Patriotism has become the refuge of corporate scoundrels.
by Jamie Court - Executive Director - FTCR
Patriotism has become the refuge of corporate
scoundrels.
This week Eli Lilly and other large American corporations hijacked the
"Homeland Security" legislation to win the right to be free from legal
accountability for their dangerous drugs, products and technologies.
Corporate "Homeland Security" contractors also won the right to maintain off
shore tax havens.
In the guise of providing cheaper terrorism insurance, Congress sent
President Bush a bill throwing out state regulation of insurance premium
increases for policies that provide terrorism coverage.
President Bush's energy bill, which professes to reduce dependence on
foreign energy sources, will surreptitiously repeal a 65 year-old federal
law, the Public Utilities Holding Company Act, that protects ratepayers from
subsidizing corporate expansion, monopolistic abuses and shoddy accounting
practices.
While individuals are losing liberties, such as protection from search and
seizure under secret spy court rulings, corporations are exploiting the
national crisis to gain new freedoms from accountability to government and
the courts.
The corporate pork is the result of both the growing political power of
corporations and the lack of public knowledge about their power plays. That
corporations can manipulate markets was clear from documents released last
week by federal regulators showing officials at two energy companies
colluded to keep electric power off line in order to drive up prices.
Discussing how corporations manipulate society, however, is far more taboo
in a political process that corporations have come to capture.
The new corporate freedoms are, in fact, the spoils of a 2002 election in
which, according to an analysis by one of America's largest corporate law
firms, "business fully engaged in pivotal races" and corporate spending was
"pivotal in close Republican victories." The November 6th analysis by Piper
Rudnick, the world's 34th largest law firm, details how the GOP victories
stemmed from corporations turning out their employees to vote by stuffing
employee paychecks with voting materials, and from corporate funding for
eleventh hour television advertising in key races.
Both sides of the aisle in this week's lame duck U.S. Senate, which voted 90
to 9 for the "Homeland Security" bill, obviously took notice of the real
2002 electoral victors: Corporate America.
Among Piper Rudnick's celebrated corporate efforts were the Business and
Industry Political Action Committee (BIPAC) developing a "voter guide for
5,000 companies/20 million employees"; the U.S. Chamber of Commerce printing
"tens of thousands of 'Vote! It's Your Business' inserts for employees'
paycheck envelopes in states with key Senate and House races"; and the
National Beer Wholesalers Association (NBWA) inserting "voting information
fliers into employees' paycheck envelopes."
In addition to citing how corporations spent $1.562 million in Colorado and
$1 million in New Hampshire on last minute advertising to change control of
the U.S. Senate, the law firm reported "Business groups [are] estimated to
outspend traditional Democratic groups nearly 3 to 1 in 2002 House races."
The analysis also shows that recently enacted campaign finance reform laws
will actually increase the political power of corporations. Discussing "new
efforts to rechannel soft money outlets," Piper Rudnick states that spending
on uncapped issue-related committees that talk about candidates' positions
"give business control over soft money spending," and "business
contributions through such organizations has been pivotal in key races. Soft
money spending is likely to continue to increase."
For example, the GOP Senate victory in Colorado was attributed to television
issue advertising paid for by "United Seniors Association/Pfizer" that
showcased the Republican candidate Wayne Allard's support for helping
seniors get a Medicare prescription drug coverage. In fact, the Democratic
Senate passed a mandatory prescription benefit in 2001 and 2002 opposed by
Allard and Pfizer, who favor a voluntary benefit to be provided by insurers
that can charge as much as they like.
Corporations' real power today is that their virtually unlimited resources
allow them to be invisible while framing political and cultural issues
strategically, because there is no limit or accountability for what they say
and do.
Such corporate power requires the public to question everything they hear
and from whom it comes. The populists left in government must also recognize
the magnitude of corporate power's threat to democracy. They must push to
limit and to make transparent the way corporations manipulate not merely
markets, but society.
Corporations should not be allowed to turn workplaces into voting booths.
The names of corporations that fund political issue advertising should have
to be disclosed on every advertisement they fund, not simply phony committee
names. A Corporate Impact Analysis, another CIA, should be published by
corporations and sent to every investor enumerating the
company's political activities. This agenda is the only refuge for true
patriots.
----------
Jamie Court is executive director of the Santa Monica-based Foundation for
Taxpayer and Consumer Rights (FTCR).
jamie@consumerwatchdog.org
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"