules and renders the calcium inassimilable to a large extent.
From the Journal of Biochemistry, (Vol. 75, pp. 251-62. Oct., 1927) we
read: "In the Nutrition Laboratory of the Dept. of Home Economics of the
University of Chicago, in 1927, experimentation revealed that only about 27% of
the calcium in pasteurized milk and 30% of evaporated milk was
retained in the body."
Rats fed on pasteurized milk grew at only half the normal rate and developed
various ailments and died early. Calves fed on pasteurized milk died before
maturity in 9 out of 10 cases.
Dr. Royal Lee of the Lee Foundation of Nutritional Research,
"I offer the sum of $1,000 to anyone who can offer evidence acceptable to the
average jury that pasteurization has not affected the nutritional values of milk
to the extent that it is incapable of maintaining the tooth and bone structures
of the test animals."
The Salk vaccine also has formaldehyde added to the poison decomposed
protein from which the vaccine was made, which adds to its toxicity.
MERCURY, which is freely used in the practice of medicine, especially in the
treatment of venereal diseases, is reported to have caused many cases of polio.
"Gonorrhea the crippler" is an advertising "scare head" term that is used
to terrorize "suspects" into the treatment offices. The crippling is usually
done by the treatment and not the disease itself. On a simple fasting and
correct diet program the disease heals the same as other conditions, when not
interfered with by suppressive medical measures.
SOLANIN, a poison that is formed in frozen potatoes was found to be the cause
of an epidemic in Ireland. The disease had polio-like reactions but was
called remittent fever. Old, sprouting potatoes and those that have been
exposed to the sun in the growing period until the skin was green were also
found to -contain this toxic substance. -
UNRIPE FRUIT and ERGOT from some types of rye have caused gastrointestinal
disturbances which affected the nerves, spinal cord and brain and caused a form
of polio. A diet excessively high in grains (especially milled grains) has been
followed -by deficiencies that terminated in polio as was reported by Stockman
and Johnson in the Journal of Nutrition, (Nov., 1934).
NEGATIVE EMOTIONS such as fear, anger, hatred, jealousy,,
anxiety etc. release adrenaline or generate other poisons that irritate the
nerves or impede circulation and poison the cells just the same as injected
poisons. The- fear of polio or any other disease can help to develop it. On the
other hand a clean body and happy state of mind can help immunize against it.
In the very early days when bread was made from freshly ground whole grains
it could rightly be called the staff of life because it could sustain
life. But our present day commercialized bread is stripped of its vital life
elements when the heart, the germ and the outer coatings with all the valuable
minerals are removed in the milling and processing of the flour. In addition to
this devitalizing step, four poisons are added to make a defective
product salable, (1) Agene a bleach as poisonous as Clorox or any other wash-day
chlorine bleach is added to flour to make it whiteras if that matters. Dr.
Scobeys research department states that "It has recently been discovered that
white bread, which has been treated with the bleaching agent nitrogen
trichioride, (agene) produces in dogs epilepsy identical with the human
disease . . . The disease in dogs has been described in the past as canine
hysteria, (rabies) running fits, or fright disease and it was attributed by
some scientists to an infectious agent, possibly a virus. . ." The poisoning
is obvious and yet they try to blame the condition onto a virus. (2) Poison
insecticides are added to keep the bugs out. The bugs are the lesser of the two
evilsthey are not poison and they are large enough to be seen and can be
avoided but the poison is invisible. This poison in bread has been found to
cause paralysis of the hind legs in experimental dogs. Because whole wheat
flour is more nourishing and therefore more attractive to insects, about
four times as much of -the insecticide is added to this flour. Most of
the Health Food Stores carry unprocessed flour and bread. If "safe" bread
is not available people should grind their own flour or avoid bread. (3) Alum
and other harmful dough conditioners are added to bakers bread. (4) When the
natural vitamin B is removed from the flour and the synthetic vitamin
B is added the advertisers claim it is "enriched" with vitamin B; but it
is actually poisoned by this coal tar product that is not a true vitamin. In
Canada it is a prison offense for a miller or a baker to add synthetic vitamin B
to any product intended to be used for food.
