Should decision on vaccination be best for you or us?
xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml"
xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
Should decision on vaccination be best for you or us?
Should decision on vaccination be best for
you or us?
EDITORAlthough
I agree with Majeed that Dr Peter Mansfield's referral to the General Medical
Council seems inappropriate,this may prompt more debate around the
important issue of whetherit is reasonable to legislate for the
rights of the communityover the rights of the individual as regards
vaccination for measles,mumps, and rubella.1
The argument seems to be that we know that combined measles, mumps, and
rubella vaccine is safe and effective (anyone whotakes the time to
assess the extensive literature should be ableto persuade
themselves of this fact) and that single vaccinesmay reduce
adherence to the full course and show no advantage.The community
therefore loses out as a result of an individual'sdecision, by a
reduction in herd immunity and an increased chanceof an epidemic.
The Department of Health therefore thinks thatsingle vaccines
should not be offered on the NHS, and there isnow a question as to
whether this is defensible medicalpractice.
Other individual choices (such as aspirin or warfarin in stroke prevention)
are allowed as these are not seen to affect thecommunity directly,
although they might result in a notable burdenfor those caring for
the increased numbers of people with strokesthat this wouldcreate.
The Department of Health banks on the fact that more people would take up
the option of receiving single vaccines if theywere available than
would refuse all vaccinations if the formerwere not available.
Although this may seem sensible from a publichealth and community
perspective, it is sometimes difficult tocommunicate the lack of
individual choice in this matter in theconsulting room. Shouldn't
we, in this age of "patient centred"medicine, trust
patients to make decisions for their own children?This would mean
the cost of a potential epidemic with each mediascare, but give
parents the freedom, responsibility, and ownershipof such adecision.
Alex Manning, general practitioner.
Burwell Surgery, Burwell, Cambridgeshire CB5 0AE alex.sam@virgin.net
1.
Majeed A. Referral of Dr Peter Mansfield to the GMC. BMJ
2001; 323: 356[Full
Text]. (18 August.)
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"