According to the report of the Surgeon General, "In 1945 there were 246 cases
of polio with 52 deaths among American Troops in the Philippines." This
is just a small representation of the over-all picture of polio throughout our
entire armed forces. They did not have any indication of polio when they were
inducted and they went to areas where there was no polio so it cannot be blamed
on contagion or viruses or any of the usual excuses. Polio is a man-made
disease. The soldiers were first poisoned with all the vaccines invented by
modern medical voodooism. Then they had free cigarettes, with their 18 poisons,
pressed upon them and plenty of beer, cola, candy, devitalized processed foods,
ice cream, drugs and everything that destroys health. An article in
Prevention magazine, June, 1951 says:
"All during the war, as soon as local combat conditions permitted, ice cream,
soft drinks, candies, etc. became available to American troops. Ice cream
manufacturing equipment followed soon after combat equipment. I saw American
troops consume great quantities of candy bars when they lost their appetites for
the army diet." As a result, polio, insanity and all the diseases known to man
developed among the soldiers more rapidly than among the 4Fs who were too
defective to go to war.
Although the real cause and cure of polio is obvious, the promoters of polio
find it more profitable to "look" for a cure than to "find" it. The March of
Dimes millions would cease to flow into their pockets if they ever were to
find the cure. Therefore, they keep up the pretense of lookingbut always
in a direction where they are sure not to find the answer.
(1) At first they tried the polio serum and when they found it killed
the people but did not stop polio they tried something else just as far away
from the solution as they could get.
(2) They sprayed towns, crops and orchards with deadly poison DDT
insecticide, suggesting that polio might be caused by flies. The
chemical companies reaped the benefits but the orchards were seriously damaged,
crops were ruined and people were killed by this wild and unwarranted
experiment. An article on polio in "Your Health" magazine (1954,
Fall Quarter, p. 69) comments on the fly situation by saying that in "Iceland
where there are no flies . . there have been polio epidemics.
Experiments on eliminating flies by spraying whole communities with DDT have not
had any effect in combating epidemics."
The American Weekly(1945) in an article titled, "War from the Air on
Infantile Paralysis" states that "if the city-wide experiment with polio proves
that flies carry the disease . . . the city officials are likely to agitate for
. .. spraying of DDT from the air. . . This step might eliminate flies . . . but
at the same time it. would kill bees and butterflies, and many crops might fail
because of lack of pollination.. . The important thing now is to find out
whether polio flies in with the fly." But they did not bother to wait for this
proof. They didnt consult the people as to whether they were willing to be
subjected to this mass poisoning; they just moved in with their full scale
poisoning of the air, earth and vegetation.
GAMMA GLOBULIN was the next hoax to be foisted on the ever
trusting public. United Press (Sept. 20, 1953) reported: "Efforts to
control polio, complete failure, according to the United Nations WORLD HEALTH
ORGANIZATION COMMITTEE, which condemned mass use of Gamma Globulin or any large
scale intra-muscular injections."
Polio Prevention Inc. states: "The United States Army does not use Gamma
Globulin and has discontinued the use of blood plasma because of damage to the
An article in Herald of Health magazine (April, 1955) says:
"Two years ago the Country was all stirred up about the possibilities of
Gamma Globulin. This Gamma Globulin was a derivative of the great stores of
diseased human blood plasma which was bursting the seams of the various blood
"The doctors of the army, navy and marine corps had refused absolutely to
shoot this putrid plasma into the bodies of wounded service men. They declared
it was too disease-ridden to use on our heroes in uniform but such
characterization of the filthy stuff did not deter medical men, from
proclaiming it entirely suitable to go into the clean blood streams of the
The Los Angeles County Health Index (for the week ending May 23, 1953)
states: (a) Evidence indicates that gamma globulin does not prevent paralysis
from occurring in all cases. (b) There is evidence that it is of no value in the
treatmónt of poliomyelitis after symptoms have been recognized. (c) The partial
protection afforded by gamma globulin is only temporary lasting only five to six
For a Public Health Department that is over-ridden by the medical trust, to
make these concessions indicates that the situation was much worse than that.
There was no protection at all and no benefit but it was used because it was a
In Key West, Florida when a few of the people learned of the
plan to poison the city with this self-condemned product they started a protest
and circularized literature giving the facts about it. But the promoters of
gamma globulin induced the City Manager and the Police Dept. to arrest anyone
protesting or handing out literature unfavorable to their serum. Miami
Herald, Miami, Florida (Sept. 30, 1953) reported:
"Dr. Carl Bernet, of United States Public Health Service
says: Gamma Globulin is not a cure or preventive of polio. Key West is
getting the Gamma Globulin because there is an extra supply." Is this
a land of liberty or just a page out of the Dark Ages?
CURARE, which is arrow poison used by the Indians of the
Amazon is used on polio patients. A doctor in the Los Angeles Health Department
told me that this drug does not decrease the pain of the polio patients but it
makes them unable to move or scream and they experiment on them then. Many of
the patients die under the intense pain of this torture treatment.
THE PRECAUTIONS that the polio foundation give to the public
have no effect at all on controlling polio. What good does it do to warn people
to (1) wash their hands, (2) stay out of swimming pools, (3) stay away from
polio patients, (4) call a doctor when symptoms appear etc. when the disease is
n~ caused by viruses but is caused by body poisoning? Why call a doctor who
admits he does not know the cause or the cure? All these misleading instructions
stand in the way of healing.
THE SALK VACCINE is just another failure mechanism because
it, too, is wandering blindly in the wrong direction and is spreading disease
rather than curtailing it and is killing rather than curing.
Many doctors, and public authorities as well as individual laymen are not
only questioning the safety of the Salk vaccine but are denouncing it. Even the
Journal of the American Medical Association in a recent (1956) "Report on
Rate of Use of Poliomyelitis Vaccine" expresses concern about the dropping off
of sales of this product in the "announcement by the Public Health Service that
states are not using their vaccine supplies at the rate the serum is being
Approximately 45% of the 7,000,000 cc had been used . . . Dr. Scheele
asked all concerned to use supplies as rapidly as possible . . ." He
said, "This is the ideal time for vaccinations. The safety and effectiveness of
the vaccine are well established."
Imagine, a public officer making a statement like that after all the deaths
caused by the blood poisoning vaccine. By saying that "this is the ideal time
for vaccinations" he probably means that they better get their multi-billion
dollar supply of vaccine sold before all the people wake up. Most of them are
still iii the hypnotic stupor of the high pressure advertising of the past year
and a half.
"EFFICIENCY OF THE SALK SERUM QUESTIONED" is the title of a headline in a
Chicago newspaper. Excerpts are as follows: "CHICAGO, Nov. 11 (AP)A doctor said
today that not all public health physicians are certain that the Salk polio
vaccine program is on a solid and secure scientific footing."
"Dr. Herbert Ratner, health commissioner of suburban Oak Park and editor of
the Bulletin of the American Association of Public Health Physicians,
asserted that public statements have mostly favored the Salk program to the
exclusion of unfavorable items.
"He listed these items, among others:
"1English Authorities in July, 1955, canceled the Salk vaccine
programs as too dangerous.
"2All European countries, with the exception of Denmark, have
discontinued their programs. Even Denmark is reported to have
found live virus in the Salk Vaccine.
"3Canada decided, as of July 29, 1955, to postpone its vaccination
program until the early part of 1956, to take advantage of the expected advances
in the development of safe and effective poliomyelitis vaccine." (Since there is
no such safe vaccine, what they are really waiting for is to see what is going
to happen to the millions of American children who have been brutally sacrificed
to the "money mad" vaccine experiment. None of these other countries want to
waste their children on such risky and haphazard experiments.)
"4Two Nobel Prize winners, Dr. John Enders and Dr. Wendell M. Stanley,
both have publicly indicated their uncertainties about the Salk vaccine
"5The Polio Advisory Committee and health officials of at least one state,
Massachusetts, have advised against public inoculations and have withheld
approval of the use of the vaccine until at least Jan. 1, 1956.
"6One of the two major pharmaceutical houses connected with the production of
Salk Vaccine since the 1954 field trials has recently found it necessary
to withdraw their product from the market."
Why pick on just one drug company; they are all guilty. In "DREW PEARSONS
MERRY-GO-ROUND" the writer states: "Other drug companies, with the exception of
Park Davis, have not experienced so many seizures (by the Food and Drug
administration, for violation of law). Park Davis has had nine
civil suits, Eli Lilly two, Pitman Moore two,
Wyatt three, Sharp and Dohme four,
Cutter nine." He also tells us that "The Public Health Service
which is testing and licensing the Salk Vaccine has not had time to test
it, but has accepted the written reports of the drug companies." In a
life and death matter such as this with millions of people involved and future
generations threatened by disease and impairment from vaccine poisoning, why
havent our paid public officials had time to test the vaccine? Can the
manufacturers who are in the business for profit be expected to tell the truth
about the productwhen the truth would condemn them?
"SALK SHOTS OPEN NEW DRUG MARKET" is the front page headline in an
independent newspaper (The American RallyApril 1955) In the opening paragraphs
"ANN ARBORWith the pomp of a Presidential inauguration and the ballyhoo of a
Hollywood premiere, the big drug houses have unleashed upon the public their
infamous campaign in behalf of the Salk vaccine. Using the general anxiety
concerning polio, this conspiracy now aims to inject this dubious serum into the
bloodstream of every child in the United States.
"Thus, a new major industry has been activated. Estimated to gross over
5 billion dollars in its first year of wholesale operation,
combining the revenue of the Chemical Trust and doctor fees and advertising,
this new development will make Dr. Jonas Salk, its promoter, the Henry Ford of
the mass production needle-pushing racket.
"The American Rally warns against the mass inoculations being planned. It
is felt by many authorities that this Salk campaign is a run-away experiment in
totalitarian health (?) powers which will bring disaster to the children
involved. No objective standards were employed in determining either the safety
or the efficiency of the serum.
"The Salk experiment is based on false premises and refuses to deal with
original causes of polio. From the basis of a fictitious virus the vaccinators
are using other poisons over which they have little control. In their mad
scramble to launch a new money-making empire, it appears they are willing to
guinea pig America to death.
"American Rally proposes an open-forum, impartial, qualified and
independent authority which can sit in judgment over such propositions. The
Nation desperately requires a HALL OF SCIENCE separate from both government and
commercial monopoly, which can protect the public interest."
This is a very good idea but I wonder how long we could keep it free from
politics and the money trusts.
Morris A. Beale, in his book of startling facts titled THE
DRUG STORY tells us that "disease is more rampant because of commercial greed.
When the Rockefeller-Standard Oil crowd muscled into the drug and pharmaceutical
business in such a big way, scientific medicine (if there is such a thing) was
turned into a racket which shortened many American lives from ten to twenty
The $446,837,527 subsidy parceled out to medical colleges by the Rockefeller
Foundation to mis-educate medics into the excessive use of drugs, vaccination
and immunization which are making invalids of millions. It tells of the
$10,000,000,000 traffic in death and disease. . . One pharmaceutical houses
profit of 635 per cent on its assets in one year . . . panhandling rackets in
cancer control and allied frauds. . . appointments by Rockefeller Center of all
key personnel in Government health set-ups. . . government gangsters in the Food
and Drug Administration, Post Office, Army, Navy and Public Health Offices etc..
. . dangerous doses . . . protected shakedown. . . and the Drug Chamber of
Commerce." Truth Teller Magazine.
In spite of the medical domination that prevented the newspapers and radios
from advertising his book, its popularity spread so fast among the people who
were starved for truth that within six months six large printings had to be made
and it is still a big seller among health minded people.
When President Eisenhower took it upon himself to filch $30,000,000 from the
deceived taxpayers in order to help force more poison vaccine into the resisting
children, the American Medical Association, with its machinery geared to money
making, raised its loud voice in opposition, because it was not getting all the
fees. The Bulletin of the National Health Federation (March, 1956)
The A.M.A., however, recently attacked the public health officials as
violating the principles of free enterprise in medicine. The House of
Delegates of the A.M.A. is demanding that all free inoculations stop and
that the task be turned over to the doctors on a fee basis..
This gives us an idea of what American Free Enterprise means. It
merely means that the trusts are tree to exploit the people and if
someone else wants to do the samethe fight is on.
If someone wants to stop the exploitation and warn the people, the money
trusts in power "squelch" themif they can.
In 1946, during one of our most serious polio epidemics in Los Angeles, I
wrote a book called POLIO CONTROL in which I denounced the "virus theory" and
named vaccination as one of the causes of polio. The medicodrug trusts had
their stooges working for two years trying to get something legal on which to
put the book out of circulation. I had had a lawyer go over the manuscript
before I had it printed and I had the Post Office examine the printed book to be
sure it was in order and nothing was said that was against the law. The lawyer
said, "The book is dynamite but its well documented and entirely within the
law." When the "medical opposition" couldnt get anything on me lawfully they
used unlawful measures and had their stooges in the Post Office bar the book
from the mails. No jury trial was permitted and no testimony of mine was
accepted. Their charge was that the "book was dangerous because it
disagreed with accepted medical belief." So the book went out of
circulation, but not before two editions had been sold to all parts of the
worldmostly to drugless doctors.
The medical trust, through their hirelings in the Better Business Bureau, had
not let the newspapers sell me even one inch of advertising space for fear the
people would learn the truth. One of the large newspapers in Los Angeles said to
me, "We think you have a good book but our hands are tied; if you can get the OK
of Mr. Sample of the Better Business Bureau we can take your ad." When I talked
to Mr. Sample and "downed" all his arguments with proof of the damage done by
vaccination and all the case histories of polio from vaccination etc. he merely
said, "If youre right then a lot of other people are awfully wrong." But he
still refused to allow the papers to advertise my book.
The years went by and many doctors in various parts of the world, England,
Australia, France, United States, etc. learned that viruses did not cause polio
and that the disease occurred in patients soon after vaccination, and in the
limb in which the injection had been given. Many lives would have been saved if
my book could have reached the people. But selfish medical interests destroyed
it because of information that has since then been proven to be true. Its hard
to say what they will try to do to this book. But whatever they attempt is
likely to boomerang and explode right under their plot.
In a letter from R. N. Newcomb to LIFE magazine (Aug. 1949)
the question was asked: "Did it ever occur to you that if the real answer
to polio is established it means the end for a racket that has annually, for
many years, reaped tens of millions of dollars from the public by means of sob
propaganda. It also would, in large degree, dry up the yearly freshet of
hundreds of millions paid in medical and associated fees by the families of
those afflicted. If you beieve that the real answer to polio is honestly
being sought and would be available to the world when found, then you would
also believe that General Motors would back research to make the use of
Since 1938 the MARCH OF DIMES has reaped over $300,000,000. What have they
done with it? Polio has not been checked; it has increased. Polio " patients in
the hospitals, supposedly using some of the March of dimes money have died in
larger numbers than those who stay home and have no special care. Those who
recover in the hospital are in about the same proportion as those who do not go
to the hospitals. Who gets this public donation? The April 1952 issue of EXPOSE
gives us a hint in this statement:
"The public will never know what proportion of their dollars went for fund
raising and administration. Unlike all other leading non-profit organizations,
the Foundation for Infantile Paralysis has refused to make these facts available
to the public.
"It is estimated that $15,000,000 a year (a very conservative estimate) are
poured down the drain called General Administration Expenses.
"If you contributed your dimes and dollars, a large part of your contribution
went to pay somebody who sits behind a desk and gets a large salary to figure
out new ways to get more contributions from you the next time.
"Every man, woman and child in the United States is marked for a specific per
capita contribution. This is wrung from you with gimmicks ranging from March of
Dimes cards to Iron Lung collectors, metal lapel tabs, house to house, office to
office, school and motion picture collections.
"There are special tear jerking posters available to all magazines and
newspapers. Also movie shorts with a popular star making a pitiful plea for
hand-outs. Radio and TV shows are punctuated with money grabbing skits and
"Philanthropy has now become one of the 10 big industries in the U.S.
"In 1918 the National Information Bureau was established to
provide information and advice on philanthropic groups. This Bureau is a
non-profit organization. It has investigated more than 4,000 national
organizations during the past 33 years. The bureau has standards against which
all charities are measured. All reports are confidential.
"Most collection groups meet all the standards of the Bureau.
"The National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis, Inc., does not . . . It
does not issue a complete audit of income, expenditures and assets.
"In recent years, an attempt has been made to establish a system by which
funds necessary to support health services could be secured in a single joint
campaign. It would save millions of dollars that now go into the pockets of
professional fund-raisers and never get near the purpose they are contributed
for. Every other major group in the United States has expressed a willingness to
join such a federated drivewith the single exception of the March of Dimes."
It seems some branches of the government were getting suspicious of the
pretended search for a cure for polio carried on at such expense by the
National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis, so it was suggested that the
government conduct some research in this direction.
On this phase of the subject, EXPOSE reports:
"In 1948 the Foundation for Infantile Paralysis told a Congressional
Committee that there is no need for the government to conduct research at
this time in polio.
"When asked to explain this strange attitude, Foundation officials stated
frankly: "When the Government takes over an activity . . . contributions fall
off ..We do not wish to take that gamble!"
The Science News Letter tells us that "some 200 scientists are
researching upon phases of polio and 510 projects in 91 institutions have been
under way in the 16 years of this great polio campaign."
Over $300,000,000 have been spent already and $50,000,000 per year more are
being collected and spent with not one dime being used for research on fasting
and proper nutrition and the only other things that can prevent and cure polio.
After the announcement from Philadelphia (1934) that Dr. John A.
Kolmer had discovered a "protective (?) vaccine" against infantile
paralysis, Dr. W. Lloyd Aycock, director of the Harvard
Infantile Paralysis Commission and called "one of the most distinguished experts
in this disease", gave a statement to the press that "Nature does a
better job of immunizing against infantile paralysis than the artificial
methods" which he branded as "Hazardous."
If we remove the obstructions and supply the body with the necessary
building material, nature will heal practically any disease so long as too much
of the vital organs or glands have not already been destroyed by disease or
What are the obstructions to be removed in the healing process?
Obviously, drastic poisons such as vaccine serums, drugs, tobacco, alcohol,
coffee, tea, cola drinks, etc. poison the system immediately and set up disease
states. But other blockages form slowly in the tissues as a result of
incompatible foods, wrong food combinations, and over eating. These substances
as well as the drugs, interfere with normal digestion and assimilation. The
by-products of perverted metabolism undergo a chemical change and are lodged in
the tissues in solid form. Some are in the form of sharp needle-like crystals
that cause pain in arthritis; others accumulate into hardened masses which are
called gallstones. A gluey material coats the blood vessels and slows down
circulation. "Some of these blockade materials are cholesterol (from
fat), uric acid formed from excess protein (any more than two ounces per
day is excess protein), carbonic acid from sugar and starch, chlorine
(from table salt), and calcium carbonate (from milk, calcium tablets
and other calcium containing substances that failed to assimilate because of
some type of interference or glandular mal-functioning." Dr. M. O. Garten.
Most people are over loaded with these infusions of blockade materials
that cannot be utilized by the body. When some extra strain is put upon the
vital forces such as sudden change in the weather, fatigue, fear, worry, wrong
food etc., the body is unable to hold back the "bursting tide of accumulated
waste" any longer and lets goforces it out in a cleansing program, that usually
lasts from 5 days to two weeks. Colds, eruptions, fevers, diarrhea and even
paralysis are symptoms of this cleansing effort to rid the body of waste that
has not been eliminated through the usual channels. People do not catch
diseases from others who have it. All those who are ill built their own
causes and the same stresses triggered off the "cleansing act" in all
who had reached the saturation point of poisons.
When poisons flow in a free state in the body as is the case with vaccines,
the internal defense mechanism is forced to rob the tissues of calcium and other
alkalizing elements to neutralize these poisons. If the person is on the
borderline of calcium deficiency then there can be no neutralizing and collapse
or paralysis is the result.
R. B. Pearson made an exhaustive study of the data and
experiments that have been made with polio vaccines and summed up his finding as
follows: "Hence, I believe there was no virus in the vaccine used. It was just a
solution of the toxins and acid end-products of the decomposed proteins
used that caused all the paralysis. The acids generated by cooked meat in Dr.
Pottengers cats (experiment that caused polio in the cats) affected the nerves
first, and the acids formed in the decomposed proteins used in the vaccines
affected the nerves first. It is the same thing and, no so-called virus is
connected with it." (From Infantile Paralysis, by Pearson.)
Many methods have been tried by drugless doctors in an attempt to rid the
body of the blockage materials that stood in the way of recovery. The right kind
of an elimination diet has been very beneficial, proper breathing and exercises
have helped, mental and spiritual treatments have been useful to a few but the
method that has brought the best and surest removal of poisons and recovery from
disease is FASTING. Those who are experienced in fasting therapy
claim that fasting is 20 times more efficient as a healing measure than anything
On a fast, no food of any kind is eaten and no juices taken. Water is
permitted and thats all. Fasting is not starving. Starving does not begin until
after 8 or 10 weeks of fasting. The fast should be broken before that time. A
long fast should be supervised by someone who is experienced in conducting
fasts. Some of the best authorities on this most valuable of healing aids, are
listed in a another chapter. A good book on fasting should be studied before
undertaking a fast at home. Short fasts of two or three days may quite safely be
taken at home. (Some of the best fasting books are sold by HEALTH RESEARCH,
Mokelumne Hill, Calif.) The experts in the field tell us that the fast should be
followed by fresh fruits and juices or fresh (not canned) vegetable juices at a
separate meal. Several days of simple meals of fruits and vegetables should be
the rule before any starch or protein is eaten. Needless to say, the old habits
of wrong eating should not be continued. A good guide to follow after the fast
is Dr. Sheltons little book, "FOOD COMBINING MADE EASY."
Hot baths have been beneficial in many cases of polio. The late
Bernarr MacFadden said, "A warm bath 98 to 99 degrees for an hour or
more, two or three times daily, with drinking of nothing but water, if adopted
immediately after the onset of polioshould cleanse the system and divert the
attack." (No soap or anything else should be used in the water)
A friend of mine who was paralyzed after his shots at camp during the First
World War said he lay helpless in the Army hospital for weeks then one night
when the nurses went to a dance in the recreation hall downstairs he dragged
himself out of bed and pulled himself across the floor by his elbows until he
reached the bathroom. Then he filled the tub full of hot water and managed to
get in and stayed there quite a while. When he got out he could walk so he
dressed and went downstairs and stood in the doorway and his nurse almost
fainted when she saw him. He was sent overseas after that. When he came back he
had a condition of forgetfulness which they called "shell shock" but it was more
than likely the after effects of the vaccine poisoning.
Some doctors, in trying to build up the calcium deficiency in polio and other
poisoned patients, give them calcium tablets, bone meal, lime and other such
concentrates. Some report good results while others are harmed by it. Calcium
cannot be assimilated without the proper balance of phosphorus, iron, sodium,
vitamin B, C, and D. Most of the vitamin pills on the market are synthetic coal
tar products or fish liver oil and act as irritants instead of foods. These are
not recommended NQ chemist or doctor knows the exact proportion in which these
elements should be combined, therefore it is better to get them as they grow in
nature where they are combined in perfect balance.
Some of the richest sources of calcium are: Turnip greens, mustard greens,
watercress, powdered whey, celery, turnips, spinach, cauliflower, dandelion
greens, dried figs, hazelnuts, molasses, lentils, endive, chard, escarole, milk,
cheese, parsley, alfalfa tea, and others. These, of course, must be free from
TO REMOVE POISON SPRAY FROM FRUITS AND VEGETABLES
Much of the spray can be removed by a 1 % solution of Hydrochloric acid.
A simple way is to pour ½ cup of the acid into a large enamel pan or crock
(not metal such as tin or aluminum). Add two gallons of water and let the fruits
and vegetables remain in the solution for 3 minutes. Then drain and rinse in
clear water. The solution may be saved and used for several days. In the
meantime make demands of our public officials that poisons on foods be
Healthy soil, free from chemical fertilizers and sprays will produce foods
that are free from disease and pests. This has been tested and proved by the so
called "organic-farming" methods with their balanced compost and powdered
granite and other soil builders.
If we are to eliminate polio epidemics and free our country from all
disease we must attack the problem at its source. The foundation is in the
healthy soil, then the healthy food can be raised. With the improved
food and correct health education and banishment of commercialized
foodless-foods, drugs, narcotics and other products that menace the race we
can raise our low standard of health (with 90% of our people below par) up to
the level where it should be. Only then can we expect to have unlimited health,
happiness and progress.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
“A sacred cow will not protect the herd.”
-- Sandy Gottstein
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"